User talk:Paperpopscissors

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Paperpopscissors, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dhwani Gautam, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Coderzombie (talk) 14:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhwani Gautam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Dhwani Gautam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Coderzombie (talk) 14:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello, Paperpopscissors. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 06:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SpacemanSpiff, I am not related to 'Dhwani Gautam' in any manner. I live in the same state as he does and study Masters in Philosophy in the subject of Mass Communication. There is a revival happening in the Gujarati Film Industry and I happen to enjoy being a part of the history in the making. I am trying to document whatever is happening in this Cinema through whatever contributions that I make and the new breed of Gujarati film makers and films happen to interest me. I enjoy writing about these filmmakers and films and getting their imprint out there in the larger world. Regarding the image, as a part of the larger media and communications fraternity, I am sure the filmmaker in question would not mind releasing his copyright to any of his images used for such documentation purposes since he has a very public profile on most of social media platforms. Paperpopscissors (talk) 09:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dhwani Gautam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhwani Gautam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhwani Gautam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kamlesh Bhuptani[edit]

The article Kamlesh Bhuptani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable enough on his own.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 07:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Ribbon Entertainment for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Ribbon Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Ribbon Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ondikku Ondi Official Poster.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Ondikku Ondi Official Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alpesh Kotadia) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Alpesh Kotadia.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Alpesh Kotadia. Note that the article requires some more sources to back up some of its statements.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alpesh Kotadia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpesh Kotadia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpesh Kotadia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gajab Thai Gayo has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gajab Thai Gayo. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gajab Thai Gayo (April 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gazal world was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As commented by User:DaxServer, we need at least 2 reviews from critics published in reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gajab Thai Gayo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gajab Thai Gayo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gazal world (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paperpopscissors. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paperpopscissors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a different person helping out a friend with the listings he has been doing related to Gujarati cinema, there is no conflict of interest here, I only suggested whatever I did based on the logic I believed in good faith that may convince the wikipedia team to not delete the page; moreover on all the edits I have ever done over the years, feel free to check your databases on every single edit entry documentation I have done based on your stipulated guidelines, if you do not like it, issue a notice for god's sake, instead of randomly blocking people like that from using the platform; additionally I am neither of the same gender, nor in the same field, nor the same person nor working at the same place; however, we are in the same city, furthermore after all the donations I made to wikipedia over the years, I believed the last thing I would face would be a block over something trivial Paperpopscissors (talk) 12:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether you have donated or not- while we thank you- is immaterial, as donations are collected and used by the Foundation, not us editors. The block was not at random, but based on your behavior. You talk about helping a friend(see meat puppetry) but there are two other accounts involved here, not just one. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.