Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Bloody Aria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nom.

A Bloody Aria[edit]

Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 07:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How do you figure that? Did you check any Korean sources for verifiability? Did you look for reviews, awards notable participation? - Mgm|^(talk) 12:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article leaves much to be desired, but the film is plenty notable enough. Reviews in The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Empire, The Guardian and plenty more. I'll have a crack at cleaning up the article later. Nominator should know better and do a little research before bringing articles here. PC78 (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't know what to do here-- the film is obviously notable, but the editor who started it seems to be throwing out completely unsourced stubs on these things. Do we sit back and let articles on notable subjects get deleted, or do this editor's work for him? PC78 is absolutely right-- a clearly notable film from a slightly-out-of-mainstream film industry should not be brought to AfD. It should be improved either by the creating editor, or those concerned about its notability should request help from editors with experience in the subject area. I'd jump in and do the work, but, because of just this sort of reckless Deletionism, my enthusiasm for this kind of thing ran out long ago. Those who care about it-- the editor who started this page, or those who are requesting its deletion-- should make the effort to improve it or put tags on it to request improvement... PC78 is a good editor in this area, and I trust him to do the work. So, in the original Wiki-spirit of improving rather than throwing out, I say Keep. Dekkappai (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. It looks like the problem of this editor creating unsourced stubbery on notable Korean films has been solved with a sledge hammer... Although couple warning blocks may have been in order first? Dekkappai (talk) 18:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Notable film reviewed by reliable sources, meets Wikipedia:NOTFILM. --Jmundo (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NF and much sympathy for the slew of stubs. There is no deadline ro get them improved... but maybe the author can be adopted or schooled? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just read of the author being indef blocked. Ouch. No warning blocks? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.