User talk:Orenburg1/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Orenburg1. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I have been on the ride Starship 3000 where you get stuck to the wall due to the force of the spinning of the ride. Is this the best example tthat of how someone can experience Hypergravity?Luwychocki13 (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
Thank you for your contibution in mprotect of India Education Program. Feel free to write Pranav Manghat (talk) 06:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
|
Welcome
Welcome on Wikipedia, Orenburg1! Thank you for your contributions on squirrels. You may be interested in joining the Wikiproject on rodents to help improve Wikipedia's information on rodents. I hope you'll have a lot of pleasure editing Wikipedia in the future. Kind regards, Ucucha 15:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- I replied on my own talk page. Ucucha 14:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits to Planet Earth (TV series)
Hi Orenburg1 and welcome to wikipedia. I hope that you have a good time here and enjoy editing. In regard of your recent edits to the article Planet Earth, you changed "summer" to "spring" in several sections and "6 months" to "4 months" in the case of Penguins in the Antarctic. Would you be able to explain the rationale for your edits please? Sincerely, Antarctic-adventurer (talk) 12:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
I should have put a note. I reverted edits by IP's 70.239.11.123 & 76.205.81.217 made on 8th and 11th November 2010. It seems that there is a person out there who persistently changes "spring" to "summer" on various pages and also likes to mess with dates. From the pattern of edits I suspect that they are also using IP's 76.205.88.228, 76.205.90.138, 76.205.82.239 and 70.239.10.245 which are all in the same geolocation and possibly some others.
- OK, Thanks for your reverts. This kind of vandalism is hard to spot so well done for finding it! Without going back and listening to the original narration I can't remember which one was correct. Antarctic-adventurer (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
FYI
I undid your edit to Diamond Star. I can not understand why you made it. Would you care to explain it to me? I'll keep your talkpage watched. Debresser (talk) 21:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- I was just doing some general copyediting and typo correction. I deleted the repeated words. It read "Diamond Star, Diamond-Star..." While I am looking at the page doesnt the entry for BPM 37093 which says in part "...estimated to be a 10 billion trillion trillion trillion carat diamond." go a little further than the article actually says?
- Now I see. You deleted the first instance without the "-" and left the second instance with the "-".
- Ah yes. I'll remove that. Some joke, probably. Debresser (talk) 22:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 07:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for your copy-editing there. Also perhaps help to get these Harvnb references quite right. Si Trew (talk) 07:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Simon - I answered on the article talkpage.
Talkback
Message added 23:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Kevin (talk) 23:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Orenburg1, I've reverted your edit to Saniwa as I couldn't see an explanation for why you reverted the article back 4 days. All the information seemed to me to be referenced, reliable and well-written so I was wondering why you removed it? I was made aware of it as some of the information you removed is currently referenced on the Main Page in the DYK section. If you have any questions, please leave them on my talk page. Regards, Woody (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- I thought something like that might have happened given your first edit to the article. Saving old enough versions is easy enough to do, I'm sure I remember doing it at least once! No harm done, all is back as it should be now. Thanks, Woody (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Copy edit tagging
Hi Orenburg1, I just wanted to let you know that there is a discussion regarding your tagging at the GOCE. The tagging comes at a time when the Guild is holding a drive, and has resulted in a huge dent in the Guild's efforts. Cheers. --SMasters (talk) 01:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Thankyou for correction.
Very glad that your typo hunt spotted the error "altough" in Queen's Logic. Thanks. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 13:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
For your copyedit of the History of the Republic of Ireland page. Much appreciated.
Jdorney (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Spelling
Hi! As my English teacher says "we all need an editor". So I thought I'd point out that on your user page, you've misspelled "prejudice". Brambleclawx 19:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Come Help Edit!
I'd be happy if you'd contribute more to the Lego Ninjago: The Series article. Your original help was great, thanks. I posted some suggestions on the discussion page as well.
If you want you can watch more episodes of the series on youtube. I believe a user named XmasToys has several uploaded.
Mike44456 (talk) 04:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Jennifer Elise Cox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Privileged (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.
Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.
I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.
Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)
To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=73565893 (HTTPS).
Best Regards, Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.
UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Zinfandel
I see you reverted Praetorian3005 (talk · contribs) at this article. He is/was a sock of the then blocked Imperator1974 (talk · contribs) who has edited/created a number of articles with similar content. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, you may know that, I see you've reverted their other edits. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes I noticed and reverted some edits because they were unreferenced and badly written. I suspect that with some mentoring (not a skill that I have) he could become a good editor but the use of socks and abusive responses does not help.Orenburg1 (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work fixing up spelling, especially on those Warriors articles! Brambleclawx 19:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC) |
2(,)000 Guineas
Comma or no comma. Thanks for highlighting this: it seems that opinion is divided on the matter. I'll try to get a consensus at the Project page. Tigerboy1966 14:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias
You must have a keen eye to have spotted it, but I really appreciate your help on improving the article. Thank you very much! Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 10:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
- Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
- If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Anoter Barstar for yu, or mabe not
Thanks for clearing up my mistakes, which I have to point out are mainly due to a terribly old, sticky keyboard rather than ignorance. I was going to give you the Copyeditor's Barnstar, but I see you already have one of those, so I'll just say thanks for all your hard work and patience. Tigerboy1966 20:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank yuo. Orenburg1 (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. When you recently edited Islamic Institute of Toronto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graduate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
A FP for your collection
Hi there. Well done with all the spelling corrections. Sad to say, this is a false positive - almost incredibly, the source URL is spelt wrongly. I've left a note with an archive link on the talk page and will try to sort it out if I get a chance. For now, I've reverted it to the right-wrong (old) spelling. Hope this helps. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI
When you undid the vandalism at Richardson's ground squirrel, you reverted to another, also-vandalized version. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Damn-meant to get that one as well-must have been getting tired. Good on you for fixing it.
Undoing edits to Metropolitan Library
Hi: I removed those lines about Steve Kern & Mick Cornett from the Metropolitan Library System (Oklahoma) entry simply because I don't think they contribute to the entry. My intentions weren't to dismiss these issues or to censor them but I don't think that they add anything helpful/informative to this article. I think there are venues online in which this content can be shared, but I don't think a Wikipedia article about Metropolitan Library is the best one for this information. I look forward to hearing your feedback. Tspindle (talk) 14:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Tspindle. I reverted your edit because there was no reason given for the deletion of these rather controversial issues. I think that it is important that controversies such as this are not airbrushed out of Wikipedia. However reading it carefully I would agree that it adds nothing to the article and would be better confined to the entries of the individuals concerned, something I will leave to someone else as I have no ax to grind here. I will unrevert; the fact that the controversy existed remains but it probably could do with copy editing to be more concise. This discussion should probably also be copied to the article talk page. Appreciate your bringing it here rather than just reverting again.
Thanks for understanding & for the tip on how I can be a better editor in the future. Tspindle (talk) 19:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Revert
Can you tell me why you removed the orphan tag from Udokan mine when there is still no articles that link to it?--Zayeem (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Apologies - my mistake. I have corrected my edit
- Okay no problem, but I would suggest, instead of reverting you should remove the tags manually if necessary. It's quite annoying for the user to see his edits getting reverted. Cheers.--Zayeem (talk) 21:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Why did you delete in the 1848 Hungarian revolution article?
It was a lot of work to translate it from Hungarian wiki page, and search many references n English language books of academic historians, it contained a lot of basic informations (such as goverments ). It is close to vandalism with very hypocritical insufficient grounds (like sockpuppet stubes etc....)--Tumbsder (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- I see you are a new editor who has made only 4 edits, all to this one article. Your edits have been adding back material previously added by Stubes99 and subsequently removed by other editors. They are generally badly written, inaccurate in many cases and not neutral in presentation. I would normally welcome a new editor but I believe that you may be a sockpuppet of Stubes99. If I am mistaken I sincerely apologize.
Orenburg1 (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Can you point out concrete way, which parts are not neutral? Exactly? You can found them in the books of the references. We can edit it, if they differ from the references. I'm curious. Thank you!--Tumbsder (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC) If you don't like the grammar, you can correct it. --Tumbsder (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- I note that you do not deny being a sockpupppet of Stubes99. I do not intend to debate with a sockpuppet.Orenburg1 (talk) 08:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for "extention" fix
(No idea what i was thinking ... did i fixate on "extenT"??
--Jerzy•t 21:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kadambini Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame Academy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karen Reyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan Nolan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Catherines. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Ube delicious Enterprise
Please fix this article for just a reason .. because at writing out this article it was unfinished drafting information which i'm emphasized to gathered or make an additional scope for that mentioned article. i am requesting you to refix this article urgently — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick F. Matre (talk • contribs) 11:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Aircraft
Many apologies. I thought I had undone my edit before it was even made, but it appears that I inadvertently pushed the button. Sorry! -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Please
Please don't delete please ignore my page issues Bollywood Hunter (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Recreating previously deleted pages and removing speedy deletion tags without good reason are generally not good ideas - they are likely to get you blocked from editing. Nobody wants to discourage new editors but I think you need to learn more about what Wikipedia is and how it works. Please see the notes left on your talk page. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
- Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 17
Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria
- New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
- Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
- New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Faiz Syed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faiz Syed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faiz Syed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. for (;;) (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 18
Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads
- New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
- Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
- TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
- OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 19
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti
- New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
- New Library Card Platform and Conference news
- Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Orenburg1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
References needed for Cumulonimbus and aviation
Hi,
you added a tag asking for more sources in the article Cumulonimbus and aviation. There are already 54 references and in our opinion the contentious points of the article are duly referenced. Would you mind to be more specific which points need to have extra references. It would help. For now, I am in the dark. Thanks. Malosse (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
(Notification per WP:CAN.)
Books and Bytes - Issue 20
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)
- Partner resource expansions
- New search tool for finding TWL resources
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikidata Visiting Scholar
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks!
for correcting my speling erors on Proximity Ligation Assay. I ain't no Inglish mayjor! DennisPietras (talk) 02:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corticiaceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giulia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed.
Books and Bytes - Issue 21
Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikipedia Library User Group
- Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
- Spotlight: Library Card Platform
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for noticing !
Thanks for noticing the new book article I wrote, Think Big and Kick Ass ! What do you think of the article? Sagecandor (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Following your note I took another look at it (and made a couple of minor copyedits). I have not read the book so can not really comment (and do not want to) on the content except to say that approaching it as a casual reader it seems reasonably balanced. The quoted refs seem to say that not as much money was given to charity as the book implies but the article does not make that point - a minor comment from me. Good articles are more difficult to write than it seems at first and I hope you carry on. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 18:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 22
Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017
- New and expanded research accounts
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Thanks for copyediting Wikipedia.
I have doubts about the appropriateness of your adding "Sic" to instances of the word "glamorous / glamourous" when it is spelled with a "u". You seem to have done this many times. I am not sure that the "glamourous" spelling is inappropriate. Is it not a common spelling? Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
- Thank you, and also for your measured question rather than just reverting the edits, which is appreciated. The Oxford English Dictionary and Merriam-Webster say "glamorous" is correct in both British and American English (as does Wiktionary). The OED website says "Note that although glamor is an American spelling of glamour, glamorous is not an American form. This word is spelled the same way in both British and American English, and glamourous is regarded as an error".
Regards. Orenburg1 (talk) 16:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- That seems like a fair explanation. I will not disagree, but I will lightly challenge it. Merriam Webster says that "glamorous" is a less common variation. Also, these two examples above were Indian English. There is a little evidence that this is an acceptable variant and also we have no evidence about Indian English. I am not sure either way. Wiktionary seems like a fair place to sort this but I am not sure how that works. Thanks for the chat. I support what you are doing if you want to continue. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Fair point, shame that MW is not as emphatic as the OED. I shall give third party spellings of glamourous from American sources the benefit of the doubt. Indian English spelling normally follows British English, I am not aware of an exception here, but I have never come across an Indian English dictionary; if you know of one please let me know. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 07:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- That seems like a fair explanation. I will not disagree, but I will lightly challenge it. Merriam Webster says that "glamorous" is a less common variation. Also, these two examples above were Indian English. There is a little evidence that this is an acceptable variant and also we have no evidence about Indian English. I am not sure either way. Wiktionary seems like a fair place to sort this but I am not sure how that works. Thanks for the chat. I support what you are doing if you want to continue. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Black September
There are three aircrafts. Why "aircraft"? Makeandtoss (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- The singular and plural forms in English are the same. See Nouns with identical singular and plural. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 08:11, 11 August 2017 (UTC).
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Orenburg1. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Books and Bytes - Issue 23
Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017
- Library card
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
- Bytes in brief
Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 24
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
- Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
- Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
On punctuation
I'll get back to you... Wikidalien (talk) 20:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Random punctuation
On my, according to two people here, *random* use of punctuation in my article edits:
There has been a general decline, particularly in American culture, since, shortly after the advent of the Internet (that word, by the way, is ALWAYS capitalized), and particularly, the 'World-Wide Web', in what used to be considered, 'good' English grammar. But a trend towards degeneration has been firmly set in place - mainly due to ignorance of the rules of the language, and, sheer laziness of attitude and that, mainly in punctuation, spelling, syntax, grammar, etc. This, I well remember, was predicted early on by veteran computer users, and, in particular, those who were writers. This trend, of course, is due to the influx and influence of the general populace, which, seemingly all at once, introduced a 'lowest-common-denominator' policy on textual communication, by people who, typically, were not at all familiar with keyboards, namely typewriters, as used in textual communication of any kind. This has affect the comprehension and interpretation of said communications, to such a degree, that, more than 80% of all Internet-originated, textual communications sent by, even close family members, are misunderstood by the receiver, and another 80%, of any given message's content, is not correctly interpreted.
Punctuation, is the 'flavor' of a statement, or clause, as it relates to the previous, and the following statement or clause. As the eye perceives any good artwork, you are being guided - sensibly, and rationally through it, by way of proper punctuation. See how easy, and conversational that was to read? Now, try this:
"There has been a general decline particularly in america since shortly after the advent of the internet which by the way is always capitalized and particularly the world wide web in what used to be considered good english grammar a trend towards degeneration has been firmly set in place mainly due to ignorance of the rules of the english language mainly in punctuation spelling syntax grammar and etc." No, I wouldn't want to have to read it again, either.
There is, also, probably something else to consider. That is, your personal familiarity or unfamiliarity, with the language and how you learned to speak it, and, how you read it. If you're under about the age of 30, then you, and those before you, are speaking it differently. Your 'discontinued use' of - what used to be required adeptness in - the intricacies of English grammar, doesn't make my memory, and my retention of it, wrong. Good writing should resemble, even mimic, oral conversation. Punctuation gives a string of ideas, or a clause - or a string, or a progression of clauses - clarity, and sensibility. See that? If you didn't quite catch it, read it again.
According to Strunk and White, a certain amount of 'literary freedom', is granted to the writer, who may wish to use it as a literary 'device', or, in such a way as to emphasize something, which, may not present itself, readily, to the reader. Punctuation should present, properly, the idea proposed, in a way that fits, and suits, the desired, chosen way of expression of the writer. The way it is written and punctuated, depends on the content, dialect, phraseology (British, or American) emphasis of content or idea, and, even local colloquialism.
DO NOT criticize, or otherwise reprimand me, for my application of something, that is going to assist you, in the understanding, and readability, of each idea, as it occurs, and is presented, in a way that, in the end, makes your reading experience, one, of better, overall comprehension. Now, read that rather lengthy sentence again - this time, with no punctuation. Have fun. DO NOT try to minimalize my level of continued, and, continuing education, unless, you are quite well-prepared to assert comparisons. If, at this point, you didn't quite catch what I just said, read it again. If all else fails - I'll do the writing; you, do the reading. Wikidalien (talk) 00:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oh dear, what a bad-tempered rant. Rather silly as well. Orenburg1 (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Orenburg1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 25
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
- OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Heimat episodes
Hello, I saw you added there were no sources/references on the article which details the episodes and plot. I wondered if you could elaberate on this, in hope I can find what is nessesary to improve the article. Regards Heimatchen (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Heimatchen - I cleaned up some English and typos and tagged the article as it had no references at all. Wikipedia requires verifiability; see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Reading Help:Referencing for beginners may be useful. Hope this helps.
- Regards. Orenburg1 (talk) 09:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi there, thanks for that. I will have a read.
- Regarding the plots, which is purpose of episodes page, they are direct from the episodes/films themselves. I thought plots do not require references? If it is about the title names, run times, etc, I'm sure I'll be able to find somewhere.
- Also, there for Heimat 1, there is a Blu-Ray being released in a few months, which I'll be getting. Any helpful information from interviews or the booklet or documentary, I will gladly add. Regards. Heimatchen (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rizwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rizwan Ahmed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed. Orenburg1 (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahtahkakoop Indian Reserve No. 104, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Kindly fixed by Onel5969. Orenburg1 (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 26
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
- Bytes in brief
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All Together Now (UK TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Westphal Neighbourhood and Westphal Community
Hi Orenburg1, Wikipedia only has one page for a Westphal article, while there are actually two Westphal's with one being a neighbourhood located in Dartmouth, NS and the other being a separate community outside Dartmouth, NS. I was wondering if you could help me gather sources so we could get the Westphal community up on Wikipedia and have it show on Google Maps. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Its all be cleared
Books & Bytes - Issue 27
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
- User Group
- Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
- Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
squirrel
Hi. I removed the squirrel image because it was wrongly described - as my edit note said. I didn't intend to delete anything else, so have removed the image again keeping that other data. Thanks for spotting my editing error. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Charlesjsharp. Maybe I should have just reversed the IUCN bit - I just looked at the photo again and think it is probably not X. princeps. Difficult to tell from the photo. Orenburg1 (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Help add image the article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you very much.116.102.56.175 (talk) 08:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Ferdinand Feichtner
Hi Orenburg1, How are you? I don't think we have spoken before. Yip is thr short answer. When Feichtner was captured after the war, he had to write some homework they called it, by TICOM, which is essentially all the stuff he did while he was working as a Luftwaffe officer. As part of the Germany surrendering unconditionally, German soldiers had to offer all the information they had to whoever in the allies wanted it. TICOM and a British outfit CSDIC sent teams in to capture and interrogate important Germans who were involved in the intelligence side of things. Feichtner was one of those captured. So it is his homework you are reading. He was very busy Luftwaffe officer. I have other homework examples, e.g. Otto Buggisch who was also captured and Hans Rohrbach who was a brilliant mathematican and crypanalyst, one of their best and did important work after the war. He wrote a 98 page homework document on a solving the O2 strip cipher, which is dense mathematical treatise and too long for Wikipedia really, which is unfortunate. All these documents are in the public domain and have been cleared for use by Wikipedia, and Diaanna. regards. scope_creep (talk) 10:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest buildings in South America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Majestic Building (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 28
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
- #1Bib1Ref
- New partners
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
- Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Orenburg1, Thank you for your edits to Aeroflot Flight 1661. Spelling and Grammar are unfortunately my weak area. I concur with your edits in this article. Thank you. - Samf4u (talk) 01:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- No probs. Nice set of articles by the way. Orenburg1 (talk) 10:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 29
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
- New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
- Wikimania
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 30
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
- Library Card translation
- Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
For your diligence in identifying, and promptly correcting, spelling errors and typographical errors. Thank you and well done! Headhitter (talk) 16:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Orenburg1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presbyterian Church (USA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Presbyterian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Fixed.
Creating article title "CB Edit"
Hi, i got your ref. from Article Thomas Frey. I`m trying to creat a new article title "CB Edit". i have just one source https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-CB-edit-and-tell-us-how-we-edit-photo-in-picart. I have tried to creat article but it removed. i can`t understand how to creat this one so will you please help me to creat this article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayur Bhatt Shiv (talk • contribs) 11:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 31
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
- OAWiki
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Arturo Alfonso Schomburg
Thank you for your contributions to the article on Arturo Alfonso Schomburg. It has been among the favorite articles which I have written because it tells that Puerto Ricans have made positive contributions to the United States. The fact is that Schomburg was born in Puerto Rico when Puerto Rico was still a Spanish Colony and therefore he was not an American citizen.
As a matter of fact Puerto Rican citizenship was first legislated by the United States Congress in Article 7 of the Foraker Act of 1900. When Puerto Ricans were granted a limited citizenship in 1917, by the Jones Act, they didn't have to give their Puerto Rican Citizenship. On November 18, 1997, the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, through its ruling in Miriam J. Ramirez de Ferrer v. Juan Mari Brás, reaffirmed the standing existence of the Puerto Rican citizenship. The CIA World Fact Book, states that the nationality of Puerto Ricans is not "American" but, in fact, "Puerto Rican."
Not only that, he was proud of being a Puerto Rican and referred to himself as an "Afroborinqueño" which means "Afro-Puerto Rican". He became a member of the "Revolutionary Committee of Puerto Rico" and became an active advocate of Puerto Rico's and Cuba's independence from Spain.
Let's go by the true facts, this being an encyclopedia. We can not re-write history to our liking. Now, thank you once more for your good-faith editing. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- I think you are berating the wrong person here. I merely corrected the grammar from "...a American..." to "...an American..."; I have no opinion on his nationality. If you wish to harangue someone for altering his nationality then you need to talk to 2601:cd:c101:5870:41e2:bb45:f4c4:5363.
- Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia
Iam public figure..i need wikipedia..please create for me آرمان عفیفه (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Minor barnstar | |
For your tireless efforts correcting spelling mistakes/typos. Your hard work does not go unnoticed. Keep it up! - LouisAragon (talk) 00:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you for this kindness.Orenburg1 (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Always welcome! :-) - LouisAragon (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Matthew Gordon Banks
Thank you for correcting my poor typing on the above. I see Watermillock came straight back. He has played around not usually flatteringly with this biog for some years under Watermillock and other usernames.Charlbury4 (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited God Save the Queen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Television (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter
- April 2019—Issue 001
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Tree of Life newsletter!
Sturgeon nominated by Atsme, reviewed by Chiswick Chap |
Cretoxyrhina nominated by Macrophyseter |
- WikiCup heating up
Tree of Life editors are making a respectable showing in this year's WikiCup, with three regular editors advancing to the third round. Overall winner from 2016, Casliber, topped the scoreboard in points for round 2, getting a nice bonus for bringing Black mamba to FA. Enwebb continues to favor things remotely related to bats, bringing Stellaluna to GA. Plants editor Guettarda also advanced to round 3 with several plant-related DYKs.
- Wikipedia page views track animal migrations, flowers blooming
A March 2019 paper in PLOS Biology found that Wikipedia page views vary seasonally for species. With a dataset of 31,751 articles about species, the authors found that roughly a quarter of all articles had significant seasonal variations in page views on at least one language version of Wikipedia. They examined 245 language versions. Page views also peaked with cultural events, such as views of the Great white shark article during Shark Week or Turkey during Thanksgiving.
- Did you know ... that Tree of Life editors bring content to the front page nearly every day?
* ... that Dippy is the most famous dinosaur skeleton in the world? (1 April)
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter
- May 2019—Issue 002
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Cretoxyrhina by Macrophyseter |
Spinophorosaurus by FunkMonk/Jens Lallensack |
- Fundamental changes being discussed at WikiProject Biology
On 23 May, user Prometheus720 created a talk page post, "Revamp of Wikiproject Biology--Who is In?". In the days since, WP:BIOL has been bustling with activity, with over a dozen editors weighing in on this discussion, as well as several others that have subsequently spawned. An undercurrent of thought is that WP:BIOL has too many subprojects, preventing editors from easily interacting and stopping a "critical mass" of collaboration and engagement. Many mergers and consolidations of subprojects have been tentatively listed, with a consolidation of WikiProjects Genetics + Molecular and Cell Biology + Computational Biology + Biophysics currently in discussion. Other ideas being aired include updating old participants lists, redesigning project pages to make them more user-friendly, and clearly identifying long- and short-term goals.
- Editor Spotlight: These editors want you to write about dinosaurs
Editors FunkMonk and Jens Lallensack had a very fruitful month, collaborating to bring two dinosaur articles to GA and then nominating them both for FA. They graciously decided to answer some questions for the first ToL Editor Spotlight, giving insight to their successful collaborations, explaining why you should collaborate with them, and also sharing some tidbits about their lives off-Wikipedia.
1) Enwebb: How long have you two been collaborating on articles?
- Jens Lallensack: I started in the German Wikipedia in 2005 but switched to the English Wikipedia because of its very active dinosaur project. My first major collaboration with FunkMonk was on Heterodontosaurus in 2015.
- FunkMonk: Yeah, we had interacted already on talk pages and through reviewing each other's articles, and at some point I was thinking of expanding Heterodontosaurus, and realised Jens had already written the German Wikipedia version, so it seemed natural to work together on the English one. Our latest collaboration was Spinophorosaurus, where by another coincidence, I had wanted to work on that article for the WP:Four Award, and it turned out that Jens had a German book about the expedition that found the dinosaur, which I wouldn't have been able to utilise with my meagre German skills. Between those, we also worked on Brachiosaurus, a wider Dinosaur Project collaboration between several editors.
2) Enwebb: Why dinosaurs?
- JL: Because of the huge public interest in them. But dinosaurs are also highly interesting from a scientific point of view: key evolutionary innovations emerged within this group, such as warm-bloodedness, gigantism, and flight. Dinosaur research is, together with the study of fossil human remains, the most active field in paleontology. New scientific techniques and approaches tend to get developed within this field. Dinosaur research became increasingly interdisciplinary, and now does not only rely on various fields of biology and geology, but also on chemistry and physics, among others. Dinosaurs are therefore ideal to convey scientific methodology to the general public.
- FM: As outlined above, dinosaurs have been described as a "gateway to science"; if you learn about dinosaurs, you will most likely also learn about a lot of scientific fields you would not necessarily be exposed to otherwise. On a more personal level, having grown up with and being influenced by various dinosaur media, it feels pretty cool to help spread knowledge about these animals, closest we can get to keeping them alive.
3) Enwebb: Why should other editors join you in writing articles related to paleontology? Are you looking to attract new editors, or draw in experienced editors from other areas of Wikipedia?
- JL: Because we are a small but active and helpful community. Our Dinosaur collaboration, one of the very few active open collaborations in Wikipedia, makes high-level writing on important articles easier and more fun. Our collaboration is especially open to editors without prior experience in high-level writing. But we do not only write articles: several WikiProject Dinosaur participants are artists who do a great job illustrating the articles, and maintain an extensive and very active image review system. In fact, a number of later authors started with contributing images.
- FM: Anyone who is interested in palaeontology is welcome to try writing articles, and we would be more than willing to help. I find that the more people that work on articles simultaneously with me, the more motivation I get to write myself. I am also one of those editors who started out contributing dinosaur illustrations and making minor edits, and only began writing after some years. But when I got to it, it wasn't as intimidating as I had feared, and I've learned a lot in the process. For example anatomy; if you know dinosaur anatomy, you have a very good framework for understanding the anatomy of other tetrapod animals, including humans.
4) Enwebb: Between the two of you, you have over 300 GA reviews. FunkMonk, you have over 250 of those. What keeps you coming back to review more articles?
- FM: One of the main reasons I review GANs is to learn more about subjects that seem interesting (or which I would perhaps not come across otherwise). There are of course also more practical reasons, such as helping an article on its way towards FAC, to reduce the GAN backlog, and to "pay back" when I have a nomination up myself. It feels like a win-win situation where I can be entertained by interesting info, while also helping other editors get their nominations in shape, and we'll end up with an article that hopefully serves to educate a lot of people (the greater good).
- JL: Because I enjoy reading Wikipedia articles and like to learn new things. In addition, reviews give me the opportunity to have direct contact with the authors, and help them to make their articles even better. This is quite rewarding for me personally. But I also review because I consider our GA and FA system to be of fundamental importance for Wikipedia. When I started editing Wikipedia (the German version), the article promotion reviews motivated me and improved my writing skills a lot. Submitting an article for review requires one to get serious and take additional steps to bring the article to the best quality possible. GAs and FAs are also a good starting point for readers, and may motivate them to become authors themselves.
5) Enwebb: What are your editing preferences? Any scripts or gadgets you find invaluable?
- FM: One script that everyone should know about is the duplink highlight tool. It will show duplinks within the intro and body of a given article separately, and it seems a lot of people still don't know about it, though they are happy when introduced to it. I really liked the citationbot too (since citation consistency is a boring chore to me), but it seems to be blocked at the moment due to some technical issues.
- JL: I often review using the Wikipedia Beta app on my smartphone, as it allows me to read without needing to sit in front of the PC. For writing, I find the reference management software Zotero invaluable, as it generates citation templates automatically, saving a lot of time.
- Editor's note: I downloaded Zotero and tried it for the first time and think it is a very useful tool. More here.
6) Enwebb: What would surprise the ToL community to learn about your life off-wiki?
- FM: Perhaps that I have no background in natural history/science, but work with animation and games. But fascination with and knowledge of nature and animals is actually very helpful when designing and animating characters and creatures, so it isn't that far off, and I can actually use some of the things I learn while writing here for my work (when I wrote the Dromaeosauroides article, it was partially to learn more about the animal for a design-school project).
- JL: That I am actually doing research on dinosaurs. Though I avoid writing about topics I publish research on, my Wikipedia work helps me to keep a good general overview over the field, and quite regularly I can use what I learned while writing for Wikipedia for my research.
Get in touch with these editors regarding collaboration at WikiProject Dinosaurs!
- Marine life continues to dominate ToL DYKs
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Tree of Life Newsletter
- July 2019—Issue 004
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
List of felids by PresN |
Letter-winged kite by Casliber |
The WikiCup, an annual editing competition, is now in its fourth round. Casliber, consistent participant since 2010 and winner in 2016, is currently dominating Group A with 601 points. Largely responsible is the successful Featured Article nomination of Masked booby. The other remaining Tree of Life participant, Enwebb, is participating in her first ever WikiCup. In this round, she has a grand total of...5 points. But with the recent Featured Article nomination of Megabat, she stands to gain 600 points if successful. As it stands, though, it appears that at least one ToL editor is headed to the fifth and final round of 8 contestants, which begins September 1. Thus far, all participants in the WikiCup have generated 17 Featured Articles, 116 Good Articles, 16 Featured Lists, and 57 Featured Pictures. The Good Article Nominations backlog has been reduced as well, with 286 Good Article Reviews. |
For this month's editor spotlight we're joined by Charlesjsharp, a longtime contributor to Wikimedia Commons with a plethora of featured pictures on English Wikipedia. 1) Starsandwhales: How long have you been editing Wikipedia, and how did you get interested? How did you begin your journey of photographing wildlife?
2) S&W: Over the years, you've taken photos of many different organisms from birds to insects to big cats; you have an extensive list of favorite images. Which animals have been the most exciting for you to photograph?
3) S&W: Many articles under ToL have requests for people to add images that can go unanswered. What can the community do to improve the coverage of different organisms on Wikipedia, especially when it comes to images?
4) S&W: What advice would you give to people new to photographing wildlife?
5) S&W: What would the Tree of Life community be surprised to learn about your life off-wiki?
* An example of cumbersome code: getting the layout of my responses to your questions. So dated, and no online spellchecker. |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter
- August 2019—Issue 005
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Letter-winged kite by Casliber |
Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk |
Guest column by Thomas Shafee (Evolution and evolvability), Editor in Chief of WikiJournal of Science
Firstly, WikiJSci can be a complementary system for FA review (getting external review, input, and validity). When an Wikipedia article is nominated (via WP:JAN), journal editors go out to non-Wikipedian academics and researchers who have published on the subject on the last five years and invite them to give feedback comments (e.g. Peripatric speciation and Baryonyx). The resulting changes can then be integrated back into the Wikipedia article.
Getting more editors involved in Wikipedia is always a high priority. WikiJSci can also be a way to encourage new people to contribute articles (especially on missing/stub/start topics). An example of an article that was written from scratch by a group of non-Wikipedians is Teladorsagia circumcincta. This not only resulted in a new Wikipedia page on an underdeveloped topic, but introduced the idea of Wikimedia contribution to a group of people who had previously never considered it.
The journal can be a way to get multimedia content reviewed or encourage contribution. The same approach could be easily adapted to sounds (e.g. frog mating calls) or videos (e.g. starfish feet motion). It also allows for tracking of those images in new articles via Altmetric (this example has >200, which is bananas). There aren't any biology examples in WikiJSci yet, but the sister medical journal has published a few summary diagrams, photography, and image galleries. Examples include this gallery by Blausen Medical or the diagram of cell disassembly during apoptosis.
For those interested in other Wikimedia sister projects, there's also broad scope for interactions with the WikiJournals. Perhaps peer reviewed teaching resources could be useful to sit alongside sets of Wikipedia articles and be integrated into Wikiversity courses (like this or this)? Can sections of Wikidata & Wikispecies be peer reviewed? What are the potential avenues for integration with WikiCite, WikiFactMine, Scholia, etc.? Currently, WikiJSci is aiming to be very flexible and try out different formats so long as they can be externally peer reviewed. For more info, see the 2019-06-30 Signpost article and the current sister project proposal. |
1) Enwebb: You're very prolific with DYKs, with over 2,000 nominations credited (in fact, I'll highlight which DYK nominations this month were yours below). What made you become so involved in this part of Wikipedia? Why should Tree of Life editors nominate articles for DYK?
2) Enwebb: I noticed that your DYK nominations reflect a diverse array of flora and fauna, from trees, marine invertebrates, birds, fishes, and mammals. How do you decide what to work on?
3) Enwebb: Which of your Wikipedia accomplishments are you most proud of?
4) Enwebb: What motivates you to keep contributing? What's your 10,000 ft view (pardon the non-SI) of the community and Tree of Life?
6) Enwebb: How did you first become interested in natural history?
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you for this kindness.Orenburg1 (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter
- September 2019—Issue 006
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Kosmoceratops by FunkMonk |
Apororhynchus by Mattximus |
|
5
10
15
20
'02
'04
'06
'08
'10
'12
'14
'16
'18
This month saw a vanishingly rare occurrence for the Tree of Life: a new WikiProject joined the fold. WikiProject Diptera, however, is also unusual in being a classroom project. Whether or not this project will stay active once the semester ends remains to be seen. It does not bode well, however, that WP:WikiProject Vespidae—a creation from the same instructor at St. Louis University—faded to obscurity shortly after the fall semester concluded in 2014. WikiProject Vespidae is defunct and now redirects to the Hymenoptera task force of WikiProject Insects. Since 2014, the Tree of Life has seen a string of years where one or zero projects or task forces were created. The only projects and task forces created since then are WikiProject Animal anatomy (2014), Hymenoptera task force (2016), Bats task force (2017), WikiProject Hypericaceae (2018), and now WikiProject Diptera (2019). The year 2006 saw the greatest creation of WikiProjects and task forces, with fourteen still active and the remaining six as "semiactive", "inactive", or "defunct". |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 22:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
My article is not vandalism. I award you this in advance so that you may please stop reverting my edits. DrapalDragon (talk) 16:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you for this award. I shall cherish it and polish it daily.Orenburg1 (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- DD has been warned against inserting original research (the over-complication version) and against edit warring. David notMD (talk) 21:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- David notMD : thanks for letting me know.Orenburg1 (talk) 08:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Im sorry everyone, im new to wikipedia, I didnt know that was edit warring. I wont do it again.DrapalDragon (talk) 07:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- David notMD : thanks for letting me know.Orenburg1 (talk) 08:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- DD has been warned against inserting original research (the over-complication version) and against edit warring. David notMD (talk) 21:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter
- October 2019—Issue 007
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Meinhard Michael Moser by J Milburn |
King brown snake by Casliber |
|
By request from another editor, this month I wrote an overview of ways that content is featured on Wikipedia. Below I have outlined some of the processes for getting content featured: Did You Know (DYK)What is it: A way for articles to appear on the main page of Wikipedia. A short hook in the format of "Did you know...that ___" presents unusual and interesting facts to the reader, hopefully making the reader want to click through to the article How it works: The DYK process has fairly low barriers for participation. The eligibility criteria are few and relatively easy to meet. Some important guidelines:
The process for creating the nomination is somewhat tedious. Instructions can be found here (official instructions) and here ("quick and nice" guide to DYK). Experience is the best teacher here, so don't be afraid to try and fail a few times. The last few DYK nominations I've done, however, have been with the help of SD0001's DYK-helper script, which makes the process a bit more streamlined (you create the template from a popup box on the article; created template is automatically transcluded to nominations page and article talk page) Once your nomination is created and transcluded, it will need to be reviewed. The reviewer will check that the article meets the eligibility criteria, that the hook is short enough, cited, and interesting, and that other requirements are met, such as for images. If you've been credited with more than 5 DYKs, the reviewer will also check that you've reviewed someone else's nomination for each article that you nominate. This is called QPQ (quid pro quo). You can check how many credited DYKs you've had here to see if QPQ is required for you to nominate an article for DYK. Good Article (GA)What it is: A peer review process to determine that an article meets a set of criteria. This adds a symbol to the top of the article. About 1 in 200 articles on Wikipedia is a GA. How it works: You follow the instructions to nominate an article, placing a template on its talk page. Anyone can nominate an article—you don't have to be a major contributor, though it is considered polite to inform the major contributors that you are nominating the article. The article is added to a queue to await a review. In the ToL, it seems that reviews happen pretty quickly, thanks to our dedicated members. Once the review begins, the reviewer will offer suggestions to help the article meet the 6 GA criteria. Upon addressing all concerns, the reviewer will pass the article, and voilà! Good Article! Advice to a first-time nominator: Look at other Good Articles in related areas before nominating. If you're unsure about nominating, consider posting to the talk page of your project to see what other editors think. You can also have a more experienced editor co-nominate the article with you. Featured Article (FA)What it is: An exhaustive peer review to determine that an articles meets the criteria. This adds a to the top of the article. About 1 in 1,000 articles on Wikipedia is a FA. How it works: You follow the instructions to nominate an article, placing a template on its talk page. Nominated articles are usually GAs already. Uninvolved editors can nominate, though the article's regular editors should be consulted first. Several editors will come by offering feedback, eventually supporting or opposing promotion to FA. A coordinator will determine if there is consensus to promote the article to FA. For an editor's first FA, spot checks to verify that the sources support the text are conducted. Advice to a first-time nominator: The Featured Article Candidate (FAC) process is a bit intimidating, but several steps can make your first one easier (speaking as someone who has exactly one). If you also did the GA nomination of the article, you can ask the reviewer for "extra" feedback beyond the GA criteria. You can also formally request a peer review and/or a copy edit from the Guild of Copy Editors to check for content and mechanics. First-time nominators are encouraged to seek the help of a mentor for a higher likelihood of passing their first FAC. Good and Featured Topics (GT and FT)What it is: It took me a while to realize we even had GT and FT on Wikipedia, as they are not very common relative to GA and FA. Both GT and FT are collections of related articles of high quality (all articles at GA or FA, all lists at Featured List). GT/FT have to be at least 3 articles with no obvious gaps in coverage of the topic, along with other criteria. For GT, all articles have to be GA quality and all lists must be FL. For FT, at least half the articles must be FA or FL, with the remaining articles at GA. How it works: Follow the nomination procedures for creating a new topic or adding an article to an existing topic. Other editors weigh in to support or oppose the proposal. Coordinators determine if there is consensus to promote to GT/FT. Advice to a first-time nominator: There are very few GT/FT in Tree of Life (5 GT and 11 FT). Most of the legwork appears to be improving a cohesive set of articles to GA/FA. |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)
An award for you!
The Orthographer's Badge | |
Even while travelling you managed to catch me! Although, taking a look at your massive list of commonly misspelled words it seems only a matter of time before we're all caught at least once. Thank you for (independent)ly tidying up Wikipedia. Pabsoluterince (talk) 01:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC) |
- Pabsoluterince Thank you for these kind words. Orenburg1 (talk) 09:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karmala (Vidhan Sabha constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Pre-existence of Christ, section "In art"
Good morning Orenburg1, with regard to oldid 927812825 rollback, I wish to suggest to end the section titled " In art", with the following statement:
- In some Early Christian sarcophagi, the Logos is distinguished with a beard, "which allows him to appear ancient, even preexistent. In the Catacombs of Domitilla, located near Rome and dated to the fifth century, the Holy Spirit God is depicted as a stylized Christian dove with a branch of olive tree.
It recalls Genesis 8:11–13, the announcement of peace after the human martyrdom of a Saint son of God like Domitilla, or of the enemies of Noah.
Logos is identified with Jesus Christ God and therefore would be appropriate to mention the Holy Spirit God'presence in the Early Christian art and architecture. The latter WP article sources that this historical period extends from the 2nd century to 550 at the latest. Hence, it concerns the Catacombs of Domitilla, which is dated to the fifth century CE.
I ask uniquely to add the sentences highlighted in the Italic font, but -in my modest and argumented opinion- it is highly possible that early Christian martyrs understood and believed all what I am going to summarize. This is an additional reason to mention the "Holy Spirit God as a dove" in Pre-existence of Christ#In art.
While we have God the Father and God the Son depicted with a human-divine male body (both of them), the Holy Spirit God is depicted as one or more holy animals, whose feminine or masculine sex is not specified. it's a very relevant difference. With the artistical and unusual choice of depicting a Divine Person with a common animal and not with a human and sexuated body, we note that early Christians thought the Holy Spirit to be God, but also something of radically different than the other two Divine Persons, who are represented as humans. This artistical choice for a holy place -like a burial- is uniquely possible because of the existence of multiple biblical references to this transubstantiaton of the Holy Spirit into an animal form, e.g. in the Pentecost narration. Differently from Indians in respect of cattles, we don't know early Christians worshiped any dove as being God, even if they had a respectful behavior for animals. So we can suppose they didn't think a dove was the "animal body" of the Holy Spirit God (an aniamal substance), nor that any dove was the corporeal house of an Holy Spirit (like Indians did), but that the Holy Spirit chose to "use" a common dove to appear to humans or that god the Creator gave life to a single animal specifically for that purpose.
Angels, which are created invisible and incorporeal (and therefore without sexuation), are created at image and similitude of the Holy Spirit God, which is the same divinity, but of a different substance than God the Father and God the Son.
Any comment is courtesy appreciated, Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 11:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Micheledisaveriosp Thank you for your comments on my deletion of your edit to the Pre-existence of Christ article which are both :comprehensive and polite. I shall try to respond in the same vein.
- I make extensive, mostly small edits to Wikipedia, mainly to orthography. I am constantly amazed at the amount of unsourced material I :come across and perhaps have a tendency to delete what I perceive as unsourced edits rather readily, which is why I removed your :addition. I was somewhat surprised that an experienced editor made such an addition without a reference.
- I think that you can find support for your proposed change in the reference that already occurs in that section - see pages 34 on, and later in the same book. I am not an expert in this field. I think however wider conclusions could be drawn than you are suggesting.
- Regards.Orenburg1 (talk) 16:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply, I will open a more concise topic on the discussion page of the article.:Regards.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 21:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter
- November 2019—Issue 008
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
King brown snake by Casliber |
News at a Glance |
|
Class is in Session in the Tree of Life |
In an interesting turn of events, this month's guest column is by my alter-ego, Elysia (Wiki Ed): *Puts on Wiki Education hat* Hi everyone, I'm Elysia and I work for Wiki Education. You may know me as Enwebb. I got a request last month to let you know how Wiki Education is intersecting with the Tree of Life subprojects. As one of Wiki Education's major goals is to improve topics related to the sciences, leading to our Communicating Science initiative, we end up supporting quite a few in the biological sciences. Here are the TOL-related courses active this term: What is the impact of student editors in Tree of Life? Altogether, these 16 courses have 347 student participants. As the end of the semester hasn't come yet, these numbers are still growing, but these students have:
Some of our best student work this semester (of any kind, not just biodiversity) has come from Agelaia's Behavioural Ecology course—you may remember this as the course that created WikiProject Diptera. The students have several Good Article nominations, including Dryomyza anilis, Anastrepha ludens, Aedes taeniorhynchus, Drosophila silvestris, Drosophila subobscura, and Ceratitis capitata. And while long-term participation from students is low, there's always the chance that we'll discover a Wikipedian. I had never edited before my Wikipedia assignment in 2017 and I'm still here nearly 20,000 edits later! After I poked around in the beginning of the semester, I had the realization that not many people write Wikipedia, and very few of those have a special interest in bats. If I didn't stick around to write the content, there was no guarantee that it would ever get done. Why are species articles suitable for students? Writing about taxonomic groups is a great fit for students, as it keeps them away from areas where new editors traditionally struggle. The notability policy is generous towards taxa, and there is little danger of a student's work getting removed for lack of notability; this is to be expected when students write biographies. Students may struggle with encyclopedic tone for biographies and stray towards promotional writing, but this is much less common when writing about a shrew or algae! Additionally, we're never going to run out of species to write about. Students have a bounty of stubs and redlinks to pick from. Creating a new article or expanding an existing one also takes a fairly predictable structure, with plenty of articles that students can model after. Don't students just create messes for volunteers to clean up? Our sincere hope is that, no, they don't, and we take several steps to try to minimize the burden on volunteer labor. With automatic plagiarism detection, alerts when students edit a Good or Featured Article, and notifications when students edit an article subject to discretionary sanctions, we try to stay ahead of problems as much as possible. We also review all student work at the end of each term. Ian, Shalor, and I are always happy to receive pings alerting us to student issues that need to be addressed. |
November DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
December 2019 Tree of Life Newsletter
- December 2019—Issue 009
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Apororhynchus by Mattximus |
Cactus wren by CaptainEek |
News at a Glance |
|
Editor Spotlight: Plantdrew |
We're joined this month by long-time editor Plantdrew, who's currently engaged in streamlining the taxonomic structure of Wikipedia articles via the automated taxobox system. How did you become a Wikipedian? What are your particular interests (besides the obvious of "plants")?
What projects are keeping you busy around the 'pedia at present?
What's your favorite plant?
What's your background like? How did you come to have a special interest in biology?
What's something that would surprised TOL editors about your life off-wiki?
Anything else you'd like us to know?
|
December DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Hi, I am going to be making a major change to the List of fugitives from justice who disappeared that will mostly likely be good for it. Can you help me with this? If so I will let you know what help I will need. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Davidgoodheart I don't know much about the subject but I can copyedit if that helps. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 09:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi! Thanks for cleaning up after me. :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 09:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Revision of my edit of Pat Hingle
Hi I am new to adding info to Wikipedia. I see that you removed my edit and stated it was inappropriate. The info that I added is 100% correct. When you use the term inappropriate are you saying that it is because I have put something in the wrong place? I don’t know how to add he info in it’s correct section, and tried for many hours to do so. I added it at the top of the page so hopefully some kind soul would either show me how to do it, or add it for me. I saw no option to assist in doing this. In this sense the use of the word “inappropriate isn’t really the case. Unfortunately the meaning of this word these days implies that there has been some wrong doing on someone’s part. I assume that you do not think that I have done something or behaved in some way inappropriately. Perhaps you can clarify this. Also I have some info to add to the Walter Koenig filmography. I don’t want to make the same mistake again, perhaps you would be good enough to help me. If you do respond to this message, I must confess I don’t know how to look up to see the reply. It is only by chance that I saw that my post had been removed. As I said I am a complete newbie to trying to edit. Please remember that at some point in time it was everyone’s first attempt.
Respectfully
Tramp Bigmal666 (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Sic
I'm sorry for my revert on Maxim Dlugy. Although your initial edit was clear, I didn't see the simple point. Quale (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Quale thank you for your good natured response.
Request for feedback
Given that you've edited the page on collective intelligence, I'm reaching out to request that you provide feedback on the draft of a new page for "General Collective Intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:General_Collective_Intelligence CognitiveMMA (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
A toast sandwich for you!
Thanks for the spell correction on the page I've been watching, Tea in the United Kingdom. ~~ SyrOrange88 (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC) |
Pronomial vs. Pronominal
Hello, I have noticed you "correcting" the spelling of pronomial to pronominal, however the former is not incorrect, they are just two similarly spelled words that mean the same thing. (Although until now I had never heard of the latter word.) I don't see any benefits from these changes. But perhaps you do, so I just wanted to give you the opportunity to explain why pronominal is preferable over pronomial. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi AquitaneHungerForce I am working my way thru the WP lists of misspellings and have reached P which lists pronomial as a misspelling of pronominal. Considering their size the lists have relatively few errors although I have come across a couple. An online search of the OED and Merriam-Webster gives only pronominal with no apparent results for pronomial. My papercopy of the shorter OED has only pronominal. This of course is not necessarily conclusive. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
sorry
Sorry sir I don't know alibaba marjinaa article edit suckpuppet. I very sorry please don't block me please I have a promise next time I not editing suckpuppet please I very very sorry ध्रुविल९०१२ (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello Orenburg1, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
May God shower you with all the goodness in the world. May you be blessed with all that you have dreamt about. Merry Christmas.RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 14:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medicine Hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed.
Suggestions
Hello there! Can I suggest if I can change the sentence of Virgin Atlantic fleet
"Virgin Atlantic operates an all widebody aircraft from Airbus and Boeing, composed of Airbus A330-200, Airbus A330-300, Airbus A350-1000 and Boeing 787-9. The airline also has Airbus A330-900 on order."
Hope you're okay with this. Thanks in advance! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 05:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Cornerstone2.0. The sentence does not make a lot of sense without the word fleet'.
- I originally reverted your previous edit to change aircrafts to aircraft as the singular and plural of aircraft are the same in English, but see that I reverted to a version that was still confusing.
- I suggest that the opening sentence should simply read:
- "Virgin Atlantic operates a fleet of all widebody aircraft from both Airbus and Boeing."
- This makes the opening sentence simple to read and the details of the fleet and its development can then be dealt with in detail in the following sections which probably is easier in the long run as these change relatively frequently. I see that you have done a pretty good job on these sections by the way.
- I have changed the intro accordingly.
- Regards.
- Orenburg1 (talk) 07:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
@Orenburg1:, okay then.. thanks for your response! :)) Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
If you have a moment, could you revert the IP's edit to this article? I can't seem to make them understand that they cannot add unsourced "soon to be published" information to Wikipedia articles, and they just keep restoring it. I've filed an edit warring report. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, I withdrew the AN3 report because I miscounted and I'm over 3 reverts myself. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
@Beyond My Ken:, I did not have internet access yesterday as I was travelling but I see Black Hawk has reverted it. Regards Orenburg1 (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Undo
Ah, sorry I missed that there was a mistake in the title. Terasail[✉️] 15:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC) @Terasail: No probs. Regards. Orenburg1 (talk) 16:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
A Stupid Question?
What does CE mean in the edit summaries? Just brushing up on my abbreviations knowledge is all?!. --Vaati the Wind Demon (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Vaati the Wind Demon: Not so stupid. I am using ce as an abbreviation for copyedit. See WP:CE. Regards. Orenburg1 (talk) 07:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Vaati the Wind Demon: And I really meant to refer to Wikipedia:Edit summary legend#Copy edit. Orenburg1 (talk) 07:39, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thanks for catching the spelling errors
For some reason my browser will not spell check edits to Wikipedia, but will on other sites. *shrug* 174.86.237.161 (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Mafia
Hi my name is Blaze im known as Blazey im a retired mob boss in west virginia i controlled a crime ring inside the schools which led to us stealing over $8000,i would like to share my story with you 2001:5B0:45C8:19D8:8BE:D932:ADF6:C9D0 (talk) 00:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
Thank you to edit Rajpura article! ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC) |
You made me look up chthonian
Thanks for the fixes of "fourty" to "forty" at List of US Navy ships sunk or damaged in action during World War II. I thought you might want to know, since the quotes on your user page are so good (and I thought you might appreciate a pedantic note), that Wikipedia style is to have no quote marks for quotes in boxes. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 17:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @SchreiberBike: Thank you for your kind words.
- I was unaware of the Wikipedia convention regarding quotation marks but I have now corrected this egregious and regrettable error. Regards. Orenburg1 (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- May all your errors be so small and easy to correct! SchreiberBike | ⌨ 21:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 11:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spanish gold Lynx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unknown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)