User talk:RupertNY245

Welcome!

Hello, RupertNY245, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to WXTV-DT. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:RupertNY245 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 00:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't insulted you or anything. Now you're just being spiteful. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1 week? They're going to come back and make more attacks like they did today. I'd indef ban them and their other account. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't even said anything lmao. She's the one being spiteful. She's the one who made up a lie to me. You called my thing "irrelevant." You were the one being insulting. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What attacks did I make today. I simply said I didn't appreciate her lies about me. That's all. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you guys don't make it easy to talk to management and tell my side of the story. Because you guys are spiteful. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "management" and no one is being spiteful or making up lies to you.

Please file an unblock request if you believe there is an issue or you risk losing access to edit your talkpage. Star Mississippi 23:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You lied and said I was a troll. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said you were trolling, which you continue to do. I'm not sure who you claim said your stuff was irrelevant.

Please file an unblock or you will lose access. Star Mississippi 23:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And how do I do that? And where can I go to complain about what you and him did to me? RupertNY245 (talk) 23:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There must be a more higher up here who can I complain to. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there are no higher ups, {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} is how you request an unblock. Mentioning a court of law will just get your block extended. So either file it, or stop the nonsense. Star Mississippi 00:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See you're being rude to me. How does mentioning it get me a block extention? RupertNY245 (talk) 00:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a rule against this? RupertNY245 (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need an unblock. You've already made up your mind. I'll wait out your ban... RupertNY245 (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I will write a big fat review about this site and it won't be nice. This is the type of arbitrary stuff I gotta deal with. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not. Now I really wanna find someone to complain to because I have to deal with this arbitrary judgment by mods on this type of thing. You just said something that wasn't true. I reacted to him only because he did that.

Your friend is the one who said that

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WXTV-DT&action=history

He clearly calls my edit irrelevant. In a mean way RupertNY245 (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's pretty spiteful.

I DID LEAVE A MESSAGE BEFORE THIS WHOLE THING STARTED. Give me some time to find it. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said from the very first day I was here, I am the same person because I wasn't breaking any rules at all. Then your friend says my stuff is "irrelevant," in a very mean way. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is decentralized so I risk arbitrary abuse from people like you and him. I wish there was someone who can protect me from this type of mistreatment. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah how do I do that, and again although I am having trouble I did post this issue before the fiasco started. I know this arbitary judgment benefits you at my expense, because I have a hard time finding it. Because there's no central mod I can talk to that supercedes your authority here, but you know I'm stuck here. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You said "irrelevant" in a very mean and attacking way yourself. You're the one who began this whole thing. I didn't break any rules. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make any personal attacks today. And I certainly didn't talk to you. You might wanna recheck your idea of a personal attack. It may not fly in a court of law. RupertNY245 (talk) 23:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I have been mistreated by certain people here. As you can this whole fiasco started when Mvcg66b3r called my edits irrelevant in a mean way, and then Star Mississippi (or whatever he name is) proceeded to make lies about me}} RupertNY245 (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RupertNY245 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been mistreated by certain people here. As you can this whole fiasco started when Mvcg66b3r called my edits irrelevant in a mean way, and then Star Mississippi (or whatever he name is) proceeded to make lies about me RupertNY245 (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have provided no reason here to think that your behavior will change, in fact, you have doubled down. You're lucky that the block was not made indefinite. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Saying you don't appreciate someone's arrogance and that they should have you reported is not abuse. I can show my displeasure. I didn't break any rules. That's the only "infraction" of the rules I did. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)}} {{unblock|reason=Also the only reason I got blocked today was because I confronted Star Mississippi, who has been rude to me, and deserves to be banned herself. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:18, 11 July 2024[reply]

Please do not use "no wiki" when posting your unblock requests. Simply what begins and ends with the brackets. You can simply edit one request rather than opening multiple. Star Mississippi 00:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will be writing a big fat review about this website. Thank you for being so rude to me. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And how the heck do I edit this. I can't. I'm banned remember? RupertNY245 (talk) 00:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have access to the talk page, which you have been editing. You can edit the unblock requests the same way. Star Mississippi 00:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a simple mistake. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rupert, I converted your second unblock request into a comment. You may have only one unblock request at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Bbb23, I did not break any rules, and all I did was simply voice displeasure of her insulting me like that. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus her little friend called my edits "irrelevant," as if to suggest WWOR was not as popular, or whatever. Plus Mississippi said nonsense. If you can't unblock me can you at least talk to her about this. Because I feel like I don't get protection from arbitrary types like her. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She has been completely disrespectful to me, and antagonistic. I merely voiced displeasure. I've had issues with this account, which is why I felt I had to make another. I never got banned, merely had issues with logging in. And she spread a lie about me. And was belittling me. She even said "nonsense" just to be rude. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Some advice: I blocked you for personal attacks. Making more of them while you're blocked is not going to help you. If you persist, you risk being blocked indefinitely. And don't argue with me about it. You're the only one who thinks your behavior is acceptable.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What personal attacks? RupertNY245 (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I simply voiced displeasure. RupertNY245 (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We know you are perfectly aware, but just in case, here's a brief reminder:

"People here are dumb..." – Special:Diff/1200148097/1233247891
"...this is starting to smell like stupidity." – Special:Diff/1233396885/1233397075
"Are you one of those idiots..., "I swear idiocy in rampant on some of these sites." – Special:Diff/1233392261/1233393484

Your return would be surprising at this point, but this should clear up any confusion on your part. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Your talk page access has been revoked for the duration of your block. If you resume disruptive editing when block expires, the next block is likely to be much longer. Please see WP:UTRS for your unblock options. Cullen328 (talk) 01:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Cinemax, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 18:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to WPIX appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to have one done for Tim Malloy by somebody. Unfortunately the last time I tried to make an article, it wasn't approve. RupertNY245 (talk) 21:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You guys have some stringent crtieria for sources too I must add. RupertNY245 (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Feeglgeef. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cinemax without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Feeglgeef (talk) 23:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Feeglgeef. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cinemax without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Feeglgeef (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not add information unless it is backed up by a reliable source. I have also reverted your edit because you are adding trivial information that is not pertinent to the article, such as "An interesting thing is that a portion of the old cuplights did somehow remained in select parts of the City as late as 2001. The Fort Washington community, a community for Vets which is just south of the Bridge, had those cuplights before being replaced by the Westinghouses in around 2001. The same was true about the Gowanus Expressway, at the interchange for the Belt Parkway - the ramp to stay on the BQE, West, used to have cuplights as the underpass lighting, until they were replaced in 2002 by the NEMA heads, which had lit up the rest of the highway's underpass." Epicgenius (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cinemax, you may be blocked from editing. Feeglgeef (talk) 00:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Preview – Consolidate – Summarize

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
- The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 00:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Q ^{T C} 01:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]