Jump to content

User talk:Red Director/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Welcome!

Hello, Red Director/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Martin Porcheron 16:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Help

Hello, Red Director, How can I change my present username? Thanks. --SmileyBrown (talk) (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Red Director!

I am recently new, however, I am trying to learn as much as I can about editing and following the guidelines. I am looking to add the name of a Mountaineer and Poet named Mekael Shane, who attended Central State University, but I have no idea of how to add his name to the Central State University article. When I Googled Central State University Notable Alumni, I see that Mekael Shane is listed there. When I Googled Mekael Shane, everything I read about him online, states that he "attended Central State University." I have no idea about how to write an article on Mekael Shane, but if I have to so that he is not deleted from the Central State University article, I'll gladly do so. What I'm curious about, is if there are smaller article styles whereupon an article about a subject can be written, like perhaps a smaller, more brief bio article or something similar? Is it possible if you could either create one on Mekael Shane, so I can see how it's done, or if you could guide me through the process? Either way, I'd appreciate your input and help.

Warmly, Balthasar.Wassermann (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. Red Director (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Red

How long have you been doing this :)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:A:3:0:0:0:8A (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Since 2006 with a long break from then to today. Red Director (talk) 19:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Canadohta Lake

I just wanted to reach out to you about 11 months ago you edited Canadohta Lake, I wanted to reach you if possible to allow the community's history be shared, by my representation of small rural communities that their history is not recognized. I just want to ask if you could assist with any links to other wiki pages? If not I would consider the following, "History that is not shared shall stay in the dark forever, bring it into the light and let the story of origin be shared." Consider my words carefully, help me with any pages that I edit with historical data and information that is accurate, I want to surround myself with experts in making links to other wiki pages. Largo96 (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. Red Director (talk) 17:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Help

Hello again, Red Director!

Because I am new to Wikipedia, I appreciate your continued help. Thank you for your suggestion that I have my biography reviewed by a good biography editor. How do I find such an editor? Or do they automatically look for contributions in every new member's Sandbox? If so, how often do they look?

As you know, I have finished editing my first biography, which is now waiting in my Sandbox. Please let me know if I have to move it to another page so that a good editor can review it and hopefully approve it for publication.

Sincerely, Michael H. L. Hecker. Michael H. L. Hecker (talk) 18:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page Red Director (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for including me!

Hi! I'd just like to thank you for including all my hard work on the Volume and Booster Series pages by including them in your Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game sets Template. It took a while, and it's nice that someone appreciates all that hard work! I'm adding the templates to them right now to those pages, so you don't have to worry about that.

Kalajin 05:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

--Extra Addition

Sorry for editing your template, but I just wanted to save some time while I was thinking about it. It was just a minor addition.

Kalajin 05:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Richard Bull (musician)

The article Richard Bull (musician) has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. See WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki 19:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Note regarding reverts

This is a friendly note regarding reverting vandalism. This revert of yours to South America reverted to the last version by an IP which had previously vandalised the page and which had also changed statistics without explaining why in an edit summary, nor citing any reliable sources for such a change. Please make sure that you are reverting to a good version by checking the "history" of a page. Cheers and happy editing! Jpeob 03:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

No worries. It's easy to do. Checking the history is a good habit to get into, however. By the way, feel free to respond to talk messages where the conversation starts. I'll watch! Cheers, Jpeob 03:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you beating me to a few reverts while I was using VandalProof. You don't seem to be using any tools, so I thought I'd give you some. VP is good, but Lupin's anti-vandal tool is excellent. Since you're working with us, we might as well make you more effective and efficient, eh? Oh, and here's a gift for you too.

Have a good day, and leave me a note if you have any questions! Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 05:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia

I think they should remain the same so people can immediately go to Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia to see the description of the cards. I have an account on Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia too. The Legendary Ranger 15:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better.Darry2385 04:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Diphenhydramine edit

Why was my edit in the "recreational use" segment on diphenhydramine reverted? It is extremely common for the drug to be taken up to 900mg and some daring individuals have taken well over that. It is also common knowledge in the diphenhydramine abuser underground that full hallucinations and interactions usually start after ingesting about 550mg.

Duelist Packs

No, but as they have not yet been released in English yet, I'll stick to the Japanese name until they name it in English. Drake Clawfang 06:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Revert

No problem. CheersPeter Rehse 04:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Crandall Addington

Hi, just a note to let you know I changed this article to a redirect to Crandell Addington. Best as I can determine, the latter spelling is correct, although it is spelled inconsistently all over wikipedia and the rest of the web (e.g. Hendon Mob). —Kymacpherson 18:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


Concerning the Causes of WWII

Thanks for looking out for vandalism; it was my mistake for not marking the changes as discussed.


Walrus

Hi Red Director, I assume you're trying to stop vandalism with your reverts at the Walrus page - seems like people like to vandalize it. However, take a look at the comments on the article discussion page I made (under etymology, IP address 192.168.2.102). There you'll see that my changes reflect the OED etymology, as well as the etymology to be found at http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=walrus. Do you have any info supporting the old etymology ("shore-giant")? If I don't hear back from you I'll just revert it again. Rosenkreutzer 07:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Got your message Red, I'll do that in future. I'm new to this.Rosenkreutzer 10:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

VirginiaBoy

Hi, Red Director, I hope it's okay to put this on your page but I have a question about The Fairly OddParents episodes list; on the far right column it has the term "code" and three digit numbers below it. What do these mean, are they the order in which they were produced or something else entirely. I hope it was all right to put this on your talk page, but if it isn't let me know! Thanks

Carz

No problem, There has been a rash of vandalism on fake animated films jj 20:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Rochester, Minnesota

Hello. I undid your reversion to this article [1] as the data table appears to be a useful edit, rather than vandalism. Let me know on the article's talk page if you disagree. Thanks. Kablammo 17:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt response. I see the contributor is adding similar tables to other articles, so if there is a reason why it shouldn't be done the editor should be notified. Regards, Kablammo 17:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Maria Sharapova (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


P:RUS

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alex Bakharev (talk • contribs) 23:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC).

Portal History vandalism

It is amazing how much of the vandalism here seems so infantile, thanks for your revert - I really wonder whether there is a need for some form of proetection SatuSuro 04:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Revert

Thanks for my user talk revert. :) --Teck(with no h)WizTalk Contribs@ 22:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I just wanted to say thanks for reverting vandalism to Suzanne Middle School. -A.Ou 19:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Feral child. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kyra~(talk) 20:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Warning retracted. It can happen to all of us (happens to me occasionally), so don't worry about it. And sorry about jumping the gun on my part, as well. Keep up the good hunting, and have a great day. Kyra~(talk) 20:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

re:Pokemon articles

Well, thanks, heheh. o.o—ウルタプ 02:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

zune

You recently did a rv on several edits on Zune. The rv was large and you marked them as minor and you did not then start any comment on the discussion page. You may want to read Help:Reverting which states, in part, "If you feel the edit is unsatisfactory, improve it rather than simply reverting or deleting it." and then laster, "Do not revert changes simply because someone makes an edit you consider problematic, biased, or inaccurate. Improve the edit, rather than reverting it." You may also want to read Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith. 70.17.92.51 21:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Mountain rescue, individual mountain rescue teams articles?

I volunteer in a local mountain rescue organization, Rocky Mountain Rescue Group in the "real world." Our group has around 70 volunteers, and in numbers of emergency operations we are most likely the busiest volunteer mountain rescue team in the US (60 operations/ year). We are also one of the oldest volunteer mountain rescue teams in the US (founded in 1947). Some of our members have suggested that we should write an article for wikipedia on our team. I see that a one organization has already done this Holme Valley Mountain Rescue Team. What do you think? Is a Wikipedia article on Rocky Mountain Rescue appropriate?DriveBy27 02:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

RV Irish Famine

You can have == Emigration == or ==Emigration== works out the same. Half the titles on this page have a space, your just making edits for yourself, there was no call for revert. Culnacréann 09:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Next King of Games

With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Next King of Games: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Navou banter 03:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

SpongeBob episodes

Please see Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes#(SpongeBob SquarePants episode) Vs (SpongeBob SquarePants). Thanks. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page :-) - ∅ (∅), 18:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Yu-Gi-Oh! Expansions

Hi R.D., I explained the reasoning for the format on my talk page in greater detail if you want to check. In short, it was to make the articles more encylopedic, comprehensive and organized, rather than just list every card in a set (which includes the infobox, release dates, mechanics explanations, etc.) The only reason that there is inconsistency between the formats is the fact that I haven't gotten around to introducing the new format to all the expansion pages, though I was intending to (I mentioned this on the Force of Breaker discussion page when someone else questioned the formatting a while ago; I was working backwards from Tactical Evolution, and got as far as Power of the Duelist the last time I found time for it). Anyways, I'll leave the pages as they are for now, but I do think the newer format is more precise as an encylopedia article (vs. a mere list, which can be looked up elsewhere). Drop a reply on my talk page. Ciao. --Benten 23:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit: Just thought I'd mention this. Since the previous versions of the pages that you reverted to are incomplete in terms of info and have some sp/grammar errors from before which I fixed while working on them, I'm going to change it back now (it doesn't really do much harm given that they've had the new format for quite a while already). If you want to continue discussing the matter, leave a message on my talk page. Cya. --Benten 13:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Got your message. I'm fine with there being a "+/-" range for sets in terms of notable card number, but I think there still has to be a reasonable maximum, as to prevent other editors from going all out and listing any number of cards. For the cards to be notable, I think there has to be a valid reason for them to be in the section, but aside from that, I'm in agreement for changing the format of all the articles to match the newer one. Ciao. --Benten 23:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Lagoon Amusement Park

Hi! You made an RV to Lagoon Amusement Park that looked like it was accidental, after I'd reverted some vandalism; just wanting to check that there aren't more crossed wires and that the page in it's current state is OK :) njan 00:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

ClassicStruggle8 (talk · contribs)

I'm a little confused as to why you welcomed this user, considering they were blocked as sockpuppet, and the talk page was clearly marked as such. Natalie 00:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Right on. I kind of thought so, but figured I'd ask anyway. Natalie 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

how do i

how can i keep the 16 Droenz article? they've been featured in a newspaper on Guam but that article was never published on the website, which kinda frustrates me.{helpme}11:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Alienbabyboy 11:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

If you have the date of the newspaper you can still use it as a references, just type
The Daily Mail June 22 2005

Or whichever newspaper and date it is. You need some more credible 3rd party sources though, rather than just official band stuff. Hope that helps!

how's about this?

Pacific Daily News (local newspaper) December 17, 2006?


but it's not on the website at all though... would that be fine? Alienbabyboy 11:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Family Business (Yu-Gi-Oh! GX)

Please read the talk page. Matty-chan 00:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)



How Do I...

 I'm not sure how to talk to other users.{helpme}

Tiffanyjager 01:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

thank you for the welcome

Thank you for the welcome even though I've been around for a month. I usually don't write anything because it's better to be silent than to write something dumb. I'm getting the hang of how to do things, like signing your name and other stuff. SNPBrown 22:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jaden Yuki Starter Deck, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Username

I don't know. Can you point me to whatever comment you're referring to? NawlinWiki 18:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

JaJuan Smith

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article JaJuan Smith, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. -- WebHamster 03:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Poker Player Notability

The WP:POKER is discussing what we believe constitutes notability for poker players. We have a proposal on our talk page, if you'd like to chime in, please do so here.Balloonman (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon

An article that you have been involved in editing, Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 22:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Duelist Pack - Jaden Yuki 3

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Duelist Pack - Jaden Yuki 3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Revival of the Great Dragon Structure Deck

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Revival of the Great Dragon Structure Deck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Forbidden Legacy

An editor has nominated Forbidden Legacy, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbidden Legacy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jaden Yuki Starter Deck

An editor has nominated Jaden Yuki Starter Deck, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaden Yuki Starter Deck and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Comeback soon

I just notice that you quit, hope you comeback someday, Thank you for all that you did do. ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 00:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Landsford and Laura Ingalls

The key part of "merge and redirect" is merge, if it's necessary; you redirected this page to an article that didn't even mention their names, let alone any information on who the heck they were. Propaniac (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Sidney Lane Burchill

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sidney Lane Burchill, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sidney Lane Burchill is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sidney Lane Burchill, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Harry Potter aur Aag Ka Pyala

I have nominated Harry Potter aur Aag Ka Pyala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 02:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Bloch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Bloch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bloch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 08:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Red Director. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Appreciate it

Thanks for your work in doing all those minor cleanups. God knows our NFL pages are littered with poor wording and grammatical errors that often go unchecked for years. Looks like you were a fairly prolific editor at one point. What made you decide to pick Wikipedia back up after nearly a decade? Lizard (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words. I used to love doing this a long time ago. I was part of various communities and got to know a good group of users. I just stopped for a while after some minor things here and there. I have had some free time over the holidays this year and have really enjoyed picking things back up. I was a constant lurker editing under IP addresses for a while in my hiatus. When I saw something, I would just fix it. I wanted to create an article a little ways back but could not under my IP so I just thought it was time to bring back the old account. Red Director (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Well, I hope to see many more of your contributions in the future. Lizard (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm just amazed how you find this stuff so quick. Sometimes i'll go 20 minutes or so between checking my watchlist and i'll come back and see your name 8 to 10 times with these fixes and that's just the articles on my watchlist. I think to myself, how the hell does he find these so quick? Excellent work Red Director.--Yankees10 19:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeh, same here. He's like a glorified bot. Lizard (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Yankees10 and Lizard. I find this to be a healthy activity to do in some of my spare time. Red Director (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Reddirector2.0

Do you have any connection to User:Reddirector2.0? I suspect it's a sockpuppet posing as a legitimate user. Lizard (talk) 00:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

No, I do not have any connection to that account. That is actually kind of unsettling. Red Director (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
I've brought it up with an administrator. I have a pretty good idea of who it is, an IP hopper who's been stealthily creating havoc for a few months now. Most of their edits appear legitimate at first glance, and some of them actually are legitimate. It's becoming a pain. Lizard (talk) 02:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Well, thank you for bringing with up with a higher up. I wish those with the abilities to be productive on here would actually do so. Red Director (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Langston Hughes

Hi! I probably should have dropped you a note here rather than reverting your edit, since I did not not know what the actual phrase should express. I think the phrase should be from the mid-50s to the mid-60s. The rise of the Black Power movement beginning in the mid-60s and the associated cultural changes fits as the end of the "Hughes' popularity among the younger generation of black writers varied..." period. I'm going to make that change now, and put a citation needed tag until I have a chance to find a reference. Perhaps you can find a better phrase. I appreciate your thanks message. — Neonorange (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. I thought how the layout was presented required just a quick minor edit not intended to change the structure of the sentence. I appreciate you providing some information here. Red Director (talk) 19:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
I think it's how we are wired—one detail catches our attention and masks others. I find myself automatically assuming a sentence, paragraph, or section makes sense; that only a detail needs tweaking. But the nature of Wikipedia, with hundreds of editors with this same approach, is that articles slowly drift from coherence. Eventually, minor rewrites should be considered—the Hughes Career and Political views sections, perhaps.
Good to have the chance to talk with you. — Neonorange (Phil) 19:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Given your long period of inactivity, your name still appears at WP:MW. Remove it? 103.6.159.92 (talk) 10:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Sure. Thank you for letting me know. Red Director (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

In the city the population was spread out

Are you adding these commas to communities in all states? If not, please start — it's going to be confusing for future bot-runs if a huge number of communities have the comma and a huge number don't. Nyttend (talk) 04:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


Will do. Red Director (talk) 06:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the response, and thanks very much for the edits. It's quite important for all the Rambot-created demographics sections to be of uniform style, simply because other people have done mass wording updates in the past and we can expect other mass wording updates to be done in the future — someone who's doing a wording update ought not to encounter slightly different formats in different articles. You're basically guaranteed to encounter these sections in articles about places that were municipalities or CDPs in the 2000 census; Rambot generated these sections from Census Bureau data for all municipalities and CDPs in 2002, and it's quite rare for someone to have added them manually to any articles that were created at other times. Therefore, your typical non-CDP unincorporated community won't have them, and probably the most common scenario for when they'd appear in an unincorporated non-CDP is when a 2000 census CDP was de-designated for the 2010 census (e.g. Mack North, Ohio or Midway, Washington County, Tennessee) or when a municipality has disincorporated (e.g. New Rome, Ohio or Columbia, Virginia), although a municipality that disincorporated before 2010 sometimes had CDP status (e.g. Alvordton, Ohio) for the 2010 census. Nyttend (talk) 23:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Fondo Interbancario di Tutela dei Depositi

Calabre is not a misspelling. It came from Calabria. Matthew_hk tc 03:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. The AWB flagged it and it was an automatic change. I will stay on the look out. Red Director (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For your excellent edits. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordarrelle Patterson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Dooley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adrian Peterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sunday Night Football
Champ Bailey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sunday Night Football

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian Randolph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Dooley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marwin González, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and Politics

Dear Red Director,

We are a team of social scientists conducting research on collaboration among Wikipedians and would love your input. We have prepared a very short survey (it takes just a few seconds to a few minutes) that asks about your political preferences and if you had any experiences collaborating with editors with similar or different preferences. Please fill it out here:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSftvvCdGGY07VL1R1O4JhwnOTHl8CyiFnn17gC6EeWgJj-2Bg/viewform?usp=pp_url&entry.587409359=Red_Director

You can find out more about our research project here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics

Thank you for your time and help!

Bill10000 (talk)

Proper

Hi I need your help , someone keep edit a Wikipedia page without use a proper information Tim.1944.Au (talk) 08:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

I will respond on your talk page. Red Director (talk) 12:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Muhammad Aziz listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Muhammad Aziz. Since you had some involvement with the Muhammad Aziz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Tony Gonzalez edits

Hey there! I want to personally thank for relinking all of the references to Tony Gonzalez with the unnecessarily added "(American football)". I appreciate it.

Thanks! Potatornado (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Don't forget to add the – with the scores, you removed it on some of the articles like this. Thanks WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Jamal Agnew

Hi, just letting you know that I did not revert the latest disruption on this article (around 15 min ago), but I did put in a request for page protection for sock the puppetry and block evasion. Have a good day, Dawnseeker2000 22:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Red Director.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Red Director. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Red Director.
AfC submissions
Random submission
~6 weeks
1,264 pending submissions
Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephanie Johnson (Survivor constestant)

A tag has been placed on Stephanie Johnson (Survivor constestant) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phillip Fulmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2004 Peach Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

See also's

In your edit at Brett Hundley, you added see-also links at the top of each of his college subsections even though there were already links to the same seasons in prose. Per MOS:SEEALSO, see-alsos should not duplicate links that are already in prose. Please be careful to check the prose first before adding a see-also. Perhaps consider incorporating the season links into the prose in lieu of a bunch of see-also's mechanically added to begin each section? Thanks in advance.—Bagumba (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Will do. Red Director (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (The 2010 United States Poker Championship) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The 2010 United States Poker Championship, Red Director!

Wikipedia editor Semmendinger just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job creating all these redirects! You might already be aware of it, but you'd be a great user to apply for Wikipedia:Autopatrolled user rights. Let me know if you have any questions!

To reply, leave a comment on Semmendinger's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SEMMENDINGER (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Direction

hi Thanks for being with me and believing in me, I am going through hard time but I have felt your present more than ever please help me to be on the right path and guide me to make a right decision.and give me patience and support my family and wrath so I can take care my family

Thank you for your welcome

Thank you for such a warm welcome :) --Prashant1788 (talk) 06:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks very much for the welcome message.--Andrew Feliks (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC) and AFeliks I have a lot of materials about my inventions, but I'm already 68 years old and disease https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myasthenia_gravis which makes my work very difficult .. But I think that I can publish a lot, how will health be .God bless.

Hi, just adding on to here instead of creating a new section. --Pinkythank (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Thank you for welcoming me with virtual cookies. I'll keep on making small edits and no longer be scared of participating!

Thank you!

Thanks very much for the welcome message. FSVFA (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for the welcome message. RLO1729 (talk) 19:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi Red Director and thank you for the message, your tips and encouragement. I am fascinated by Wikipedia, I mean the collective achievement and high quality it represents, and I appreciate your advice to be more compliant with rules necessary for the sustainability of this project.

I hope I can better contribute, although I am lacking time and maybe discipline (I am French, you know) for that. I am spending hours every week on Wikipedia ! Learning so much and having fun for free - I make donations at each request. This collective knowledge project gives me hope for the future of mankind.

Thanks again and continue your good job.

Lecanard (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!

You seem to be very dilligent in handing out welcomes. How nice! I've put a little thank you thingy in and amongst all the other ones so it has some friends

Mʌk (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for the welcome message. I've had two of my classes do WikiEDU assignments, which have worked well. I've appreciated the support of WikiEDU staff. You might be interested in the page my class worked on this in fall 2018: Intellectual property education. Jahurst (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Red Director and thank you for your comments. I have read WP:IUP, and WP:UPIMAGE. My question is about using public photos from Interlanguage links (links from a page in one Wikipedia language to an equivalent page in another language). If I provide interlingual links and use the exact same photos (including format, content, and copyright issues) is there any reason to prevent publishing these photos on the English language version of the page? Do I need to put photos into the Wikimedia Commons, if not there already? In some instances, the JPG file naming language is not the same ... what do you suggest? Thanks, Zvrk9 (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. Red Director (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Thanks for message

You took down some of my amendments , citing the reason being it appeared nonconstructive. That is fine I just seek to find out which parts were of this nature so I can not make the same mistakes in future. Many Thanks

I do not recall. Can you show me one page that you modified so I can look at it? Red Director (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Visual editing

I´ve usually edited with the visual editor on the swedish page. However I can´t seem to reach it on the english version. Could you help me with that?

Laboz125 (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Laboz125

Answer on your talk page Red Director (talk) 20:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Cannot login to old account

hello. and thank you for your welcome message on my talk page. i used to edit before a lot many years ago under the name Dungbeetle, but when i tried to login to start editing again, it says, no email is associated with the account. so it will not allow a password reset as such. i did nt find anything to address that on the help pages, so i had to start a new account from scratch. but i would nt mind having those old edits added to my new account or vice versa. but because i do not want to give out my email, perhaps i forfeit the right to the aforementioned privilege, which is fine too. Dungbeetle2 (talk) 06:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. Red Director (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Response section

Thanks for your comments and suggestions! I appreciate you taking the time, and especially your gentle nudge toward the accepted wikipedia etiquette vis a vis filling in forms, etc., which is not always intuitive for new(er) people such as myself. I'll take your comments under advisement! newmila (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, Red Director. I hope to continue adding to the fund of knowledge re: 19th century botanists, where needed. The one I've been working on (Edwin James - scientist) was in much need of revision. Nearly finished now. It has been a Wikipedia learning experience which will help in any future endeavors. I've done a fair amount of essaying in HTML, but this is a whole new ballgame.

Thanks again, Lblakely (talk) 17:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome and the tips. I am happy to come back to the offer to ask questions on occasion. For some years I have been gaining some experience with Wikipedia work, but getting help is always good. Felari (talk)Felari 17:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome and your willingness to help us newer users, Red Director! I appreciate your tips!

Hi Red, here's the problem I'm having over and over: I only edit 1-2 times a year, and the signature process is arcane at best. The four-tilde signature process doesn't apply to the preview, so I get confused every single time (six months apart or so). I will try to auto-sign now.... 73mmmm (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--Summerintx (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Census comma changes.

That was an interesting fix you added to the census paragraphs of various articles, to add a comma. It would be nice if all those boilerplate paragraphs could be rewritten to remove stuff like the population being "spread out," which makes no sense at all. Anyway, it is nice that you are keeping an eye on the details. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Photo licensing

Thank you Red Director for your offer to help me as a newcomer! I'm having difficulty properly dealing with licensing for photos to post, and have gotten some messages about problems, and notifications of photos being removed in a week if I don't fix the problems. I'm unclear what to do. Is there a way for you to see these messages and advise me how to deal with them?--Dr.bobbs (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page Red Director (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Justifying left and right on the same line

In using other pages about radio stations as a model, I notice that the first line on published pages starts with From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (justified left) and the coordinates (Coordinates: 29° 57' 17" N 98° 05' 39" W in our case) justified right. How would I do that? Thank you! --Summerintx (talk) 22:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page Red Director (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the kind words on my talk page :)

Zarthus (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

How do I flag inappropriate content for more experienced reviewers?

Thanks for the welcome! I do have a question - as I'm a new editor, I'm wondering how to flag inappropriate pages. I came across one that I felt someone experienced needed to look at but I can't seem to find a 'hey look at this one' type of flag.

Thanks! EchoSound (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page Red Director (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for your kind words and helpful suggestions! Dirkp5826 (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for note. Looking for information to learn macros.

Thanks for your message, Red Director. Yes, I've been contributing here and there since 2004, mostly on Wiktionary. Looks like somebody downgraded me in January. I don't have time to make large contributions, but try to do a little where I can. I find the macros (has hammer) confusing and would like to find a tutorial on them. Cheers, RS van Keuren Rsvk (talk) 00:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Response on your talk page Red Director (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Orlicz-Pettis Theorem

There is a stub with this title. I produced a full entry for this stub. Everything is fine, with one exception: The crucial line that follows does not print and the reference to Pettis article does not show. What should I do? Below those three lines I copy my full entry from the Sandbox. The missing line is in the source just before the sentence starting Also Dunford... Math45-oxford (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Pettis directly referred to Orlicz's theorem in Banach's book. Needing the result in order to show the coincidence of the weak and strong measures, he provided a proof. [1].

Answered on your talk page Red Director (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ B.J. Pettis, On integration in vector spaces,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1938), 277–304.


  • Alexiewicz, Andrzej (1969). Analiza Funkcjonalna. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa..
  • Albiac, Fernando; Kalton, Nigel (2016). Topics in Banach space theory, 2nd ed. Springer. ISBN 9783319315553..


Category:Theorems in functional analysis

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Red_Director/Archive_1&oldid=1138927297"