Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Hello! Pirhayati,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are and we thank you for it! Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. In fact, I know these regulations and I have more than 14000 edits in Persian Wikipedia. The problem is that most of the sources about this person are in Persian. So, a person who knows Persian, should consider his notability. Anyway, I request userfication. --Ali Pirhayati (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'll shortly post the deleted text here The problem wasn't that the references were in Persian, it's that the article didn't explain why he is notable.
We have a one paragraph spammy start — who says he is prominent?
We have an OR list of his supposed views, without a single in-line reference to support it
We have a list of his book, which for all I know have sold one copy each
You are an experienced editor, so you know the importance of in-line citations, especially in biographies of living people, and especially when you are claiming to know his views. He may well be notable, but the article as it stood didn't tell us why and didn't properly reference the claimed text. Jimfbleak - talk to me?06:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, obviously much better with the refs. I tidied a bit, including removing "distinguished", which looks spammy, otherwise mainly MoS, link to Heidegger etc.
Two of your "views" appear to have inadvertently rolled into one. I've separated them, but that leaves the third bullet point unreffed. Obviously you will need to fix that.
I think there is still some doubt about whether he meets WP:Notability (academics). He appears to be an academic doing what academics do, and writing a few books. Obviously I'm handicapped by not being able to read Persian.
Once you have added the missing "views" ref, I'd suggest that you move it into article space. It won't be eligible for speedy deletion since it has refs and isn't spammy. It's possible that it might be tagged for notability, but there's only one way to find out!
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §FreeRangeFrog22:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. More sources are needed to show notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 09:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Changizi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rensselaer, See and Feel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Formal sociology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Integration, Inequality and Approach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Tooley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Causation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto Pöggeler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Foulquié until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FiddleFaddle10:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Being in the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Big Bang Theory (season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topless (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a translation of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.
Hello, علی پیرحیاتی. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rahnama, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rahnama to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali Rahnema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Giles (philosopher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to James Giles (philosopher) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Fathali M. Moghaddam, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://explore.georgetown.edu/news/?ID=1961, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Fathali M. Moghaddam with a link to where we can find that note.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Carl Raschke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20130531061043/http://carlraschke.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Carl Raschke has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, علی پیرحیاتی. As you know, some copyright issues were flagged recently with some of your contributions. Unfortunately, on closer evaluation, it seems that you may have had a previously undiscovered habit of copying content from your sources. It seems obvious to me that you were working on good faith, as you have cited every source that I've yet found, but unfortunately this is simply not something we can do on Wikipedia. It is very unusual for a source to be free for copying in that way.
I have had to remove content from several articles you created and have listed your contributions for a "contributor copyright investigation" (CCI) so that they can be evaluated against our copyright policies. The intention of a CCI is simply to address outstanding copyright issues. You can help by reviewing the articles yourself and proactively removing or rewriting any copied content that you find. The listing is here: Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20140301. If you address a copyright issue in any article, please feel free to make a note beneath the listing. Something like this would work:
:Problem addressed. --~~~~
The article will still need to be reviewed by somebody else, but it will both help reviewers and demonstrate your improved understanding of our copyright policies. To that end, I would recommend reading Wikipedia:Copy-paste as well as the policies and guidelines to which it links.
I've just noticed that on March 19, you created the article Moral intellectualism by copying substantial content from the article Intellectualism. While it is permissible to copy content from one article to another, content on Wikipedia is not public domain and the terms of the license must be met. Unless you meet these terms, this copying is as much a copyright problem as copying content from sites that are not compatibly licensed.
The way to meet the licensing term on Wikipedia is to give credit for the copying at minimum in edit summary and often also on the talk page. This is a required step. I have provided the attribution at Moral intellectualism to resolve the copyright problem there. If you wish to move content from one page to another, or from one project to another, in future, please be sure to follow those necessary steps. You can read more about how to do them and why at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl(talk)10:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Stone (blog) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosalyn Diprose, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Embodiment and Phenomenology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common cold drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Achard of St. Victor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard McGinn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad Ilkhani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAMT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Affect (philosophy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Carruthers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969TT me03:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NewMutants (talk) 08:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Letting die, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blythwood (talk) 18:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philosophy Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyed Mohsen Fatemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. :)Ladsgroupoverleg02:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pirhayati. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, just to let you know I've put a proposed deletion template on Diego Bubbio's page, which I note you created. I reason that the deletion of the page for Dimitris Vardoulakis implies that his Bubbio is also NN. esperant05:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time spent reading, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Age. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Your recent editing history at Opposition to copyright shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Pirhayati, thanks for creating Nancy Kendrick!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide more sources and expand the article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Pirhayati, thanks for creating Critical Horizons!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. for the moment the sources provided only prove the journal's existence but not its notability as per WP:JOURNALCRIT. More sources need to be added to prove that it meets one of the criteria or WP:GNG.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello, Pirhayati. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, William N. Dunn, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hello PirHayati, given the nature of your edits, would you please have a look at the article "Nader El-Bizri" in case your viewpoints contribute to the discussions and the improvement of the article. Thanks a lot (2A02:C7D:36C6:8300:D12:62B3:A5A8:95F0 (talk) 22:59, 12 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time spent reading until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalenciaᐐT₳LKᐬ12:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Pirhayati. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please update and expand the page, if possible, to make it more encyclopedic. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Pirhayati: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Pirhayati. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John Palmer (psychologist), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kb.au (talk) 02:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Six issues published over 10 years, not indexed anywhere (let alone in selective indexes), no independent sources, according to journal's own homepage a grand total of 229 subscribers. Utterly non-notable publication, does not meet WP:NJournals (insofar one wants to consider this an "academic journal") nor WP:GNG (or any other possibly applicable notability guideline).
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Bombardier Challenger 604 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof?14:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mina Başaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof?19:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hüseyin Başaran (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Velkley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Taylor-Foster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Pirhayati, thanks for creating Cynthia Nielsen!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To show notability we need independent references (not from the subject or employers or member organisations) but from others commenting on her work or person
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello, Pirhayati. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Veris Ltd, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hello, Pirhayati. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Holly M. Lewis, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Hello, Pirhayati. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Audrey McKinney, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Tech University Department of Philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Owen Webb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, thanks for your contribution! If possible, it would be great to add references to reviews of Ketner's work--typically a named chair at a large research university like Texas Tech satisfies WP:NACADEMIC but evidence of independent attention to his work would really help bring the entry up to WP standards, as even in the case of academics, entries should be based on secondary sources as much as possible. Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 00:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Reza Jalaeipour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (signed)Dogs curiositytalk to me!10:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Jenkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (signed)Dogs curiositytalk to me!10:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Right now if you search Karen Green in Google, she appears as Karen L. Green in the Knowledge Graph. She is also referred to as Karen L. Green in David Foster Wallace. I thought that maybe the natural disambiguation is better, but feel free to change the titles as you wish. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The knowledge graph derives its information in part from Wikipedia, so we created that situation. I'll make the change. Thanks, --Vexations (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And it'll probably get a bit more complicated because of the sheer number of Karen Greens. At least one other is also an artist, and it looks as if several others have published a book. Vexations (talk) 22:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. this is a borderline WP:NACADEMIC pass and the thing that tips the balance is not sourced (member of the RSC). His bio at the university doesn't mention it [1]
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Russ Shafer-Landau. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Zipi Israeli, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguilltalk23:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ways to improve The Early Heidegger and Medieval Philosophy
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. WP:FLOWERY text in the synopsis section needs to be re-written.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Well, I didn't add to the references of Wolfe Mays because I thought his notability is obvious. He is not notable because of the society ane the journal. He is notable because of his significant contributions and prominent students. I'll add the references. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 11:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How would it be obvious if you don't state it? The journal has already been redirected to the society by another editor. And, Mays can't WP:INHERIT notability from his students - though it won't hurt to link to them. Cabayi (talk) 10:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notability does not need to be stated in the article (Article content does not determine notability). It is obvious by a small search. You can bring him to AFD if you want.Ali Pirhayati (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
2. The point of every article is public distribution of information(!), but the notability may not be clear from the content. If another user is uncertain about notability, he can search different sources, he can tag the article or bring it to AFD and pursue the process until the notability is proven/rejected. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 11:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So, someone googles one of these 3 topics, comes to wikipedia to find out more... and your best idea is that they should go back to google??? That defeats the whole point of wikipedia. Cabayi (talk) 11:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
First, I spoke about a Wikipedian not "someone". The general user will not need to search about notability. Second, that's what the guideline says. You can discuss the problem with the guideline in its talk page. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 11:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I refer you back to your own point - "The point of every article is public distribution of information" ~ that's public, not just editors. That point is not best served by sending readers back to google for more information. Despite your repeated assertions that AFD is the way forward, I'd prefer that the articles were improved to make the point of the subjects' notability. You claim you have the additional information, yet fight back at every request to include it. I don't understand your logic. Cabayi (talk) 12:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did not send readers back to google for more information. I created a stub article and I mentioned that it is a stub and others should help completing it (I may have wanted to complete it in the future). It's a common practice in Wikipedia. Many articles are stub. AFD is not an alternative to improving the article; it is a process for discussing about notability. Any article can be improved no matter how notable it is. The notability is a problem within Wikipedia. A notable article may be stub and incomplete while a non-notable article may be long and full of information. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"I did not send readers back to google for more information."
"the notability may not be clear from the content. If another user is uncertain about notability, he can search different sources"
Hello, Pirhayati. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your addition to James Giles (philosopher) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
