User talk:Alenglin

This is Alenglin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Fitzalan, 10th Baron Arundel (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:INLINECITE and cite your sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Fitzalan, 10th Baron Arundel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alenglin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Fitzalan, 10th Baron Arundel (April 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Body text must be more encyclopedic in note and contain things like dates of birth and death.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Fitzalan, 10th Baron Arundel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi Alenglin. Thank you for your work on Mill of the tomb. Another editor, Boleyn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add blue-linked categories.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Fram (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Chandamour[edit]

Hello Alenglin, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Chandamour, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandamour.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jonathan Deamer}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts[edit]

Does Afx44230 belong to you? What other accounts are you using?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you declared your other account. That's a start, but you haven't answered my question. Also, why do you need a second account?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not other accounts. Alenglin (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have only Afx44230 and Alenglin. One account is for History, the other account is for other articles or item. I admit that sometimes I get the count wrong. I will be very careful from now. Alenglin (talk) 06:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is not very good, so I'm having trouble following your explanation of why you need two accounts. Afx44230 has made only 14 edits, and all of them have been to three pages that Alenglin has edited, two of which were created by Alenglin. I don't see how that matches your explanation. Also, although you have declared Afx on Alenglin's user page, you have not declared Alenglin on Afx's userpage. Both are required. That said, I'm leaning toward blocking Afx unless you can provide a more reasonable justification for having two accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]