User talk:212.187.244.65

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions to European Australians and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 00:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 12:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Best known for IP per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Best known for IP. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TheSandDoctor Talk 00:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.187.244.65 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was accused of sockpuppetry by an IP which is very likely a sockpuppet itself, of User:Taking Out The Trash. Their grounds for their bad faith accusation were "Per their reverting of others edits as "grammatical nonsense" and just general abusive edit summaries". None of my edit summaries have been in any way abusive; I described an edit as "ungrammatical nonsense", not "grammatical nonsense" because the latter is itself clearly nonsensical; and the edit I described as ungrammatical nonsense was, indeed, ungrammatical nonsense. It would be truly extraordinary and extremely concerning if removing nonsensical text from an encyclopaedia was seen as undesirable. And yet, a sockpuppet IP managed to fool an administrator and get me blocked for improving Wikipedia, and they put the nonsense text back into the article. If you block people who remove nonsense from articles, and encourage people who add it, just what do you think will happen to your "encyclopaedia"? 212.187.244.65 (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 212.187.244.65 (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't a denial. The ends do not justify the means. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Yeeno. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft evasion without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yeeno (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeeno: It's a WP:BKFIP probably. I've reported him. AXONOV (talk) 19:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 12:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2023[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 09:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.