User talk:Anonymouswrecker

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymouswrecker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did not mean to violate my editing priveleges. It wil not happen again

Decline reason:

Please describe what it is that you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and what constructive contributions you want to make if unblocked. I am declining your request at this time. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=I edited minor mistakes in some documents but apparently i did too much too soon. I would not edit so much articles at ones again if i am unblocked. I will offer constructive edits to articles which NEED my edits. I have learned my lesson.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymouswrecker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited minor mistakes in some documents but apparently i did too much too soon. I would not edit so much articles at ones again if i am unblocked. I will offer constructive edits to articles which NEED my edits. I have learned my lesson. I am really sorry , i apologize for my behaviour

Decline reason:

We don't need help from people who make edits like this one. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Jasmine "Jem" Miller (singer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasmine "Jem" Miller (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine "Jem" Miller (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 18:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]