User talk:Amitchell125/Archive 7
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archives 2010–2022: | |
|
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014–2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
|
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Obadiah Short, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castle Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian of Norwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Hodgson (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Vincent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| Thanks for your work on Julian of Norwich. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yang Yongxin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ECT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:East Anglian kings chart.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Now redundant to File:East Anglian kings chart gray.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Lound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Dixon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of James Sillett
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James Sillett you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johnbod -- Johnbod (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm slow
Hi Amitchell125. Just a quick note to say I'm going to do my best to get through the Mabel Russell GA, and I really appreciate the work you've put into it. Unfortunately, it's come at little bit of a bad time, as things are a little hectic over at Arbcom, so might not meet the 7 day target. Hopefully you won't mind giving me a little leeway? WormTT(talk) 08:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. I'm helpful, so let's say a fortnight (7 Sept) instead of a week. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 12:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of James Sillett
The article James Sillett you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:James Sillett for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johnbod -- Johnbod (talk) 03:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Julian of Norwich
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Julian of Norwich you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Julian of Norwich
The article Julian of Norwich you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Julian of Norwich for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Coronation review
Hello once more and thanks for all your help with the article. Sorry you have had to put up with such problems which should never have arisen because the copyright notice you found is crystal clear and it is absolutely applicable in Great Britain, if not in other countries. To be fair, it should have occurred to me that there might be a constraint but, well, can't think of everything. I don't know if you feel inclined to continue with the review and I fully understand if you would prefer to close it. If you do withdraw, please fail the review on the grounds that the copyright was violated. I won't mind because I didn't introduce the section. I may look at the article again in future and see what I can do to revive Victoria's account in a narrative form, perhaps by using other sources like Lucy Worsley, etc. rather than the journal.
I'm removing the copyvio section again and will leave the article alone after that. I'll hopefully be able look in sometime tomorrow or Tuesday. All the best for now. No Great Shaker (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
GAN woman’s suffrage parade
Yes, I would appreciate your review. I have not been active lately, but am willing to work on this. I am on vacation, but will be home in a week. Thanks so much. ~~biotech46 Biotech46 (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your thorough review and recommendation to move/rename the article. I will begin working on the edits today.--Biotech46 (talk) 15:03, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
In appreciation of high quality map work
|
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
| By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your producing a superb map for Battle of Cape Ecnomus. It is much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC) |
Herbert Vivian
Hi. I know we still have a fair stretch to go with the Herbert Vivian GA review. But I'd really like to appreciate the excellent work you've done here. Even if the article doesn't get to GA status, it will have been improved beyond measure by your excellent suggestions. Thank you. I am really enjoying the work. Best, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @The Mirror Cracked: Happy to continue with Herbert Vivian, but I am soon to hit the newspaper citations, which involves getting to a library, so I may be slowed down a bit by that. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
Ami. Thank you for the work on Herbert Vivian! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
|
The Good Article Barnstar | |
| For your diligence, thoughtfulness and wonderful collaboration, getting Herbert Vivian to Good Article status. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC) |
Good Article Backlog Drive Barnstar
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
|
Thanks for your participation in the September 2019 GA Backlog drive. Your 11 reviews made a difference, as did your willingness to review particularly old nominations. The work of editors like you helped bring down the unreviewed backlog by over 35%. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC) |
Suggestions
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Herbert Vivian potential featured article candidate
Hi Ami, now that some time has passed since your GA review of Herbert Vivian, I'd like to ask your opinion of submitting it for Featured Article status. Do you think that's realistic? Your very thorough GA review helped improve the article immeasurably, and reading the FA criteria it feels possible to get there, but I'd love your honest opinion. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hauran base map source
Hi Amitchell. Could you add the source link for the base map of File:Map of the Hauran (satellite version).svg? In case I nominate the Hauran article for FAC the lack of such a source might come up as an issue during the image review. Also, I'd like the source for my own purposes, as I'm starting on an article on a different geographic area of Syria (the Matkh depression near Aleppo) and would like to use the map as an illustration. Regards, --Al Ameer (talk) 16:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Your GA nomination of Edward Thomas Daniell
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edward Thomas Daniell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 14:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edward Thomas Daniell
The article Edward Thomas Daniell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edward Thomas Daniell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Flanders 1382.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Pulsar planets
The distinction between what makes a "pulsar planet" and what makes a companion to a pulsar a "brown dwarf" or "degenerate core" etc. is somewhat arbitrary, but our article on pulsar planet has a pretty good list of the objects which astronomers agree are really *planets*. You'll notice, for example, that the Black Widow Pulsar companion does not appear. Somewhat arbitrarily, the limit is about 10 Jupiter masses or so. jps (talk) 14:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
|
Merry Christmas Amitchell125 |
|
Hi Amitchell125, wishing you and your family a very Merry Christmas |