User talk:Viclifecute

Speedy deletion nomination of Victor Oscar Company[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Victor Oscar Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Captain Raju,

The page should not be deleted because it provides important information about the company Viclifecute (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Captain Raju,

I apologize for my ignorance as this was my first article and I didn’t read the rules and regulations of posting articles.

Please give me a chance to improve this article by adding citations from credible sources, remove all content that violates the rules and regulations and also add important information.

Thanks in anticipation Viclifecute (talk) 11:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my actions and I appeal to be unblocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viclifecute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand my purpose here and I will henceforth contribute to building an encyclopedia Viclifecute (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us what was wrong with your edits, what you will do differently in the future, and what constructive edits you will make(such as what articles or topic areas you will edit). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi 331dot,

The problem with my edits were that they had no citations from any sources and they were not important nor necessary edits.

Henceforth, I will only make important edits with citations from credible sources and they will be in business articles and topic areas Viclifecute (talk) 11:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with the Victor Oscar Company?--Bbb23 (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No relationship. I am an independent blogger and I am targeting big companies without enough online presence. I plan to post about them so I can grow my blog Viclifecute (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you just grabbed the pictures in the article from the company's website? And it's just happenstance that your username starts with Vic, you create an article about a company whose name starts with Victor, and all the disruptive edits you made were to Victor articles? And even if what you say is true, Wikipedia is not a platform to promote your blog, directly or indirectly.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbb23,

I’ve had my account for over 2 years and I didn’t break any rules. This was unintentional. The name “Victor” is a name that naturally inspires me because it depicts “winner”. So I’m a fan of everyone or everything with the name in it. That was why I started all my edits with everything that had Victor in it. I really should have read the rules and regulations and I sincerely apologize for not doing so.

I had over 10 articles to create about big companies I knew didn’t have enough online presence so I could grow my blog but I decided to start with the company that had “Victor” in it because of my love for the name.

I didn’t know what I did was unambiguous advertising and If you give me the chance, I promise to edit the article with credible citations and remove all content in it that breaks the rules.

I also promise to be very careful and abide by all Wikipedia rules. And I will not promote my blog on Wikipedia directly or indirectly.

Please give me one last chance. I won’t break the rules again

Thanks in anticipation Viclifecute (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I still donate even while blocked? Viclifecute (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, you don't even have to be an editor, blocked or not, to donate. Like most places, Wikipedia is happy to take money...from anyone. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Viclifecute (talk) 06:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]