User talk:173.17.94.228

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

August 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay, thanks. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 11:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 17:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at False Hare. Waxworker (talk) 13:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Same disruptive editing resumed following block for same behavior/edits. Magitroopa (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 04:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell am I doing that is disruptive editing?! I don't see the any actions of mine like that! I think I'm trying to make your pages more better and understandable! Now I don't even know if I should do it again since you keep rejecting them and blocking me. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 1. date changes again, resumed off block Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must be very angry at me now enough where you just want to block me when I make just one little disruptive edit. I REALLY REALLY don't mean to do it, please unblock me, I won't even bother edit unless if I really have to, even when unblocked, I'll just look at your pages normally. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, these were all accidents and a bi misunderstanding! 173.17.94.228 (talk) 23:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you answer my messages?! I aplogized and it was an accident! Please unblock me! 173.17.94.228 (talk) 23:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Adventures of Tintin (film), you may be blocked from editing. resumed off block Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'm sorry. Thanks for the reminder. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 16:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed when you left me my messages after my 3 edits I did yesterday, you warned me that I might get blocked but then you blocked me anyway that's kinda too harsh. I'm freakin sorry, it was an accident. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you said I'd get blocked if I continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, but you blocked me anyway, is that because you just got so angry enough you had to do it. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 17:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me! If I did any harm it was by ACCIDENT!!! 173.17.94.228 (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geraldo Perez, just wanted to say I'm very sorry for my edits you found disruptive. I'm also sorry about my messages I've sent for you to unblock me that you found harsh to reply back. Will you please unblock me, and if I edit something (one you never told me was wrong in the past ever), leave me a message and I'll reply back and tell you a good reason why I edited that one. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you a message yesterday, have you seen it yet? 173.17.94.228 (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me mercy? 173.17.94.228 (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got blocked for no reason![edit]

Hi, 4 months ago, I got blocked, but for no reason. I hate it when that happens. Will you please unblock me? I still promise not to do disruptive editing. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 12:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel bad and I'm sorry[edit]

Geraldo Perez, just wanted to say I'm very sorry for my edits you found disruptive. I'm also sorry about my messages I've sent for you to unblock me that you found harsh to reply back. Will you please unblock me, and if I edit something (one you never told me was wrong in the past ever), leave me a message and I'll reply back and tell you a good reason why I edited that one. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.17.94.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was because of the films School of Rock and Monsters vs. Aliens as associated productions to Nickelodeon Movies and Television series/films being as acquired to the company and was wanting to put that in the Nickelodeon Movies template in a pleasant and unconfusing way173.17.94.228 (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock (updated)[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.17.94.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as I did at The Adventures of Tintin (film) 173.17.94.228 (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand WP:CITE and WP:RS. You've previously promised to stop and then broken your word. It seems that you either don't understand or are unable to control yourself. Either way, the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.17.94.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The times I've done distributive editing was not to be mean or careless in a bad way, is that I thought of some ideas to put in and edit since I thought they were similar to the main things we are talking about. At the same time, I was nervous because I was trying really hard to do it the right way so that I won't get blocked. I'm so sorry for the negative/failed times, I feel bad right now. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whilst I do not feel that you are being deliberately disruptive, this request does not convince me that you understand why you have been blocked, and therefore I do not feel that you will make positive conttibutions in future. — Voice of Clam (talk) 12:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.17.94.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really will make positive conttibutions in the future, to do that, I'd probably will have to just explorer here mainly and not edit UNLESS IF I REALLY HAVE TO! Please, I feel like a block from wikipedia isn't supposed to be good and is like a punishment. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 13:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you aren't going to edit, there is no need to remove the block, since blocks only prevent editing. You should request unblock when you have an edit that you want to make. We need to see some evidence that you will make a constructive contribution in order to unblock you- the block is not a punishment, but a means of preventing disruption, so we need to be convinced that there will be no more disruption. One way of doing that is to know what edit or edits you want to make. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.17.94.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm worried that if wait this long to get unblocked, than I'll be doing the same disruptive editing I've done before. You see I learn my lesson on what I did wrong a lot more sooner than you think, it's not like I'm 100% dumb, it's just I have to realize my bad editing tow wikipedia and learn not to do it again. Could you consider my thoughts about this? 173.17.94.228 (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm worried that if wait this long to get unblocked, than I'll be doing the same disruptive editing I've done before. If you don't make a productive unblock, you're going to lose access to this talk page. I suggest you take some time and put some actual effort into it, or edit elsewhere in the mean time. Star Mississippi 01:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.17.94.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I meant to say, was just "You see I learned my lesson on what I did wrong a lot more sooner than you think, it's not like I'm 100% dumb, it's just I have to realize my bad editing to wikipedia and learn not to do it again. Could you consider my thoughts about this?", I'm sorry my other sentence from the beginning sounded threatening to you, those were not my attentions. 173.17.94.228 (talk) 22:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You clearly have no intention of taking on the advice given to you below, either through WP:CIR or deliberate trolling. Talk page access revoked for the remainder of your block. — Voice of Clam (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are in grave danger of having your block substantially extended. I very strongly suggest you take down your open unblock request. If you wish to be unblocked sooner, edit another project. Build up a substantial history of problem-free non-trivial edits, then (but only then) come back and ask for an unblock here. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it to another admin to review your latest request, but my thoughts are as follows: Firstly, veiled threats that "if I'm not unblocked now, I'll just be disruptive when my block final expires" are not going to help you in the slightest, and will only deter a reviewing admin from unblocking you. Secondly you have shown no indication that you understand why you were blocked in the first place. I strongly suggest you delete your badly-worded request above and spend some time putting together a coherent request that proves clearly that you understand why you have been blocked, what sort of edits you wish to make in future, and most importantly how you will avoid a repetition of the problems that got you blocked in the first place. Also pay attention to the suggestion Yamla made above. Good luck! — Voice of Clam (talk) 07:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin, please consider revoking talk page access and/or extending the block. This is going nowhere. --Yamla (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

— Voice of Clam (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

(WHOIS ^{(alt • old)}
Geolocate ^(Alternate)
Proxy Checker
Current blocks
XTools
Global contributions)
(RIRs: Africa
America
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Latin America/Caribbean)