User talk:Aparna rajesh

Image copyright problem with Image:Friendshipthai.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Friendshipthai.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jung da bin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jung da bin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem with Forbidden Floor[edit]

I deleted some text here which was pretty much an exact copy of text from a website. We don't accept text copied from websites on Wikipedia, unless we have documentation, following certain procedures, showing that there is copyright permission. (See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) Please don't delete the CorenSearchBot tag as you did here when the copyrighted text is still on the page. Making small changes is not good enough; it would have to be completely rewritten. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 02:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:D-Day poster.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:D-Day poster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 05:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Janghwa Hongreyon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Janghwa Hongreyon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation advice[edit]

Hi, when you create a new article, you should try to explain the significance of the subject, and provide some reference to show what your source is. (The requirement of adding sources is especially critical when the subject is a living person.) An article which just states that the subject is an actor or actress will largely run afoul of a speedy deletion criterion regarding biographies which have no assertion of significance. Yours, Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Coffin (Thai film)[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Coffin (Thai film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kirachinmoku (talk) 12:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Coming Soon (2008 film)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Coming Soon (2008 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Josh Parris 11:57, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:303fearfaithposter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:303fearfaithposter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?[edit]

Can you please stop making edits like this? They make no sense whatsoever. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 06:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries[edit]

Can you also stop copying film plot summaries from other websites (such as IMDb). This is not allowed on Wikipedia, and you've been told about it before. PC78 (talk) 09:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Cyborgsheposter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cyborgsheposter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Maligno (1977 film)[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Maligno (1977 film), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Maligno (1977 film) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Maligno (1977 film), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

T.Krishna[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of T.Krishna, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: T. Krishna. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop doing this![edit]

I've asked you before, and now I'm asking you again: can you stop making edits like this? Linking to random films in the plot summaries of other unrelated film articles makes no sense at all, and I don't know why you're doing it, especially when you seem to revert yourself half of the time. PC78 (talk) 10:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And stop copying plot summaries from IMDb – this is a violation of copyright and it is simply not allowed. PC78 (talk) 12:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Remodelledbeauty.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Remodelledbeauty.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 12:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thecoffinposter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thecoffinposter.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Cut (2007 film)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Cut (2007 film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://chinkymovies.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/7888517782883060731. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Takipsilim[edit]

A tag has been placed on Takipsilim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 11:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your final warning about copyright violations. The next time you copy and paste information from other websites to create articles on Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. You may use other sites as references, but you may not simply copy everything off of that website. Please ask if you have any questions about this, either way (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This really is your last warning. You promised to stop doing this, and yet you've just copied the plot summary for Naanayam from this website. Please stop, because you will be blocked from editing. PC78 (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry...[edit]

...but I can't help you with every article you create - it's up to you to make a greater effort. I don't want to see you get banned because I know your intentions are good, but you need to start reading these messages on your talk page and understand what they say. PC78 (talk) 12:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Remodelledbeauty.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Remodelledbeauty.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thalaivaasal Vijay[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thalaivaasal Vijay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of passing Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Entertainers

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 04:20, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted some of your edits[edit]

Hi, Aparna rajesh. I'm not sure what you meant by edits like this one. Perhaps it is meant as a "See also?" If that is the case, we don't do this to link to similar films, just to similar topics. Also, the links you were putting in appeared to just be random, since I could make no sense out of them. Anyway, I have reverted the ones I came across. I see that you have been warned about this kind of editing before. All I can do is repeat-- please do not do this-- and hope you will heed my advice and make more constructive edits. Dekkappai (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're still doing it [1] - what do you mean by these edits? They aren't making sense to anyone else, and you've been asked several times now to stop doing it. If it continues I will have to report it. PC78 (talk) 12:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fu'ad Ait Aattou[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fu'ad Ait Aattou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. UKWikiGuy (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of A Bloody Aria[edit]

I have nominated A Bloody Aria, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Bloody Aria. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 07:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Devil and the Beauty[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Devil and the Beauty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for See WP:ANI#User:Aparna rajesh (again).. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sandstein 18:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aparna rajesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I Never Write Copyright

No reason for unblocking given; it appears that you have been blocked for copyright violations and disruption. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Resentful Woman[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Resentful Woman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of notability in article. Neither KMDB nor IMDB indicate any awards or reviews, nor awards for the director or writer.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongo matic 17:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Aparna rajesh. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 11:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bhargavi (actress)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Bhargavi (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 01:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sameera Banerjee[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sameera Banerjee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article is about a living person. The article is a stub, is poorly sourced and does not make the notability of the person clear. It has been tagged as unsourced since November 2008 & tagged for notability since December 2008. Nothing new has been added, no sources have been added and no notability details have been included.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lukeyboyuk (talk) 20:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Stop Violence[edit]

I have nominated Stop Violence, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Violence. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 19:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss India South[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miss India South, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stray Dogs (1983 film)[edit]

The article Stray Dogs (1983 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM, only sources given are from IMDb and a rotten link. Tried and failed to find additional sources for the movie.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Chevvin 15:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]