User talk:Status/2012/11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter[edit]

The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009), Sturmvogel 66 (2010) and Hurricanehink (2011). Our final standings were as follows:

  1. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2. Canada Sasata (submissions)
  3. Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions)
  4. Scotland Casliber (submissions)
  5. New York City Muboshgu (submissions)
  6. Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions)
  7. Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions)
  8. Michigan Dana Boomer (submissions)

Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 00:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)[edit]

In This Issue



Picture[edit]

Hey, I just saw this picture of Jen at the premiere of What to Expect..., you should crop it and upload it for her filmography page, because it's her at a film premiere. Idk..just a thought:) It's like the only pic from recently that isn't from her tour. Arre 02:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Can you please put the tour pics here in the Dance Again Tour category? Zac (talk · contribs) 02:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Um i don't know how to do that, sorry:( I'm trying to work on Dance Again World Tour btw. What do u think of the concert synopsis? Arre 02:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just change the category on the pics from Jennifer Lopez to Dance Again World Tour. Duh. xD Awesome, ofc. Zac (talk · contribs) 02:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All of them individually? Arre 02:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Zac (talk · contribs) 02:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I did most of them under an IP. But i was blocked from doing more because of spam. Arre 02:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you change your name back? :O Arre 02:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Because I couldn't get access to commons under Zac. I only have the name Zac on en.wiki, while I have the SUL for Status. Statυs (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see; welcome back Status!! Arre 03:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, thank you! Good to be back! Jennifer Lopez - Can you say, flawless? Statυs (talk) 03:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FLAW to tha L-ESS! So good to see something other than Dance Again Tour images or...you know...the MTV pic...Lol Arre 03:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Might be hard re-naming again to what it was before re-naming again :P Enjoy. — ΛΧΣ21 03:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why again? :D — Tomíca(T2ME) 12:43, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Status! Do you think School District 53 Okanagan Similkameen would be a good candidate for featured list status, as right now I'm afraid it doesn't pass 3b of the featured list criteria. This is the only article for this, and it can't be merged into anything, however, I personally believe it passes, but am not sure of what others think. Do you think it does? Thoughts? Thanks so much, TBrandley 03:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how it could be merged into anything else, so I'd say go for it! Statυs (talk) 03:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I also asked NapHit, so first I'll see what he thinks, then nominate it. Cheers! TBrandley 03:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Opportunity: Low to High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Opportunity: High Cachito de Cielo   Opportunity: Medium Bo Bice
Opportunity: High The Real Thing (2 Unlimited song)   Opportunity: Low Reb'l Fleur
Opportunity: High You Belong to Me (The Doobie Brothers song)   Opportunity: Medium Eve discography
Opportunity: High Just a Lil Bit   Merge
Opportunity: High An American Idol Christmas   Opportunity: High New Zealand Music Awards
Opportunity: High Feel the Noise   Opportunity: High Activision Publishing Minneapolis, Inc.
Opportunity: High Jennifer Paige (album)   Opportunity: Low Comparison of instant runoff voting to other voting systems
Opportunity: High Happy (Ashanti song)   Add sources
Opportunity: High Christina Aguilera doll   Opportunity: Medium Hot Boys
Opportunity: High 2012 MTV Europe Music Awards   Opportunity: High The Kinleys
Opportunity: Low Eros (Eros Ramazzotti album)   Opportunity: Medium R. Kelly
Opportunity: Low Life (Simply Red album)   Wikify
Opportunity: Medium Chantilly (fragrance)   Opportunity: Medium Basement Jaxx discography
Opportunity: High American Idol (video game)   Opportunity: High Laney Stewart
Opportunity: High The Itch (Vitamin C song)   Opportunity: Medium Stylus (magazine)
Opportunity: Medium Stefano Farina   Expand
Opportunity: High Second Chances (TV series)   Opportunity: Medium World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria
Opportunity: High Now That's What I Call Music! 8 (U.S. series)   Opportunity: Medium Q'Viva! The Chosen
Opportunity: High American Idol Magazine   Opportunity: Low Back to Black

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lotus[edit]

Why did you replace the image I uploaded, twice, when there was nothing wrong with the one I had uploaded. You wouldn't even explain it in either of your edit summaries. Do you have an issue with me, or the things I upload? livelikemusic my talk page! 23:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you have a problem with me... I uploaded a less sharp version and you reverted. Statυs (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Because you didn't even explain the change. If you had explained why, I wouldn't have reverted. Seemed to me that you were just doing it because of me, since I didn't see any issue with the quality of the one I uploaded. It was crisp and clear. That's all I wanted to know, thanks. livelikemusic my talk page! 19:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012[edit]

Please comment on Talk:IPhone 5[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:IPhone 5. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was bored and I started it and added stuff...do you think I've gone overboard with it? Lol Arre 07:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not! It's great! Amazing job! Statυs (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I didn't know that there were so many great sources to use. What do u think of the pic? Should u upload another 1? Or is it okay? Arre 12:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The screencap? Statυs (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No that's fine, I mean the pain pic of the fragrance? Arre 12:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's good. I would prefer if each of the same sites or used, and I like Still one better, so could you upload Glow from the same source? Statυs (talk) 13:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay, cool :). Yea, that's true. I'll see if they have one for Glow. Any other perfumes u want me to work on for her? It was actually kinda fun working on Still, because it is my fave JLo perfume! Arre 13:57, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You know how many she has. xD Pick one. Preferably in order. Obviously all the flankers will stay in one article, like how Glow is. Statυs (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love to the Live and do its flankers on its page, like how Glow is done. Not that into Deseo. By the way there was a pic of Glow on the site but it's dark even though it's good quality. Arre 14:07, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, not a very good pic. Let's just worry about the pics of the perfumes later, when all the articles are up. Live sounds great to do next! It's next in order, too, if I'm correct (she has so many I lose track). I can do Deseo! Statυs (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yea. By the way, Estée Lauder are idiots! did you know that? I never knew that they rejected making Glow. Yea u can do Deseo. Then we can move onto Love & Glamour. Glowing is such a loner I wonder if she will make a flanker called Shining or sth Lol. Arre 14:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not being rude, just telling the truth. Again ignoring valid comments/concerns isn't helping and this could have probably been finished and promoted with no further problems a long time ago but of course the WP:IDHT-attitude has to interfere and ruin it. What a shame! Till 13:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Again, the only comments I ignored were yours, and you know damn well why. Give me a break. As usual, you're in here with your rude behavior. I don't fail or refuse to get any point. "In some cases, editors have perpetuated disputes by sticking to an allegation or viewpoint long after the consensus of the community has decided that moving on to other topics would be more productive." This is an FLC. Everybody has different views of what should be done. Statυs (talk) 13:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I actually don't know why but whatever. Btw, I actually went on wikibreak cause this irritated me, but now I'm actually quite pleased to see it, as it shows that I've had some impact on your life that you would do that for me. :) And again, why haven't my issues been addressed? Till 13:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • I literally said above it, please re-read. Oh, you retired because I was keeping track of you? I thought it was because you realized how far you were on to attacking me, so you had to stop so you weren't blocked. It's funny to me that you'd still think I'd resolve any issues you point out, after all of this. I wish you'd just leave me alone, I'd like to do the same. If you have a problem with someone you leave them be. Statυs (talk) 13:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Impact, though? Is that the best you could think of? Statυs (talk) 13:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
            • It's true. What other reason would someone follow somebody's else contributions on a regular basis and keep track of it? Because you want to take note of my incivility and have me blocked? Yay! Good job! How about a round of applause for that. Till 13:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Honestly you really do have the maturity of an eight year old. "I wish you'd just leave me alone" - hypocrite. You insist on me leaving you alone and yet all you do is file ANI reports on me, keep track of my edit summaries, stalk my contributions, comment on things that I comment on, and just constantly follow everything that I do here. Such a massive hypocrite. If you ever wonder why so many other editors have had problems with you here, then take a look in the mirror. As the saying goes - don't dish it out if you can't take it. In simple terms; if you want me to leave you alone, then don't keep track of my edit summaries and plan ANI reports about me. Kthanksbai. Till 13:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I filed one ANI report against you, and that is indeed true. How has Swifty had a problem with me? He's a friend of mine, and I still talk to him daily following his indef block. It's late there, and I have to go to school soon, but within the next 5 days, which I have off, I wish to speak with you (not on here). Good move at moving to my talk, by the way. Statυs (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • But seriously, it you left me alone I wouldn't have to do anything. Mostly every 'track' is a response to me from you. Statυs (talk) 13:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • My laptop that has GTalk on it is officially broken. There's no form other form of communication other than WP. Till 14:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Surely you can download it. Or I'm sure your email works. This isn't something either of should be broadcasting. For what it's worth, I'm sorry this has gone so far and it jut needs to stop. You and I have been really good friends. Statυs (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unapologetic[edit]

Oh I didn't know that, thanks for sharing that! Regards, Decodet (talk) 15:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the iTunes store, right? Because I couldn't find a "composer field" on it, only in my iTunes library but since the album hasn't been released yet I don't have it on it. Decodet (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, on the iTunes Store. You have to right click on the sections that show "name", etc and checkmark "composer". Statυs (talk) 16:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Phillips' Home[edit]

If you are unaware of American Idol tradition, the winner digital single is for the always released the day after the finale night. This one happens to be included in the album, but it is the single. The new one is exactly the same recording, the only difference with the new one is that it has a new picture. It doesn't mean the single was released in June, it only means that that one with new picture was released that day. Hzh (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am fully aware of "Idol tradition", thank you very much. I'm just going by the sources. It was released as a single (which is a song released APART from an album) on that date. Simple. Statυs (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note that on iTunes itself it said the single was released on May 23, 2012 - Phillip Phillips. This is the same article as the one on Allmusic. Also Billboard said it is the single in an article written in May 30, 2012 here, before the June date. Hzh (talk) 01:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All those dates show to be correct to its first release on the album, again, not as a single. Evidence doesn't show it's SINGLE release, which is what the article is about, until June 7th. Statυs (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Must you be so difficult?[edit]

It's quite clear that I don't want those unproductive comments on your talk page. Why are you being so deliberately counterproductive by reverting me? Till 09:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't wish to talk to me, why must you? I'm entitled to keep any comments I like on my talk page, it's my talk page, not yours. I don't know what I've done to you between now and a few days ago when you seemed fine to have a nice heart to heart with me. Statυs (talk) 09:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nice heart, what on earth are you on about? I called you a hypocrite and a child. Till 09:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re-read please. Statυs (talk) 09:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
??? There wasn't one. Till 09:55, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I expressed my interest, didn't I? And now I ask you what has happened since then, as you seemed fine with that. Statυs (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Expressed your interest in what? You wanted to talk to me, I said I can't, you said you were sorry, and I ignored you. Still don't see anything. Till 10:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so you don't care? Then why are you still pestering me? Statυs (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can't pretend that I don't exist and I can't ignore your forever because we have too much history, I mean we spent day-by-day talking to each other for goodness sake. However what is possible is to remove those nonsense comments above that I was trying to get rid of and this thread too and just start fresh again for the benefit of both of us. As you can see I'm already trying to rebuild frienships with someone else and I really don't want to waste any more time on this project with fights about the most silly, superficial things that have absolutely no value at all (sometimes even about nothing, literally <see above>) so I am asking you to remove these stupid comments and for both of us to walk away from this dead horse and be on good terms. Thankyou. Till 10:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not the one still picking fights with you, I expressed wanting to start afresh with you, and according to yourself, you "ignored [me]". Statυs (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    That was 4 days ago. This is today. Till 10:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    And we haven't spoken since. I asked what had happened. Statυs (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing happened omg i'm just trying to stop having fights about stupid things. Till 10:26, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    OMG and now we're having a fight about having fights about stupid things. Statυs (talk) 10:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    In my defense though, you said leave me alone and five minutes later said sorry... so if I ignored you at that time it was proabably because I was confused but I guess it has taken me 4 days to reach a settlement. Till 10:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand. My "settlement" was reached within a five minute period, but I understand. Statυs (talk) 10:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay I removed the nasty comments at the Colourblind Afd, now can you please remove (or at least archive) this thread and the thread above that I attempted to remove. And can you delete the tracking of my edit summaries please. Then all this can be put behind us. Till 10:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cup of tea[edit]

Till 10:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Till 23:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for making Wikipedia a better place. :P — ΛΧΣ21 04:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

I know you'd love this, so here you go. — ΛΧΣ21 04:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And please, take care of the babies while I am out. — ΛΧΣ21 12:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hypnotico[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2012[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Dick Grayson[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dick Grayson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jennifer Lopez Collection[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Marc Anthony Collection[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Hey[edit]

Whatsup man? Been a while. I was wondering if you could take a few minutes and do a review at the The Emancipation of Mimi FAC? I'm struggling to get activity to I'm trying to round up any of my old peeps that are still active!--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 08:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been quite a while! I'm pretty good, how have you been? I would, but I know that I'm not experienced enough for such a high level as FAC; sorry. I'm sure you'll get some comments too. I have been meaning to ask you, would you like to work on "Theme from Mahogany (Do You Know Where You're Going To)" together? Both mine and your girl have recorded a cover of the song. It's really the only song article left that needs expansion for (my eventual) plan to get On the 6 to become a good topic. Let me know. I don't have time at the moment, but down the road aways. Statυs (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Been good man, tryina get back into the swing of things :) It seems like an interesting idea, but there's some issues maybe you can help out on. 1). Do either of us know shit about Diana Ross lol? That's the main part of the article. 2). Do you think we'll find sufficient information to write appropriate sections each of our favs? Lemme know what you think ;)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 03:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't. xD But that never stopped me from working on things before. I did the "Jai Ho" article without knowing much about AR, haha. I don't think there would be for JLO, but Mariah released her version as a promo single, so maybe. Statυs (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, sounds like a convincing argument :) Let me think it over and get some head-way with the FAC and I'll let you know :D--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 21:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drinks for You (Ladies Anthem)[edit]

what do you think of the song? Arre 12:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't heard it yet. Statυs (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I will leave a critic commentary here. The song has a very good beat and sound, but the lyrics are not living up to standard [mostly Pitbull's part]. The vocal performance of Lopez is astonishing in my opinion, very sexy and stylish. Althoguh, some repetitiveness damage what could have been an amazing song. It has potential as a hit, but it won't follow the success of "On the Floor" or "Give Me Everything". — ΛΧΣ21 16:09, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's an OK song! Of course, Pitbull has to go and ruin everything he touches as usual. Although, that's sort of a lie, because "On the Floor" and "Give Me Everything" are both amazing songs. I would have liked it better if it wasn't so alcoholic-like. One moment, we are just drinking on the weekend to relax after a long week, and then we just decide to drink every single day of the week! Statυs (talk) 01:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only here for J.Lo's part. But atleast I can stand Pitbull's part. I like the song it's so different to other generic crap. But it will definitely not be a hit. Don't think it will be a single. Great description, "astonishing" "sexy and stylish" ~true. Arre 01:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help.[edit]

Hello. A new picture on Demi Lovato's wikipedia page is needed, therefore I legally bought a recent picture of her from getty images and took the full permission to use it on Demi's wiki page. You can find the full info on the last section of Demi's talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Demi_Lovato#New_legal_picture_to_be_added — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.185.189.101 (talk) 19:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and comment on RFC[edit]

Would you take a little time and give your opinion here? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Statυs (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Still Jennifer Lopez[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Nice work on the J.Lo songs page:) By the way, I made a sandbox for her new song w/ Pitbull. Obviously I'm not gonna publish it or anything, but just in case it becomes a single or anything like that, I made it. If you find anything please add it. Arre 05:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to the Rihanna page on 8 October 2012.[edit]

www.rihanna.com is not the official website, www.rihannanow.com is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apeman2001 (talkcontribs) 07:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Lopez songs template[edit]

Hey it's just a suggestion, but could you consider linking her videography and discography pages to it? I often find when I'm looking through her song articles it would help. Arre 08:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has nothing to do with songs though. Statυs (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In response to your message to me earlier, WP:TVPLOT suggests that, in a short summary outside of the episode article itself (if there is one or not, doesn't matter), it should be from "100–200 words for each, with upwards of 350 words for complex storylines", it doesn't really matter if there is an episode article or not. If it has an actual episode article, then it should be more words says that same guideline, but in this case, it should be "100–200 words for each, with upwards of 350 words for complex storylines", as already said. "The plot summary is an overview of the episode's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes and technical detail" says that guideline if it helps, and don't hide spoilers per WP:SPOILERS (just in case it is). In your list, most seem good, but some are too long, such as episode 22 summary. I'd be inclined to give a peer review, and I thank you for modelling it of off my list. I have made minor changes, as you probably know. Cheers, TBrandley 21:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I'm not familiar with WP:TVPLOT, thanks for pointing that out for me. I'm not too familiar with TV articles, but I wanted to give it a go for one of my favorite shows. The first two episode summaries were rewritten, do those seem like a good length and dept? Yeah, episode 22... haha. You're most welcome, and thank you so much for using that date tool! OMG! I haven't heard of it before, so I got it working for me, and it's so damn helpful! Statυs (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the first, even five, look very good, and your welcome. Yeah, I love working with television articles, and lately other ones as well. And about the script, no problem, and that's not the only useful script. There's also a dash, overlinking, general formatting, advisor script, and more, see User:TBrandley/vector.js for my other good scripts. They're very good. Back to the list, I will be providing a peer review here shortly. Cheers, TBrandley 21:57, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aww, thank you very much! I'll take a look at what else I can steal, haha. Statυs (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As always, no problem! Your now my QuiFriend! TBrandley 22:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I literally just saw that. You're now mine as well! Statυs (talk) 22:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my quick review, I took at look at everything other than episode plot summaries. Looks pretty good overall:

  • The featured list criteria is against the use of non-free use rationale images. Any other replacement images?
  • Avoid periods in image captions that aren't full sentences
  • I would say there is too much plot details in the lede, and too little other information, such as production, reception information and such
  • Also, first paragraph should be split into two, as it is a really bigger paragraph
  • Could writers and directors be referenced?
  • Reference problems; "TV Line" should be "TVLine"; "TVbytheNumbers" should be "TV by the Numbers"
  • How is "Contactmusic" a high-quality reliable source?

TBrandley 04:18, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Tomíca(T2ME) 23:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Opportunity: Low to High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Opportunity: High Carter's, Inc.   Opportunity: High Eric Forrester
Opportunity: High Anaconda (film)   Opportunity: Low Every Breath You Take
Opportunity: High Bom Bom   Opportunity: Medium Stephanie Forrester (The Bold and the Beautiful)
Opportunity: High Tag Team (group)   Merge
Opportunity: High Mike Del Rio   Opportunity: High Spread (typography)
Opportunity: High Grace Jones (supercentenarian)   Opportunity: Low Gaza War
Opportunity: High Dockers   Opportunity: Low Young Money (group)
Opportunity: High Ben West (musician)   Add sources
Opportunity: High Too Many Fish in the Sea   Opportunity: Low Recovery (Eminem album)
Opportunity: High Krazy (song)   Opportunity: High DanceLife
Opportunity: High Looks Like Sex   Opportunity: Medium Va Va Voom
Opportunity: High Azul (Cristian Castro album)   Wikify
Opportunity: High No Sleep (Wiz Khalifa song)   Opportunity: High Jack de Keyzer
Opportunity: High James Warwick (The Bold and the Beautiful)   Opportunity: Medium Giorgi Dolidze
Opportunity: High Jamie King   Opportunity: Medium Moskau Messe
Opportunity: High Ice Cream Paint Job   Expand
Opportunity: High Six60   Opportunity: Medium Give Me Everything (Pitbull song)
Opportunity: High Rachel Snow   Opportunity: Low Billy Gilman
Opportunity: Low The House (album)   Opportunity: Low Texas discography

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing reliable sources and referenced content[edit]

I have only noticed your edits twice recently and twice you have removed perfectly valid content and sources. Here you removed a huge chunk of content from - Home (Phillip Phillips song), claiming that it is unsourced when in fact some of those deleted content are in fact sourced, the content in the Critical reception was sourced to here. It looks like you never even look at the source before deleting it. If the reference wasn't done properly, then there is the citation need tag and other tags you can use. Here in Taylor Swift discography you revert sales number from perfectly valid sources, without giving proper rationale why that is not acceptable and that another outdated one would be preferable. Roughstock is a perfectly valid source, it is not less reliable than Billboard, they get their numbers from the same source which is SoundScan. Please try to engage in editing in a more positive manner. Hzh (talk) 01:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I removed unsourced content from "Home", and Roughstock is certainly not as reliable as Billboard is. Statυs (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The source of the numbers are the same - SoundScan, there is no such thing as "not as reliable" when their sources are the same. As I said, most of the content in Critical Reception for Home were actually sourced, if poorly done (they are not inline citation, but instead of deleting them, you should have used other tags instead). Hzh (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A Blogspot blog could get their information from SoundScan, does that make it reliable for usage? They weren't sourced at all. Some people have different ways to deal with unsourced content, I, personally, just remove it. I have updated the sales for Red from a link from MTV. Statυs (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Roughstock is not just a blog. It is a magazine site for country music news, it existed before there were blogs. I have no idea what you mean by unsourced, these sites have to pay money to get those numbers, they can't invent them, and the numbers always tally with others (like Yahoo Music, Billboard, MTV) when it is possible to check and compare, meaning they are legitimate numbers. Hzh (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct. I've checked around about the website, and it seems quite reliable. I will not make that mistake again. Unsourced meaning that the content is there, without a source to where it is coming from. Thank you for your comments. Statυs (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Do you think, If I work on it more, Taylor's article is worthy of a GA nomination?? I'm not going to or anything, I just want your opinion Arre 04:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh by the way I started this sandbox, I know I jumped the gun a bit but if you find anything please add it up :D Are you awake? Arre 09:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A bit? :P Well, it's good to be prepared, I guess. Statυs (talk) 14:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is haha. Arre 01:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bye the way you know how you fixed the dates on Dayzee Leigh? Could you do the same thing for Sharon Newman? Arre 01:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on. Fixing GAN issues for Feelin' So Good right now. Statυs (talk) 01:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In My City[edit]

Hello User status, can I ask you to add the above article to your watchlist? I'm really getting tired of all these deletions without discussions and POV pushing. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Statυs (talk) 14:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever you're ready ;)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 01:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

is Template:Did you know nominations/Don't Stop the Party (Pitbull song) okay?? Arre 09:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry I keep hassling you, but could you please upload a music sample for this article I just created (Brand New Me (song))? Arre 11:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits in violation of mosdate[edit]

A number of your edits, including [1] [2] [3], are in violation of mosdate, and WP:DATERET in particular. Also, by simply undoing, you removed other fixes I did in some of those edits. This constitutes notice that if you continue to change the established style of articles, you may be WP:BLOCKed without further warning. Gimmetoo (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've read those pages up and down, and don't see what you could possibly be talking about. Note that your reason for reverting me consisted of "undo", "." and "back"... Very good explanation. Statυs (talk) 14:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And if you're referring to the fact that I'm switching how the references are formatted on several articles I ACTUALLY CREATED (if you're talking about the major contributor thing, in which I AM in all the articles I changed). Statυs (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:DATERET. These articles evolved with a predominant style. Arbitrarily changing styles like that disregards the effort and time spent by numerous other editors, especially the main articles that have existed for years. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously... I wasn't going around changing every format for every article in existence. I was changing the format of articles that I am the main contributor of. I get that you probably see this a lot (probably explains your lack of effort in explaining things), but you really need to assume some good faith, and not throw around "you may be blocked". Statυs (talk) 21:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to intrude, but I would just to comment that most of these articles (Jennifer Lopez discography, No Me Ames, etc) weren't compiled from years of hard work from numerous other editors. Status created some of them and substantially expanded most of them. Additionally, I have encouraged and even asked him to format dates this way per MOSNUM. It's just easier and more manageable. Arre 22:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Personal (album)[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012[edit]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Look Mickey/archive1[edit]

As the WP:GA reviewer, I thought you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Look Mickey/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sending Condolences 2 You[edit]

Hope you feel better soon..
Hey Zach, so sorry to here about your loss :( I hope you feel better soon... Take is easy, much Love, Arre 02:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much Arre! It means a lot! Statυs (talk) 03:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Abbey Road Sessions (Kylie Minogue album). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Scream & Shout[edit]

Thank you! And definitely, the more views the page gets and the more Scream & Shout is promoted, the better. :)

Issue[edit]

There was a big issue with my internet provider... and i have no internet until i dont know when.... :( — ΛΧΣ21 05:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absence[edit]

Sorry for your loss. Hope you're ok mate. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 22:50, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hash. It's been hard; but I'm hanging in there. Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's ok man! I've been there. Can I ask is it family or a friend? — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 22:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was my aunt; dad's sister. Statυs (talk) 22:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your reverts[edit]

Hi,why you reverted all my edit.Those edits were sourced but had nothing to do with song....like this in commercial performance video views were included.other include which was directly copy pasted in background section....tell me her singing in karan what had yo do with background if in my city.(Pks1142 (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I explained why in my edit summary. Statυs (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Magic hands[edit]

Do not forget to use them here ;) ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 01:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Scream & Shout[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2012[edit]

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive[edit]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rihanna Diamonds World Tour.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rihanna Diamonds World Tour.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:In My City[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:In My City. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2908 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Hello[edit]

Check your PM's please. Arre 13:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]