User talk:Raghunadh singh

February 2022[edit]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] MrOllie (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randomization trails and supply management (February 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gpkp were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randomization trails and supply management and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Randomization trails and supply management, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raghunadh singh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 10:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Randomization trails and supply management[edit]

Hello, Raghunadh singh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Randomization trails and supply management, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Randomization trails and supply management[edit]

Hello, Raghunadh singh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Randomization trails and supply management".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raghunadh singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my account blocked by Wikipedia for making changes in the "Electronic data capture " page added the relevant commercial product which is available in the market, The edit I made is useful for the people who are looking for commercial electronic data capture software for clinical trials. I added the relevant information, please again review my account and unblock the account what changes I have made are irrelevant or spammy I will never do such edit again

Decline reason:

As you see nothing wrong with your spamming, there are no grounds to lift the block. Yamla (talk) 10:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock requests[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raghunadh singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block that was imposed on my Wikipedia account for adding spam links. I acknowledge and deeply regret my mistake, and I would like to express my sincere apologies for any disruption or inconvenience caused to the Wikipedia community.

I understand that spamming is a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I assure you that it was an unintentional error on my part. I value the integrity and collaborative nature of Wikipedia, and I am committed to abiding by its rules and contributing constructively to the platform.

Since the block was imposed, I have taken the time to thoroughly educate myself on Wikipedia's guidelines, policies, and best practices. I have gained a comprehensive understanding of the standards expected from contributors and the importance of maintaining a reliable and spam-free platform. I am dedicated to ensuring that such mistakes do not occur in the future.

I am willing to accept any necessary corrective measures to rectify my past actions and to prevent similar incidents from happening again. I am open to receiving guidance, mentorship, or any form of supervision to ensure that my future contributions adhere to Wikipedia's high standards. I am also committed to actively engaging in discussions, collaborating with other editors, and seeking consensus on any disputed content.

I genuinely believe that I can be a valuable and responsible contributor to Wikipedia, and I am eager to resume my contributions to the community. I am passionate about clinical trials software and would like to contribute my knowledge and expertise to help improve the quality of articles in those areas.

I kindly request you to reconsider the indefinite block on my account and grant me another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I assure you that I have learned from my mistake and will adhere to the highest standards of conduct moving forward.

Thank you for considering my appeal. I appreciate your time and attention to this matter. I am eagerly looking forward to your favorable response. Raghunadh singh (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining this as it was clearly written with an AI. We want to hear from you, not an AI. 331dot (talk) 10:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you use AI to generate that unblock request? PhilKnight (talk) 16:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]