User talk:68.39.174.238/Account debate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The below text is transcluded from a sub page because people kept complaining that my page was too long D:... (Thanx to User:BD for the move). Note that this (The page and then lists) were suggested by others, IE. I'm not maintaining these for self-aggrandizement, nor do I solicit people's entires here. 68.39.174.238 11:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of users who want you to make an account[edit]

"Don't fly with the finches when you can soar with the eagles."

If you urge 68.39.174.238 to get an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylu (talk • contribs) {{User talk:68.39.174.238/accountbeggars}}

This user has urged 68.39.174.238 76.117.247.55 to get an account.
Note that User:Nathanrdotcom has created a page for culinary (And possibly other) inducements, which was formerly located on my main user page. Thanx N.R.!
  • You're welcome! — nathanrdotcom (T • C • W) 05:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • added a bugatti to inducements but not my name to the +44's - Titoxd stops the numbering. Metarhyme 03:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
136 Wikipedians want 68.39.174.238 to get an account.
Feel free to add to this list
  1. Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 02:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. HappyCamper 02:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I've read this page, and yes, you should make one. NSLE (T+C+CVU) 02:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Shanel 02:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC) Do it, doooo ittt......[reply]
    I hate you, you keep beating me to reverting :P--Shanel 02:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Francs2000 02:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oran e (t) (c) (e-mail) 03:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holy bejeesus, yes. CHAIRBOY (☎) 03:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Robert 04:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support I thought he already was one. 04:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC) CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    REAL smooth. I'm blaming whoever said that somewhere around here D:... 68.39.174.238 04:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry but votes and comments from editors without accounts dont count. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:09, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    This vote has no effect and so votes and editors with accounts don`t count. 68.39.174.238 04:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Speedy Support You MUST create a account, excellent vandal fighter, hell I could even nominate you for adminship quickly if you do :D --Aranda 56 04:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support as long as I don't have to. — 12.201.72.68 04:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support. --Ixfd64 05:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support or assimilatemerge to Borg. --Nlu (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Get an account, if for no other reason than to be recognized as a non-vandal. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 06:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    GEH! I STRONGLY protest the assertation that IPs are vandals, or the assumption of that. I *WILL NOT* get an account solely to satisfy such people. 68.39.174.238 06:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    When I say "recognized", I allude to the fact that a username entry would be easier for a human patroller to recognize as a contribution from a trustworthy editor, rather than incurring simultaneous scrutiny by six or seven patrollers. Also, while it would be debatable to say "most IP users are vandals" (because I suspect a large portion of the IP-user vandalism is caused by relatively few actual people), it not debatable to say "most vandalism does come from IP users." Thus, you should, really, take no offense to this. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 07:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    If it wasn't for the fact that other pplseem to think so I likely whouldn't take that that way... 68.39.174.238 07:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. user:JiFish - You are a good user. You should get an account. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 14:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Izehar (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support --tyomitch 14:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Excellent vandal fighter --Prodego talk 17:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support. You should create an account and then immediately nominate yourself for adminship. You would be helping the RC patrol by creating an account with an easily recognizable user name. --TantalumTelluride 19:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    I propose the name Sixty-eight on Wheels!. --Nlu (talk) 20:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support good editor who needs an account!--Alhutch 21:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support What they said –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 23:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support. Would make a great user! ;] --негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 00:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support—do it, do it now! =) Bmdavll talk 22:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support - so we can admin you three minutes later. JFW | T@lk 11:44, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Yes unless you already are one. Keep removing vandalism and good work. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 16:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Strong support. the wub "?!" 17:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support, so we can admin you. --Wikiacc (talk) 21:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. That and sysop-ship after two months of using that account. IPs don't last forever, you know. Me and him are really fighting that Communism dude, anyway. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 05:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support - has an anon ever been granted adminship before? --Celestianpower háblame 14:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Jwissick(t)(c) 07:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support, and happy new year. :D —Locke Cole • t • c 08:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --F. Cosoleto 01:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support. Get an account already! It's not that hard to log in every time. — Alex 07:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Strongly Support You are a great editor and have done a great job fighting vandalism. You should be an admin, as a matter of fact. Mrbelvedereposter28 23:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. support: Heh. Ombudsman 06:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support: I swear I had a vote here before... WikiFanatic 22:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Come on! You are so great! You would be adminned so fast! Viva La Vie Boheme
  38. get an account already! You would be a very good wikipedian! ID'd award you a barnstar but I really can't atm for 2 reasons: lost my accounts pass and I cant award a barnstar to a masked avenger :D keep up the good work, with an account or not! :D --217.129.205.214 23:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC) (AKA Chaos Reaver[reply]
  39. Support -- Tvaughn05e (Talk)(Contribs) 15:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. SUPPORT!!!! (whoops, have I already voted before? I wear my userbox with pride... GET AN ACCOUNT!)Nippoo 12:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support. Every damn time you beat me to a revert I have to check the diffs to make sure it's legit. Really annoying :( --Rory096 08:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Computerjoe's talk 17:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Strong Support: This user could probably get admin in a week if he joined. M o P 18:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support-I stumbeled here by accident, had no idea what I was stumbling into, but I have the feeling I've stumbeled on to something pretty large. Yeah, I would say get an account. I really do like and deeply respect how you're trying to make a good name for IP's but If anything it would just be much easier to remember. 68.39.174.238 just isn't that catchy. ;-) --Sgore 03:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. What, you're not already an admin?!-Support And for the hell of it, have another barnstar. Also, I'm going to create you a user page with all your barnstars on it. (Just don't revert me, lol) --ZsinjTalk 03:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Just a thought: perhaps we should create a userbox saying "I am one of those who urged 68.39.174.238 to create an account", then all those above can proudly display it on their user pages! Ekjon Lok 02:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hehehe...{{User 68.39.174.238}} Titoxd(?!? - help us) 02:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Templatized by —Locke Cole • t • c 06:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. +44 Support - pretty please. We can really use an admin with your level of quality contributions and dedication to The Project. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 06:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. +44 Support - I've done it at some point. And you could be admin! -- Jjjsixsix (t)/(c) @ 06:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support; you are a true member of Wikipedia, regardless of whether or not you have an official membership; however, to be an admin - a position which you deserve - you must be a regesterd member. PS: Don't format your hard drive and reinstall your Operating System - you don't want to lose your IP! David P. A. Hunter 11:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC) PS: The template above can now be seen at User:hunterd/68.39.174.238, making it a true template; I will keep it here until you get an account - at which point I'll move it into your user page. It can be used by typing: {${User:Hunterd/68.39.174.238}$} without the dollar signs($).[reply]
  49. --Randy Johnston 00:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Get an account.--GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 05:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support you can be a even better contributor if you make an account! The Gerg 16:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support I really hate the fact that you always beat me to reverting, and then I have to check that you're not a vandal, although you're an anon user! Very annoying! >.< --Emc² (CONTACT ME) 22:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support You really should join!
  54. Do it c'mon, all the kids at school are doing it! Just one user account, it won't kill you. Just click the sign up link and inhale deep. Hold it in - don't sign out. Oh wait, we're talking about user accounts? --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Please. --Zoz (t) 18:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Very, Very, Very, Strong Support. Oh, come on. You really do help us out a lot. ―Linux|erist 11:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Cleared for signing up to get an account Then, you'll be able to assist me in my admin work :D --Pilot|guy 13:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Give it up sign up, it is so much easier with an account. I edited on and off for about six months and it is much better.
  59. --John Lake 03:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support--KojiDude (talk) 05:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Ater thinking about it for a while, I changed my vote to Oppose. You have the freedom to do whatever you want, and if you don't want to get an account, more power too ya!--KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 01:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Die die must join. I support you!--Tdxiang 07:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. I was just passing by, when I noticed what an excellent editor this IP is. You shouls seriously get an account, what happens when you change ISP? Your current IP and identity will be lost forever! How do you prove you were connected to this IP back then? +Hexagon1 (t) 03:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support, good IP vandal fighter around, get an account please. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 09:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Of course, why not get one? You're obviously a very good vandal fighter. - Bootstoots 16:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Strong support Give in to your anger! Bakanov 17:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support, so you might someday become an admin. --StuffOfInterest 12:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. SUPPORT!, We need you!! Mrstupid 20:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support automatic admin, or maybe in fact I will, nominate you for adminship anyway. Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 16:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support If anything, getting an account will make removing vandalism more efficient. I too used to edit anonymously for some time, until I plucked up my courage and declared myself openly.--Planetary 03:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Should get an account in the most brief delays.
  70. Support u mostlikly find this fun so just get oneTrackMonkey 03:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support. How scary is a vandal fighter called "68"? Get a really intimidating username. Reaaaalllyy intimidating. Kribbeh 16:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support. Join us!! --Dylan Lake 23:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC) changed to Indifferent Dylan Lake 04:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support - Join us!!!, we'd like you here!!! --AAA! 03:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support I found this page after catching a very well-written paragraph by this IP. I was surprised, and strongly encourage this user to get an account!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 00:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support It's better been a registered user. --JForget 02:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Registration is better than Generalization. --Omega Archdoom05:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support. When pgkbot says "Whitelist User:68.39.174.238" it just looks wrong to me. ;) --SonicChao talk 21:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Yes please. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support, any anon user who helps fight vandalism so well should get an account. This way we can put a name ot the greatness.--Wizardman 03:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Yes -- but stay out of the kitchen ... and for Pete's sake, don't touch those pies! --A. B. (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support. What happens if your ISP blocks you? I'm frightened for you, frankly. You should be an admin, not an anon at the whim of his service provider. I've also offered an inducement, which I will seriously, really, truly send you if you get an account. --N Shar 02:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  81. You really should register for an account, bro. You're setting yourself up as a target for discrimination. As you definitely know by now, many people run on the assumption that anonymous accounts are newbies or vandals, and scrutinize the edits of such accounts very heavily. You almost seem to encourage this, by keeping your userpage redlinked and by refusing to register, but I'd still like to suggest that you do so. The couple of minutes it takes to set up an account would save you a lot of hassle in the long run. Just my two cents though, and I'm sure you have your reasons for not doing so. Either way, best of luck to you and thanks for your contributions. =) – Lantoka (talk) 21:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Strong support. Please create an account to continue. — Meteoroid ←  02:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Please create an account! >Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 11:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Strong support You will be able to contribute much more effectively if you get an account. -Mschel 18:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Strong support. If you want to have full rights here, get an account! Jimbo Wales has written that users with "anonymous IP numbers do not have the same civil rights as logged in members of the community. If you want to be a good editor, get an account, make good edits." -- Jimbo Wales So get that account. -- Fyslee/talk 05:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support: Good god, get an account for god sake or maybe you like the limelight you're gathering here. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 02:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I reject that scurrility. 68.39.174.238 02:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Get One NOW: IPs are normally assumed to have low edit counts ... yours is higher than RFA candidates!! For the love of God, please create one. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 01:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Full Support per above:)) Caglarkoca 06:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Please Do - because I dont want to see an IP Becoming an Admin..----Cometstyles 21:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Everything Youre an ispiration to all of us, 68.39.174.238 - Please make an account ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 17:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  91. yay: so I can email function you, as well as not lose you in my watchlist. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 07:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Yes. ffm ✎talk 15:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Yes please! An IP doing an RfA would look weird... - G1ggy Talk/Contribs 23:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support, become an admin while yer at it :-). Tim{speak} 19:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support, and I will support you for adminship :) Sr13 04:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support - Over due to become an admin! --Hirohisat Talk 06:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support ~ Oh, for goodness sake. I just don't understand you people who persistently refuse to get a free account which can be registered within 5 minutes. An IP address hardly gives one any more anonimity than an account, or anything like that. I find it easier and more natural to talk to the person behind a memorable, pronouncable, username than the person behind a string of numbers and dots. If I aggravate you with this, sorry. vlad§inger tlk 14:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support: Anthony Appleyard 20:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support ack Vladsinger --Bencomplain 09:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support - You have to put fuel in a car to make it work. Rudget Contributions 18:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support - Get an account and we'll award you a cookie!
  102. Support ON WHEELS! PayneXKiller 04:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support - But hey don't get an account on my account! Sting_au | Talk 11:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support — excellent spam clean-up [1] --Oxymoron83 17:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support per Vladsinger   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support You have been nominated for admin once. Remember? Marlith T/C 01:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Please share a reference for that statement. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Where else? Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/68.39.174.238! (It was deleted intially, and may have been deleted again) There was also a "would like to" template False Prophet (Or whatever his name was, that was his signature) put on this page. 68.39.174.238 02:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Your RfA was created thrice, deleted twice and expired once. Why don't you want an account? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  107. For GOODNESS sakes man,just do it it wont hurt!!!! Esskater11 02:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Hell yeah!--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 21:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support! --HotAbs (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Go for it, you know you want to - even if you IP number is your account :-)
  111. Support. One day you will lose the IP address. ISPs change them. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 15:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Gwaaaan Or at least shove a public key on the page so when you lose the IP we know the real you... Pseudomonas(talk) 13:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Get one Now! RT | Talk 16:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Get a friggin' account! Shapiros10 (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  115. sixtyeight_thirtynine_onehundredandseventyfour_twohundredandthrityeight is as good a name as an IP, man --Enric Naval (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  116. THE STRONGEST SUPPORT. Basketball110 what famous people say 00:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  117. 9999999999999999999999999999999999% Support I would like you to become a member because you have valueable controbutions. — ComputerGuy890100 17:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  118. I can't nominate an IP for adminship :( Alexfusco5 23:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --Hadseys ChatContribs 02:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Yep MBisanz talk 08:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Come on dude/dudet! You would be an amazing Admin! If I were you I wouldn't be able to LIVE with myself until I got an account! Do Whatever You want to do, Your probably the best IP user! Cheerz! DarkZorro 14:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Hey, why not ...... Dendodge.TalkHelp 16:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Uh, duh 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 16:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  124. That would be REALLY nice.-- Freshbakedpie (Wanna talk?) \'_'/ 21:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Wow. just, wow. RC-0722 247.5/1 23:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Not having an account limits your ability to contribute to the project; for example 1) IPs cannot create new articles, 2) IPs cannot edit protected pages, 3) IPs cannot become admins, and 4) IPs often times do not receive as much respect as users with accounts do. Just get an account; I don't see any reason why you wouldn't want to. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    All IPs can incite new articels' creation, file for unprotection, cause administrators to work and repudiate illegitimacies (usually indirectly in the last case, sometimes in all cases). 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Even if you still edit from this one, we could still let you have the sysop tools already. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  128. I want you for adminship. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 00:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Hurry up and get one! SchfiftyThree 21:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Just do it! Enigma message 18:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Don't you want WP:SQUEEGEE...? IceUnshattered [ t ] 21:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Just get one, you will be happy!!!! Please get one!!NOWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!Mertozoro (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Frogger3140/vote Please get an account so you can edit semi-protected pages 5 days later after editing 10 or more articles. Otherwise, if you want me to edit a semi-protected page, just give me a message to which article. P.S. Join Wikipedia's Department of Fun if you want to make funny stuff. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Extremely strong support. Register an account. If you do then you're RFA would be successful. Great editor. Neptune5000 (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  135. GET AN ACCOUNT! Man, the wiki needs you! Vinson 01:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of users who do not want you to make an account[edit]

"Better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven."

If you urge 68.39.174.238 to not get an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylu (talk • contribs) {{User talk:68.39.174.238/noaccount}}

This user thinks 76.117.247.55 should not get an account.
  1. Support. Well me... some wikipedians seem to think that edits of anon nicks are somehow magically more trustworthy then anon IP’s, what’s the difference really... dynamic IP’s I think. Believe you make a fine statement here. - 80.134.200.171 18:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Support. Yeah, I'm sick of the users thing. The only thing it brings is people wanting to earn a reputation, POV and blog-like behaviour, "look my user is better than yours" 141.30.221.42 15:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – why mess with a good thing if it ain't broke? – Doug Bell talk•contrib 10:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Suppose that I should log in to sign this comment. 68.166.50.142 19:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC) (Ashibaka)[reply]
  5. Support. Give the guy/gal a break already David D. (Talk) 20:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I really would put myself as apathetic because I really don't care what you do and it really isn't any of my buisness, but I support your goal/opinion so here goes. Kotepho 01:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. This is a wiki and accounts are not required. I oppose the tendency of users with accounts to think that for some reason those human beings who haven't registered accounts with the WikiMedia Foundation are untrustworthy. -lethe talk + 16:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Strong Support. Thought it was just damn rude, saw on someones user page that they insisted you get a username, as if they were proud of it. What a jerk JayKeaton 17:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support or Oppose I'm so confused with what to put there! Keep your IP, who cares if you're not logged in. Still one of the best edittors on Wikipedia--Joe Jklin 16:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose! Don't conform to their standards! :P DakPow e rs (Talk) 21:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Fight the power! Bwa ha ha! Yar! Ahhhhhh! Ah... Ha. Zwooooooop! 69.145.123.171 Hello!
  12. Support That is, support your right to edit without an account name. This is, after all, "the free encyclopdia that anyone can edit". Anyone. --67.169.212.172 23:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support your opposition to making an account. You're legendary. Czj 04:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Agreed. Your non-conformity is a shining example of "WP:AGF towards IPs" to us all. I tip my hat and salute you Mr. 68 --  Netsnipe  ►  01:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support your stand. Whose business is this but yours? --Storkk 12:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support (or oppose, or whatever means I think you shouldn't get an account). I would have been neutral, but some of the comments in the "get an account" section scared me, with their zombie-like cries of "join us, join us!" I felt like I was watching one of the Evil Dead movies. Don't do it! Don't drink the Kool-Aid! :) -- Xtifr 01:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. No account You have made over 14,000 edits without an account, why start now? Laur ə nwhisper 20:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I'd rather see you earn the title of all-time leader in total edits under a single anonymous IP, which, at the time of this writing, is held by 202.156.6.54 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) with 20049 edits. Scobell302 02:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That is hardly the same thing. 202.156.6.54 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is an ISP, with quite a few users, and a hell of a lot of blocks. vlad§inger tlk 14:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. No account needed - All of us here should be judged by our editing record, alone. - Mauco 04:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. You are so cool I was doing the same thing you're doing before I found out I had a dynamic IP. Don't give up to peer pressure!! --JDitto 03:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. you = amazing Maddox 21:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  22. Whatever Makes You Happy - Uhnkay? -- weirdoactor t|c 14:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. No account needed - why spoil the romance? Moreschi Request a recording? 20:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose. However, being an anon hides your identity. —  Mete oroid  ←  02:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. support I think i really like the idea of an ip being one of wikipedias best vandal fighters--Fang 23 18:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. support Fight the Wikielitism! Too much snobism with usernames.Blue Leopard 05:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. Cogent example to all. --Gwern (contribs) 00:35 19 April 2007 (GMT)
  28. Support YOU ARE ANONYMOUS, YOU ARE LEGION. --Saint-Paddy 03:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support There's something special about it when you don't even have an account. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 22:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support, as the ultimate argument for why anon IPs must always be allowed to edit Wikipedia. I'm actually an established user myself, but I'm voting here as a logged-out IP as a respectful homage to your greatness. 82.41.24.45 02:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support It wouldn't be the same if you were just another username-d contributor, another pixel in the ubiquitous sea of established users. Your IP-ness is what makes you special, don't throw it away! --Ye Olde Luke 06:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Oppose. The time to get an account was a long, long, long time ago, and it would be pointless now. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 08:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Stay anonymous. Otherwise you won't be associated with all your existing contributions. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 15:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Stay the course Fight the bigotry power. 74.133.9.95 (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose You are unique in IP addresses. I would stay as you are now. But, of course, you are you. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 04:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose - Don't give in to them :) --Laveol T 22:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of users, anonymous or otherwise, who really don't care[edit]

"Indifference is the essence of humanity."

If you don't care if 68.39.174.238 makes an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! {{User talk:68.39.174.238/dontcare}}

This user does not care if 68.39.174.238 76.117.247.55 gets an account.
  • Ambivolent. 69.236.184.108 11:51, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral— I rather like the irony of an IP address being among our best antivandals. S/he or they should make a userpage, though. ;) // Pathoschild 07:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - you may change your mind on signing up someday, and it won't matter. P.S. You can make a user page too, even without a registered username! Kimchi.sg | talk 01:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • French Toast At least stick a userbox on your userpage or something. Vandal patrol maybe? ~Kylu (u|t) 06:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't Care I really don't see why everyone is so bent out of shape over one Annon who edits without mercy, yet never once considers the advantages of having a user account. Oh well, if s/he only wants casterated editing privilages, more power to him. Avador 05:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unsure Well, what we want to defend is the ability of anonymous users to edit. You have an identity (which is the scourge of modern society as far as I'm concerned -- well, at least you don't have some godawful user page). You can't very well point at your contributions and say, "See?" because if unregistered editing were turned off, people like you would just get an account. So no loss. What has been proven? On the other hand, I don't know of a better way to make your point, and I do think it needs to be made, because the way things are, unregistered editing is slowly getting more and more restricted. So, I am unsure. 70.30.114.149 01:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Normally would strongly advise you to, but I'm not sure now. See User and Talk:69.145.123.171. —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♫-) 19:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Heh. Makes wikihead minds asplode. Derex 10:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indifferent :) Dylan Lake 04:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apathetic Per membership of AAW[2]--Tlim7882 14:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongly apathetic. It is difficult to express the magnitude of my uncaringness! --moof 07:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not even going to bother with the fourth tilde ˉˉanetode╦╩
  • NPOVed Not only do I not care, but if I lean one way or the other on this issue then I will be forever biased and incapable of further legitimate comment. Therefore, I am decidedly and vehemently taking on a stance of neutrality. Also, I believe that this IS an account, but with the name of the user's IP. Welcome, mysterious IP stranger. --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 14:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's up to you buddy! Great job! I'll be like you in a while! Dreamy 21:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't even KNOW you, so I don't care, do whatever you want with your life, LIVE FREE, BE HAPPY!!!!!! AHAHAHAHAHA Please, tell me how to make my page!! PLZ!! To help Wikipeep 494 make his page, please click here. Please. 04:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Amused Pseudonymonous IP addresses, who would've thunk? You must also be a geek to find this amusing. I'd find it too annoying not being able to revert vandalism I saw on sprotected pages, but hey, to each their own! Cheers, Pro crast in a tor 23:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Totally don't care!!! You don't have to if you don't want to if you ask me. I don't care. If you get an account,I won't care. Just because he's a very good editor,he has to have an account? If you are squeamish about crediting to him because he is not registered user,I suggest you get over that. His life,his business. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doesn't matter. There are other editors who contribute anonymously after all. Do what you want. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 15:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't give a f@ck Why am I reading this? SpinningSpark 22:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I like pie - Brainmachine (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • 21 126% Neutral; it's up to you. I have no control over your mind (not that I can control anyone's mind anyway...). -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 03:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh Gentgeen (talk) 12:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well done! Keep it up. Yours, 130.88.0.34 (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of users, anonymous or otherwise, who think it's none of their business[edit]

"He who is a good neighbor keeps a controlled nose."

If you think that it's none of your business if 68.39.174.238 gets an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylu (talk • contribs) {{User talk:68.39.174.238/noneofmybusiness}}

This user thinks it's none of their business if 68.39.174.238 gets an account.
  • In Between I've seen the work you've done, and I have to say, I'm quite impressed—especially concerning reverting vandalism. You've contributed a lot to Wikipedia :). I just wanted to say, I do want you to make an account but I also am also, at the same time, won over by your strong resolve that you're not creating an account to show us Wikipedians that not all IP addresses are vandals or such, and won't make an account to as you said, "to satisfy such people" and/or to become an admin. Because of your resolve, I have much respect for your decision (even if I disagree with it) and hereby support your choice either way. —Mirlen 05:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely, completely, your choice. I respect whatever decision you make. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a free wiki, you do what you're comfortable with! bd2412 T 22:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • YA RLY --Ted 23:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do whatever you want to do not what other people tell you to do
  • none of my business but i havent got a clue how i got to this page it scares me--Childzy 21:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's cool if you don't want to be narcissistic like the rest of us. Or perhaps your name is really 68.39.174.238. Not that there's anything wrong with that. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 03:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm completely indifferent as to whether or not you get an account...although it makes you seem like on of those huge silent thugs called Five or Zero or something :) Anthøny 15:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I should file for that and see what the Registrar says! 68.39.174.238 12:23, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Live and let live, I say. Cheers! -GTBacchus(talk) 01:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think you definitely shouldn't get an account, but I'm putting myself under none of my business, because it's none of my business. CiaranG 20:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • None of my business. Just keep typing.  :-) SWAdair | Talk 06:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • NoMB. Kirils 01:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's up to you, but I wanted to support you in your protest against IP vandals ;) --203.109.243.5 13:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC) (User:Peppery in disguise!)[reply]
  • I respect your right to make your own choices. Thank you for your good efforts. DavidCBryant 20:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do your thing. The way each person wants to contribute, is the best way for them. Provided it's not vandalism, and somehow I don't think you're a vandal ;) James086Talk 13:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anyone who would tell you what to do is a meddlesome pain in the ass--my definition (on a good day) for what a Wikipedian is. Get an account or not. It's all the same to me. I wish I had remained an anon IP. Jeffpw 20:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Its up to you. You're doing a great job! Keep at it! xC | ☎ 19:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, you're a person, and people should be able to do as they like. It's totally up to you! In my opinion, just 'cause you're using an IP instead of an account doesn't make you different! Ryan Got something to say? 13:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think it would be great if you got an account, but it is your life. Live like you want. --Random Say it here! 01:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like if you got one, just so you don't show up on recent changes when I hide logged-iin users, but getting the best anon on Wikipedia to create an account is approximately #51,243 on my priority list. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • What gives? Who cares about usernames anyway? Just don't be peer pressured, that's all I can say. Keep up the great work. — *H¡ρρ¡ ¡ρρ¡ 15:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can not believe that so many people seem genuinely concerned that such a prolific editor does not have an account. Who cares? Leave him or her alone. — DIEGO talk 06:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm an Anarchist. Do what you like - all of you! Saudade7 04:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stop badgering her/him! This is a good editor whether they have an account or not. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 15:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether he gets an account or not is his business, not ours. Medieval Man 21:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep it up '68.39.174.238' Don't let these badgers get to you — Relyimah (t-c-e) 10:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are helping Wikipedia; you can choose whether you want an account Anonymous101 (talk) 18:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely your choice, but have you considered registering as user:68.39.174.238? "I am not a number, you are a free ???" Jonathan Cardy (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware it was possible to register an IP address as a username... I wouldn't've thought the software would allow it... 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can't register a username with only numbers, but IP addresses have dots in the middle, don't they? You could try registering with a random string of numbers separated be dots to see of it would work. Or maybe you've already tried. Joshua Issac (talk) 11:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose account creation. You can create a username with numbers and dots. See this request for administrator status. The person has no userpage, no contributions, no anything, though. Maybe the feature is disabled now. I changed my vote again, by the way. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.39.174.238/Account_debate&oldid=1147986160"