User talk:United Blasters

Welcome!

Hello, United Blasters, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rahio 1234 10:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bro United Blasters (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Star Maa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 19:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem? Check other Star channels's Wikipedia there is a section for Sister Channels, because it doesn't have separate Wikipedia. What source you need here? These channels are available in India. Please learn about Disney Star channels United Blasters (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Star Suvarna, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SLK

if got jersey news add to clubs, some not easy to pick correct pattern. 93.138.223.133 (talk) 11:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will try to do that. United Blasters (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

United Blasters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have any connection with the mentioned account, the only similarity is that I also edited football contents, is it a proof for being sock? Please recheck this, this is a misunderstanding occurred to you. Please unblock me United Blasters (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are various clues to me that suggest this is not a matter of merely being in the same topic area. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2024 unblock request 2

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

United Blasters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Blocking administrator: Daniel Case (talk)

Reviewing administrator: I'm not seeing particularly strong evidence of sockpuppetry from comparing the edit history immediately prior to the block, can you clarify if there's something I'm missing? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request reason:

It's not comedy, take it seriously, Please reinvestigate the sock, this account is not a sock. I agree that, I found some similarities with mentioned account. I uploaded Logos of FOOTBALL Clubs, because I trying to better Kerala Football articles with good faith. Please reconsider it. Last, I confirm that there is no actual connection with mentioned account, only some similarly in editing topic. Any other admins here?

Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=It's not comedy, take it seriously, Please reinvestigate the sock, this account is not a sock. I agree that, I found some similarities with mentioned account. I uploaded Logos of FOOTBALL Clubs, because I trying to better Kerala Football articles with good faith. Please reconsider it. Last, I confirm that there is no actual connection with mentioned account, only some similarly in editing topic. Any other admins here?|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=It's not comedy, take it seriously, Please reinvestigate the sock, this account is not a sock. I agree that, I found some similarities with mentioned account. I uploaded Logos of FOOTBALL Clubs, because I trying to better Kerala Football articles with good faith. Please reconsider it. Last, I confirm that there is no actual connection with mentioned account, only some similarly in editing topic. Any other admins here?|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}

Checkuser data is not particularly useful here except to point out that this user is editing from the same general area of the world as previous socks. Note, though, this is probably what you'd expect, given the specific subject area they edit. --Yamla (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can check my Good faith edits, for improving Kerala Football Wikipedia articles. the location is coincidentally occurred. And that the similarity in editing topics. There is no connection with mentioned user/account. Take it seriously and take action faster as possible. United Blasters (talk) 10:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Daniel Case, in case you missed this earlier. -- asilvering (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. This, I recall, is one of a bevy of accounts that @Cenderabird: and I identified a few months ago as socks of Bobanfasil, who concentrated on Indian soccer articles. 331dot seems to agree that this was a valid call. Perhaps we should ask for a Checkuser? I would also like for Cenderabird to share here what they think are the relevant diffs, especially given the user's explanations/protestations above. Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla's earlier comment said that CU data wasn't very useful in this case, though that was two months ago. -- asilvering (talk) 16:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what account they were checking against, though (and they don't have to say, at least not publicly). Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]