User talk:222.164.212.168

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles[edit]

Pending approval[edit]

To be created[edit]

222.164.212.168 (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello 222.164.212.168! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 05:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

November 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of districts of Haryana has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of districts of Haryana was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.censusindia.co.in/subdistrict/badhra-tehsil-bhiwani-hariyana-403) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Chief petty officer have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Chief petty officer was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.mapsofindia.com/my-india/government/indian-navy-ranks-career-and-recruitment-process) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Khagrachhari District. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Rangamati Hill District. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reference to Wikipedia articles[edit]

Just follow the steps as shown, and fill in the details

Hello 222.164.212.168! Please do not forget to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Adding well-formatted references is easy.

  1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite". Click on it.
  2. Then click on "templates".
  3. Choose the most appropriate template and then fill all relevant details.

This will add a well-formatted reference, which will allow other people to see where you got your information from. You can read more about this at Help:Edit toolbar, or watch this video: File:RefTools.ogv. Thanks and regards. —DBigXrayᗙ 14:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DBigXrayᗙ 14:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Sentinelese have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Sentinelese was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7BNwmVvk6g) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

In response to your message on my talk page, TSP is actually the one who restored your edits; anyhow, thank you for your edits! Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhadas, Haryana has been accepted[edit]

Bhadas, Haryana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 13:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Nahar Singh Faridabad Air Force Logistics Station has been accepted[edit]

Raja Nahar Singh Faridabad Air Force Logistics Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Encounter. Home Lander (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed none of he entries on that aricle have a source within the article. My enrty was no different from other entries. Anyway, I am reinserting the entry with "piping" to Encounter killings by police this time around. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Puneet Sharma[edit]

Just a friendly heads up on Puneet Sharma. The article meets the requirements of WP:NACADEMIC, so it definitely meets the lower standard needed to avoid speedy deletion.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Highway 152D (India) has been accepted[edit]

National Highway 152D (India), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolgaon, Haryana has been accepted[edit]

Kolgaon, Haryana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cesdeva (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moolthan has been accepted[edit]

Moolthan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cesdeva (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Asigarh Fort have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Asigarh Fort was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://haryanaheritage.blogspot.com/2013/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Information icon Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Princely states of Pakistan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=21&v=Yfx-m4fX3Is) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Diwata has been accepted[edit]

Mount Diwata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhirawati has been accepted[edit]

Bhirawati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mangar Bani has been accepted[edit]

Mangar Bani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neela Hauz biodiversity park has been accepted[edit]

Neela Hauz biodiversity park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:56, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yamuna biodiversity park has been accepted[edit]

Yamuna biodiversity park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 18:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (222.164.212.168) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! --Gpkp (u • t • c) 18:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tilpath Valley Biodiversity Park has been accepted[edit]

Tilpath Valley Biodiversity Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Newslinger talk 09:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northern ridge biodiversity park has been accepted[edit]

Northern ridge biodiversity park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 18:39, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sport in Haryana (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Rather flowery language.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 19:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 222.164.212.168! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering(t) 19:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sport in Haryana (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of people from Haryana#Sports instead.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is mostly a list of people so it should go to the list that already exists for this purpose. The verbiage concerning state-wide teams can go to the Haryana#Sports article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bass, Hansi has been accepted[edit]

Bass, Hansi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 << FR (mobileUndo) 18:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Indian Navy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Gazoth (talk) 16:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I will review and reinsert later after rephrasing, rediting, etc. I think you might be referring to already existing material icoped from another article. Anyway I will recheck both articles later and clean up the errant article first (someone else's work) from which I had copied from and fix both my new insert and the soruce wiki article. Thanks or pointing out.

222.164.212.168 (talk) 19:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition[edit]

On 29 January 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article George Fernandes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I will try. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Cedric White. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor of Medicine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Cedric White (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi Cedric White,
1. Please justify how was my edit unconstructive?
2. If your objection was that it was unsourced, then there are many unsourced sections within the Doctor of Medicine. Either remove those pre-existing unsourced sections first or let my edit remain in there. Either way, apply the criteria/rules i.e. remove all unsourced content before removing my edit or retain my edit in the article.
3. Plese be very careful in using automated tools to revert works of others as it "wastes productive time" in dicussions/undoing/redoing while causing avoidable unpleasantness.
4. If you believe you made a mistake then please resotre my edits. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 11:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought the edit was unsourced but I didn't know that Doctor of Medicine has many unsourced sections. I have restored your edits.Cedric White (talk) 11:39, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cedric White. FYI, my edits to Doctor of Medicine are copied and condensed from the pre-existing unsourced edits to Medical_college_in_India#Postgraduate_courses where they have surived for a long time. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have been contributing to Wikipedia from IP since December. You have also created few articles so why don't you create an account so that you can access many features.Cedric White (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not want to get addicted to anything, including wikipedia. Getting emotionally attached to the "apps and platforms" creates ego, stress, etc. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 15:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manethi has been accepted[edit]

Manethi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Gpkp. Please review other pending draft articles of mine: Bharawas, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari and Uttar Pradesh sand mining scam during SP rule. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome 222.164.212.168. I have come across many well written drafts from you. Why dont you create an account? --Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ambala Cantonment. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Fylindfotberserk, I had added sourced material to the previously unsourced sections, which is in any case is an improvement over what was prior to my edits. Please apply your review criteria consistently and pragmatically in such a way that it takes the article forward in a collaborative manner. You are welcome to further rephrase my edits instead of simply reverting. Because, the blanket reverts take the article backwards by perepetually keeping it unsourced, moreover why have you kept the unsouced text there because my edits were at least sourced? Please refrain from the inconsistent application of criteria and reverts based on such inconsistent criteria. Such reverts accompanied by such messages on my talkpage also discourage the "incremental mutually collaborative" approach. Please either restore my edits, or please feel free to rephrase those i.e. show pragmatic intent to collaborate. Thank you. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 15:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1) Your source doesn't support this

Ambala Army Cantonment Base is currently the headquarters of II Corps (India) (raised in 1970, formation sign Kharga) and an important forward Indian Air Force base. It played an important role during the 1965 and 1971 war between India and Pakistan. Ambala Air Force Station is adjacent to the Army Cantonment. It has several colonial bungalows and wide tree-lined roads, typical of British cantonments in the subcontinent. It also gets a mention in the Rudyard Kipling book Kim

Fylindfotberserk: I did not insert this material. I had simply moved this pre-existing unsourced material from one section to another as part of reorganizing the text differently. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2) Where did you find this

Oral tradition avers that the city is named after the hindu feale deity Amba, whose temple built by the Pandavas of Mahabharata of [[[Vedia era]] still exists in Ambala city

in your source? That's original research.

222.164.212.168 (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fylindfotberserk: Simply insert the not supported by citation tag, and wait for editors to supply the citation. There is no need to throw the baby with bath water by reverting the whole thing. In case you have further interest in this topic you could additionally strat a discussion on the article talk page. FYI, Ambala is only 41 km or 12 Kos from Kurukshetra - the land Pandavas. Ambala is within 48 kos parikrama of Kurukshetra (see also Amba (Mahabharata)). Hence, that unsupported statement you pointed out is highly plausible, best to insert tag to ask for citation. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not mix sourced and unsourced content. Keep the unsourced content separate. Delete it or leave it with a [cn] tag. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk: Do not just revert. Revert is like the gun in a cop's hand. BRD/revert should be used as last resort in case of deadlock or deliberate vandalism. BRD/revert is a gun which cops/editors can not use in Dirty Harry (character) style. Editors have to first try to collaborate, enhance eachother's edits and take more pragmatic approach. Out of several edits, you pointed only one valid minor issue i.e. one sentence unsupported by the citation. And, you decided to throw out the baby with the bath water by reverting everything? Instead of reverts, please use tags like not supported in citation or provide more relibale citation. Be more consistent in applying review criteria to the whole article and to all editors of that article, be fair, collaborative, more humble and friendlier. It would have taken you lot less time to collaborate with me on that article by inserting not supported by the citation tag (give them a chance to find citation) instead of tagging other editors with antagonising things (such as "OR", "synthesis", etc) only to take the the article back to the unsourced state. This does not come across good. It comes across that you are doing similar type of multiple things which are you are asking me not to do. I am happy to learn from this experience but please show me the same humility, willingness to learn and collaborate. For now restore my edits, insert the appropriate tags and feel free to remove items not supported by citations (or add the tag for me/others to find citations later). We should be spending more time on the article, not here. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to contribute, do it properly. Mixing sourced and unsourced content together messes up the things much more. Moreover you have added enough "synthesis" to warrant a revert. I've large number of pages in my watchlist so I don't have enough time to check each and every sentence and to tag unsourced content or "OR" content. I however checked and modified your edits on the Ambala city article. As for this article, I'm removing notable peoples and etymology which are not relevant here. You can add other things supported by your source but remember not to synthesize. And do not add Mythology. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fylindfotberserk: You keep bringing things that I have not done (as in a violaiton). Among all of the things you have said, only one of your assertion is correct (one unsupported statement, which you could have easily dealt with by inserting a tag asking for citation). "Prominent people" section which I created, is again not the "new text introduced by me". I simply moved the pre-existing text and put it under another heading. If you are playing the role of a reviewer, then please take time to properly review and not keep jumping the gun. If you have too many article to watch, then trim your list. Do a good job with less number of articles, instead of doing a shoddy "jump the gun" job with many articles, which also anatagonises other editors as well as wastes too much time of all stakeholders. You seem to be stressed because of this. Please look after yourself first and take time out away from wikipedia. Please practice what you preach (pointing out others mistake is okay, please start fixing yours too), be more selective in watching the pages, be more thorough and consistent in your review (put more effort/time in each review to ensure things you point out to others actually hold up). Thank you for finally collaborating with me on Ambala article. I will take note of your suggesstions too. Hope you pay heed to mine as well. Whatever you do, please try to do it in a way which is pleasant to all. There are no bosses on wikipedia, including those with tools (tools do not give an editor superior rights over an IP). We all are equal on wikipedia, let us all reflect this in our attitude. Thank you. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't understand why you have to lengthen this discussion so much. As I said, you add "original research", it gets reverted. By me or by some other editor. Adding Mythology is a big no-no without right sources. I told you to re-add some of your edits back that are sourced. But now you have deleted things that are sourced or otherwise have Wikipedia articles e.g. Census data, Indian Army and Airforce Base, European Cemetery, etc. Add those back.
  • Etymology and Notable people section are not relevant here. I know you have sorted them but those things should be in the Ambala city article.
  • And I didn't warn or comment on your Ambala article edits where you have put a lot of "original researches" e.g the following text is not in the source.

Nada Sahib (named after Nada Shah who was a deciple of Guru Govind Singh, 2 km south east of Panchkula), Lakhnaur Sahib (native place of Mata Gujri mother of Guru Goivind Singh, has a charpai belonging to Guru Govind Singh, 6 kilometres south of Ambala), Panjokhra Sahib (visited by the 8th guru of Sikhs Guru Har Krishan, 8 km east of Ambala) and Haryoli (temple of Rishis Markandeya hold an annul fair in September-COtober where he meditated to lord Shiva at the age of 12, located 15 km to southeast of Ambala Cantt) are the popular ancient religious sites.[2]

as well as the mention of "Tomara Rajputs" and the "time periods" which are all syntheses. Other editors are not hear to cleanup all the mess everytime.
  • And for the last time, be more objective on the talk page instead of writing essays preaching what other wikipedians should do. Seems like harassment. See WP:TALK#USE - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fylindfotberserk: If you have issues, list them all in one go. Do not keep adding more once you lose arguments, because you are doing a very shoddy job of reviewing in very inconsistent way. This comes across as arrogance. Simply because you have some tools. You came to my talkpage to slap this and that, I have never visisted your talkpage me. You are the one who come across who likes to preach to others but feels he is above the wikipedia rules. Going by your confession above, you have subscribed to more articls than you can do justice to, which is making you ineffective (to the extent of being disruptive and non-collaborstive to other editors) and stressed (which comes across as frustrated and arrogant person acting like a dirty harry cop). I can run a list of all your edits and find 100 times more flaws in your edits, such tricks are useless. Better stick to the topic at hand in a constructive manner, just make separate discussion on each article talk page you find issues with. Stop stalking/harassing me. Stop holier than thou attitude. Please be humble enough to accept things you need to improve as well. If you have no time to review others articles properly, then stop killing otheres edits, just unscibcribe pages to a manageable list. If you have no time to read replies then do not leave "jump the gin" kind of comments on others talk page. I wanted to see from you that you are willing to be flexible and open to adopt to rules. Please start demonstrating it. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari[edit]

Please stop linking to All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari. First, I suggest writing the article first. Second, this is way to early. The institute was only announced and it may take years until it operates. See All India Institutes of Medical Sciences for further information and examples. For example AIIMS Gorakhpur was announced in 2014 and still does not operate and has no article. I am not saying that it because other articles don't exist, I am saying that an institute which was just announced fails the general notability guidelines. Maybe in a few months it will be notable. --Muhandes (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Muhandes, thanks for informing me.
Summary: I disagree with omission of my edit because seems you might have made an error of judgment as the draft article already exists and it as an entity also already exists legally (no longer a future event). Please reinstate my edits.
Details:
1. I had already created a daft aritcle first before listing it in the list of institutes. Please click the redlink and then click the blue link to access the pre-existing draft of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari. It is supported by the verifible independent naitonal newspapers citations, and it is of widespread interest to several northern states.
2. Let us not confuse the "announcement" (e.g. speculation, presumption, people's demand, politician's empty promise) vs "physical infrastructure" vs "legal existence" (courts, UN and most nations honor/accept this legal basis). The institute was announced several years ago. It was legally approved recently i.e. the institute now exists legally (can operate, lend, borrow, hire, fire, constuct, rent, or run virtually, etc), not a speculation or politician's vote-fetching empty promise, which settles the argument. If something exists in law, please retain those edits. You can add a note/caveat to clarify specisl considerations, like you have done for some other articles with the use of special characters as legends/footnotes.
3. You mentioned WP:CRYSTAL to reject my edit. Please read carefully what WP:CRYSTAL says below, and then re-read point-1&2 above. You will notice that my edits did not violate WP:CRYSTAL. Rather, WP:CRYSTAL supports my edits and it refutes your reasons to reject my edits. "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation or presumptions. Wikipedia does not predict the future. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced."
4 I like to believe that you probably would have accepted my edit, only if you had clicked on the draft article redlink. Please reintroduce my edits (if you wish, with footnotes). Please all future edits that exist in the law. Will be a great help, if you can please, also review/approve my draft article on All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari. Thanks. 14:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
I obviously saw your draft and even edited it before I wrote any of this. You may notice my comment on the talk page. I obviously looked at the sources and I disagree that they satisfy the general notability requirements. Legal statue has never been a source for notability. This is not just about the Rewari institute, it applies to all 13 proposed AIIMSs. Once an institute starts operation, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES may apply, although that is not an argument to keep an article either. Anyway, all this has nothing to do with WP:WTAF. If/once the article is accepted, it can/will be linked. --Muhandes (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Muhandes. Which one of the 5 bullted general notability requirements is not met (to me, all have been met)? 222.164.212.168 (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The first. --Muhandes (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharawas has been accepted[edit]

Bharawas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hitro talk 09:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Heo Hwang-ok, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Heo Hwang-ok is a legend, not a historical person, and there's absolutely no proof for her having ever existed. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas.W changes to lede already pre-exists in the article. Please do not revert all edits, instead retain good edits (piping, sourced edit) and improve. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heo Hwang-ok[edit]

Hello again. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fanblog, so everything that is added must be sourced, and the article can only say what the sources say. The year of birth you added has been removed, since the only one of the three sources for it that you added that is verifiable, the short blurb at BBC.com, does not mention any year of birth! - Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas.W "married the king in the year 48 CE at her age of 16 years.[1][2]", apply reasonable commonsense, e.g. see "the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person". 222.164.212.168 (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The first source is a Korean book that isn't verifiable, and the second source has no mention of Heo Hwang-ok, anyone being sixteen years old or anyone marrying in 48AD, making me believe that you haven't checked the sources you've added. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas.W You can instead use this, page2, para2. I noticed, you already made change. Also, avoid pushing own contntious unsourced POV, e.g. "legend" or "claied to be". "Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fanblog, so everything that is added must be sourced". Practice what you preach.222.164.212.168 (talk) 19:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We do not present legend as fact. Period. There is absolutely nothing that supports that Heo Hwang-ok was a real historical person, and there's even less that supports that she came from India (that claim is based only on a single individual in Korea feeling that "Ayodhya" sounds a bit like "Ayotha"...). So the article should clearly state that it is a legend, not present it as a historical fact. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misreprsentation of sources[edit]

Hello, I happened to stumble upon some of your edits, and found several instances where you've grossly mispresented sources (not to mention the poor quality of sources). Some examples:

  • Here you claimed that "Sultan Nasir ud din Mahmud ... plundered Pinjore and destroyed Hindu temples in 1254 CE". The source cited by you only states "At the beginning of this year victories and spoils were gained in the vicinity of the mountains of Bardar and Pinjor".
  • In same edit, you added the claim that "Pinjore was once again plundered and hindu temples destroyed by the musli [sic] forces of Timur". The source that you cited doesn't mention the word "Hindu temples" in this context: all it says is "The place was again plundered in A.D. 1399 by Timur on his way back from Delhi"
  • Here you added the claim that the "Akharas [...] evolved into the fighting martial akharas likely as a reaction to the harsh and brutal treatment of Hindus by the Muslim Rulers", citing pg. 127 of Mark Tully's No Full Stops in India as your source. The source doesn't mention anything like this.

Plus, there are several instances when you've copy-pasted content from one article to another without actually checking the sources (or bothering about the relevance of the content to the new article. E.g. here you copy-pasted a lot of sources from Madja-as and Srivijayan and Madjapahit cultural influences in early Philippine polities to San Dionisio, Iloilo: these sources do not even mention San Dionisio, and it is quite obvious that you haven't read these sources. Same goes for Mount Diwata, where you copied a lot of sources from Laguna Copperplate Inscription: you obviously did not read the sources, but you used them as references for several new sentences meant to support your POV, although these sources do not support these sentences. This behaviour is not right, as already discussed earlier when you were editing from another StarHub Cable IP address (202.156.182.84).

Several of your poor edits seem to have gone unnoticed, because many others only check that you're adding sources without verifying whether those sources actually support the content that you're adding.

You have already been given several warnings about addition of unsourced content and original research above (and at User talk:202.156.182.84). If you continue this behavior, you will end up getting blocked notwithstanding the other good contributions you have made. utcursch | talk 01:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uttar Pradesh sand mining scandal has been accepted[edit]

Uttar Pradesh sand mining scandal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari (March 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Too soon.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
∯WBGconverse 09:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Nauchandi Mela[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ―Susmuffin Talk 21:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sport in Haryana[edit]

Hello, 222.164.212.168. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sport in Haryana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Murrah buffalo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Tolly4bolly 05:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Draft:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari[edit]

Hello, 222.164.212.168. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "All India Institute of Medical Sciences".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Aranya. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bumiputera (Malaysia) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Aranya (talk) 10:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bumiputera (Malaysia). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —Aranya (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is not vandalism, current headings are uselessly vague. I have made reedits. I also left a note on your talkpage. We both were editign at same time. Use collaborative approach instead of revert or warnings. Review/rephrase my new changes. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 11:10, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My message did not say it is vandalism. It referred to the neutrality and tone of the edited content. Additionally, using reverts and warnings can absolutely be part of a collaborative approach to improving articles. It seems we have reached a local consensus on the content at this time, so the matter is closed. Best regards and happy editing.—Aranya (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aranya Thanks for the collaboration. I will update that article later, help me, dont have to repost here, just rephrase what you think it unbiased, "do not make it nutral", harsh uncomfortable facts go in. Thanks you. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 12:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Aranya: I had not seen your first advisory with blue "BLUE i" label because I was still editing that article, and within 2 minutes you left another message as warning with "RED i" label. I have not had the chance to see advistory, but as soon as I saw both yoru messages together after few more minutes, the matter was resolved immediately. Usually there should be ample time gap between advisory and warning to allow the recipient sufficient time to read, react and correct before issuing a hasty warning. Sicne I had not had chance to see advisory, both were issued in quick succession and I understand why it happened so no problem, and matter was immediately resolved, so I ask you to please withdraw/retract your warning. Thanks for the understanding. I will try to add mroe content to that article later, I will tag you for you to review, so as to avoid any future editorial differences. I feel that article is incomplete, could be rephrased more crisply, etc, I will further work on it, please keep revisiting that oen to review/enhgance my work. Thanks. Regards. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 04:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 222.164.212.168, thank you for contacting me again. I thought this matter was already closed? We seem to have reached a consensus on the edits previously made to the Bumiputera (Malaysia) article, which were discussed more than two weeks ago (as shown above). While other users have given you new messages here on this talk page, I have not written to you any new warnings or message since then. Are there any new developments that you would like to discuss? Cheers. – Aranya (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Beastranger (talk · contribs), I had previously edited and enhanced Divisions of Haryana article, bulk of work is mine. Anyway, in what way do you find my new edits disruptive? You have not provided any specifics. I just finished editing after spending hours, and you reverted within a minute or two, which makes me think you jumpedd the gun and might not have even properly reviewed the edits. Also refrain from issuing warnings with vague reasons (specially when yuou have not spent sufficient time to properly review the edits and have no actionable specifics/corrective measures), and issue an advisory first. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 09:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I extend my apologies for reverting your edit as I reverted this one where the opening sentence ("This article covers the political and administrative divisions of Haryana as well as the Regions of Haryana based on language and ethnicity") does not match with Wikipedia's encyclopedic tone. Your first edit significantly improves the article whereas your second one doesn't.
I used twinkle to revert your first edit but as you mentioned in my talk page, I didn't as you say "Jumped the gun" since the script reverts any consecutive edits made by the target IP and restores the version that IP didn't work on. So the edit was a accidental revert and I extended my apologies. I do not discriminate any Wikipedia user be it an SYSOP or an IP user since every edit improves Wikipedia. Kindly consider creating an account where you can get many tools and learn tricks to edit Wikipedia effectively Beastranger (talk) 12:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Dear Beastranger (talk · contribs),
Thanks you for the response, for reverting the accidental warning as well as for explainign how the automated tool twinkle works (good to know if similar situation arises with someone else). I have left a follow up response on your talkpage as well for the closure.
I did consider the following:
Reamining IP (PROS: less wiki addiction, less notifications, more peace, more "real life". CONS: sometimes being treated as second class editor, less privacy due to IP address)
vs
Becoming Registerted User (PROS: More tools and automation of tasks, recognition an d better treartment from fellow editors, more privacy as IUP address is masked by the regiustered account. CONS: one more app means more notifications and less real life, notifications make it harder to disentangle/walk away from editorial disagreements, more wiki addiction, etc).
Personal tradeoff: For now sticking with being IP to maintain a reasonable distance from wikipedia while still be able to contribute.
Regarding Divisions of Haryana: Thanks for your enhancements to my edits. I have created a discussion on the talk page of that article, so we can benefit from the input from other editors too, please rejoin me there to continue our collaboration. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 04:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Keep up the good work. You can also visit WP:INB for suggestions.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Raam Raam bhai Fylindfotberserk (talk · contribs), "ke gyan s". Thanks for the kitty. Have an amazing weekend, "kacche kaat". Cheers! 222.164.212.168 (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ram Ram Bhai. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Establishment-Pakistan[edit]

The Establishment (Pakistan) has not been deleted. a) click on it; b) go to top of the page; c) click on 3rd line (the bold part): (Redirected from The Establishment (Pakistan)) OK --you can now edit the article. Rjensen (talk) 04:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rjensen (talk · contribs) Thank you so much. You are so patient, kind and very helpful. What a delightful experience to have come across you. My heartfelt gratitude for you. Regards.
PS: I manged to find the new The Establishment (Pakistan) article, have removed the redirect, once I build it up using my earlier edits reverted by the IP vandal, I will pipe the global article to this Pakistan-specific article. It might take me several iterations over next few weeks to continue to build and refine Pakistani Establishment, i.e. article in the meantime might not be robust quality. I will try to enlist help from other editors to help me build it. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
happy to help. please register. Rjensen (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
:) Sometimes I am tempted to, but I have resisted for these reasons, easier to walk away and/or emotionally distance from wikipedia and editorial disputes, happy editing obscure articles that hardly anyone cared for previously (instead of getting entangled with contentious articles), editing only for leisure/hobby and not for championing ideology/causes/agenda, etc. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 05:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
a name allows you to get a LOT more respect. Rjensen (talk) 05:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
True. I will slowly try to ease into it with time. Instead of lone ranging, I will start inviting slected 2 or 3 editors (whom I feel comfortable with) to help me build articles. :) 222.164.212.168 (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lets collaborate[edit]

Dear Beastranger (talk · contribs) and Fylindfotberserk (talk · contribs),
1. I have just created The Establishment (Pakistan) which feeds in to the "Global" The Establishment article. Global article has too many nations in it, can accomodate only a short summary of Pakistan. Hence, a separate article was needed for Pakistan. The newly created article is my first cut. Still messy and incomplete. I will continue to refine further. Meanwhile please add it to your watchlist and help in finetuning it. I might get busy elsewhere during the weekend, surely will come to it during the week.
2. Also add Political families of Haryana and protect Criticism of dynastic political clans of Haryana (I wrote this section, needs more supporting citations, etc) and have expanded the list of dynasts with citations after days of research. Since elections are on in Haryana, please watch against people disgustingly embellishing/glorifying dynasties or diluting/deleting dynasties' mutual connections/networking (Aapsi Mili Bhagat).
3. With the addition of Divisions of Haryana, this makes it 3 articles I wish to collaborate with you to make those more robust.
Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 08:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work there @The Establishment (Pakistan). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Once we mature @The Establishment (Pakistan) article, we might migrate some of the content to the "currently protected" (hence I cant edit it easily) Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism. Within the The Establishment (Pakistan) article we could keep the text "limited/related" to the "nonstate actors", where as Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism has much wider scope, that is how I see it.
PS: How about this, read this too "yo bi chokha likha s tere bhai ne", I'm sure you would love it. hahaha 222.164.212.168 (talk) 09:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Ghana chokha banaa yo article" - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I added the templates where you mentioned and further insert templates (you can see here) instead of text. Regards Beastranger (talk) 12:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More articles: pls review and add to your watch list (31 Oct)[edit]

Dear Beastranger (talk · contribs) and Fylindfotberserk (talk · contribs),

I have edited the following, please review and add the main (and related) articles to your watchlist, since I am not always around.

  • List_of_active_separatist_movements_in_Asia#Malaysia and Terrorism in Malaysia (still need to add a section on state sponsored terrorism e.g. Moro Muslim insurgency in Mindanao in Southern Philippines, and include support for the designated terrorist Zakir Nailk): I will write a separate article on it along the lines of article on Trukey above, as well as Human Rights, Palm Oil Industry, Persecution of Chinese/Indian minority ethnicity as well as institutionalised discrimination of non-muslims (Chinese Buddhist and Christians and Indian Hindus/Sikhs) and non-Sunni Muslims (shia and Ahmadiya), Constitutional Regional discrimination against Sabah and Sarawak regions/states,

Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@222.164.212.168: Greetings, Your edit is commendable but you cannot link headings and sub-headings with wikipedia articles. You can refer to this MOS:LINKSTYLE for any guidance. On a broader note kindly go through this fully WP:MOS and all its sub page guidelines, since you're constructively creating and expanding articles. Regards Beastranger (talk) 13:21, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, got it. Thank you for letting me know. Regards. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Beastranger (talk · contribs) and Fylindfotberserk (talk · contribs), my ISP has dynamically reassigned my IP address. Posting this is message from my new IP address. Please tag my new IP in future messages. Thanks. 58.182.172.95 (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for notifying us. Don't you think, at this point you should create an account? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message[edit]

You have new message. Click here

Naya message. here

October 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of think tanks in India appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 07:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Dear GermanJoe,
Thanks for informing me. Indian government has the formal elite classification in the following decreasing order (I have added the "list of these organisations" in the "see also" section of the article):
A. Institutes of Eminence,
B. Institutes of National Importance,
C. Autonomous Institutes.
All the institutes I have added, they fall under these 3 official elite categories. For example, Please note that those think tanks based within "O.P. Jindal University" or "Kurukshetra University" are notable by virtue of these university being on the official list of the "Institute of eminence" (top level formal classification by the government). Similarly Ashoka University is also one of notable Private and Autonomous university, "autonomus" university status is another elite institute classification by the government of India.
Please feel free to remove the rows you think are not notable if they are not part of elite organisations. Please retain the formatting and additional information I have added, i.e. table, additional columns for information on the existing notable entries, see also section, etc. I have left the similar message on the article talk page click here to preempt/address potential similar concerns from other editors in the future. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 07:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for the information. I greatly appreciate your structural improvements and cleanup of the list format, but "notability" on Wikipedia has a specific meaning (see also WP:GNG). I will answer in more detail on the list's talkpage to avoid fragmenting the discussion. GermanJoe (talk) 08:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks GermanJoe. See you on article talk page. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sport in Haryana concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sport in Haryana, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sport in Haryana[edit]

Hello, 222.164.212.168. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sport in Haryana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari[edit]

Hello, 222.164.212.168. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "All India Institute of Medical Sciences".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:222.164.212.168&oldid=1199002408"