User talk:Jarry1250/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jarry1250. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Lynx Photonic Networks
14:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Hi Jarry
I've noticed that the "Lynx Photonic Networks" page has been moved from the quick deletion to AFD state.
I've revised all the text to be in my words, and I didn't quite understand why "Lynx built its products around its patented light management technology, to provide cost-effective, [all optical] switching solutions. Since there solution is [all optical] in nature there is no need to replace it when upgrading other elements of the network such as the [XDM]'s, [Transponder]s, and [Optical Amplifiers]" said this is advertisement. This is in my mind purely informational. I've avoided using any superlatives at all.
regarding "Lynx" the company as an interest to the comunity there are in my mind several very important patents that this company created regarding the telecommunication industry. mainly there PLC solid state switch which was later "copied" by companies like JDSU. as well as there later (not yet entered into the site) development of optical modulation of the PLC splitter and using a simple PLC splitter as both configurable splitter and at the same time a low rate communication module.
Look at a patent from the US patent office developed by Ciena (the ~4 largest telecommunication supplier equipment in the world): US Patent - 6,445,843 it shows an Optical switching system with power balancing patent the is partly based on Lynx 8x8 system.
and Lynx patent: Optical switching system with power balancing US Patent - 6,760,504 indicating what I've mentioned in the article regarding an all optical solution.
also from "Northrop Grumman Corporation" US Patent 7,403,712 - Matrix time division multiplex (MTDM) interrogation in there patent see comment regarding Lynx "Optical matrix switches of the electro-optic type have been demonstrated by many researchers, and at least one is commercially available from Lynx Photonic Networks, Inc" See also:
1. US Patent 6,236,775 - Integrated optical switch array 2. US Patent 6,259,834 - Dense tree optical switch network 3. US Patent 6,263,125 - Integrated optical switch array 4. 6,285,809 - Wraparound optical switch matrix 5. 6,430,329 - Integrated optical switch array 6. 6,904,189 - Fast wavelength-selective switch elements and switch matrices 7. 7,224,901 - All-optical packet routing gates and demultiplexing systems 8. 7,254,299 - High-tolerance broadband-optical switch in planar lightwave circuits
So there are Ciena & Northrop Grumman Corporation stating in there US patent specifically Lynx photonic network as the company which has a commercially proven switches (not just lab samples).
I think that the patents of Lynx above and the fact the other major companies like Ciena relay in there patents (no less) on the existence of Lynx as a company which has commercial products is a real indication of interest for users and a should meet the notability.
Also if you look at the patents you'll notice most WSS, ROADM's, TOADM's uses some type or modification of one of Lynx patents. (Just like Ciena did) which should also be an indication.
Another point is the reference issue, what is regarded as a reliable reference?
Jhon —Preceding unsigned comment added by JhonElcot (talk • contribs) 13:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Lynx Photonic Networks
JhonElcot (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Hi Jarry
I've added the patents to the article and another link which is not a press release from lightwave magazie - "http://lw.pennnet.com/display_article/84045/13/ARTCL/none/none/1/Advantages-of-smart-photonic-switches-in-enabling-all-optical-networks/"
Jhon
Diss
Hey! Great work on the history section for the Diss article. Just wondering if you have any references you can throw in there as well as it's currently unreffed? I imagine it was on a list of to-dos so I don't want to whack an automatic unreffed section tag on it just yet. Ta. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding them... Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Your blocking of User:174.132.78.66
Hi. As pointed out on User talk:174.132.78.66, I am a bit concerned that you blocked User:174.132.78.66 without a notification on the user's talk page, though it be an unregistered IP. Think nothing of it now, but please bear that in mind in future blocks. jftsang 22:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
For your help at Arms of Canada. I shall no longer be editing it due to the involvement of User:Miesianiacal and the stress he causes. I look forward to seeing it on the FA list one day, and I hope that you play a part in getting it there. → ROUX ₪ 04:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Need Help
Hi Jarry, How do I delete an image that I uploaded? (I just uploaded Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev14.jpg and there exists already the same image. Pl help. Thanks Thendral (talk) 06:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for restoring it Jarry. Well now I want to add this image (which is from their official website). How do I go about this? Pl help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thendral Muthusami (talk • contribs) 11:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Jarry, have added image description and other info to this File:Sadhguru_Jaggi_Vasudev14.jpg. Please have a look and let me know if I need to provide any other info to keep this? Thendral (talk) 06:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your help Jarry. I sure will ask the foundation to send that email. Thendral (talk) 11:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Jarry, Isha Foundation has sent the mail to [email protected]. So It can be restored now? What is the next step? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thendral Muthusami (talk • contribs) 07:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Jarry, A user called John JJJ is posting unsuitable images to my user talk page. How do I block him? And, how do I report to Wiki? And I m so shocked anyone can upload such images to Wiki. Pl help. Thendral (talk) 08:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- No Jarry, luckily I had set 'watch the page' so I got the alert when he posted it on my User talk - discussion page and so I quickly removed it. You can see the file name here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thendral Muthusami (talk • contribs) 11:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Jarry, A user called John JJJ is posting unsuitable images to my user talk page. How do I block him? And, how do I report to Wiki? And I m so shocked anyone can upload such images to Wiki. Pl help. Thendral (talk) 08:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Jarry, Isha Foundation has sent the mail to [email protected]. So It can be restored now? What is the next step? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thendral Muthusami (talk • contribs) 07:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your help Jarry. I sure will ask the foundation to send that email. Thendral (talk) 11:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Jarry, have added image description and other info to this File:Sadhguru_Jaggi_Vasudev14.jpg. Please have a look and let me know if I need to provide any other info to keep this? Thendral (talk) 06:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
I think you said I should let you know when I've responded on my page. I have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by A1 Aardvark (talk • contribs) 01:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Signing my posts
Uh, not really sure how to do that. Is there a little macro or something? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by A1 Aardvark (talk • contribs) 12:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| For writing out the copyvio at Suzuki XN85 and creeating an excellent stub. Dlohcierekim 19:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC) |
Need access to text of article you deleted...
I need access to the text for Ken Marcus, so that I may resubmit the article in Wikipedia's standards.
Earlier today you declared that the article was a copyright violation with "nothing salvageable"; however, I did put in quite a bit of original research, including adding citations and sections. The quicker I can get hold of the post-deletion article, the quicker the article can get back on the site.
Thanks, Erin sinclair (talk) 03:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your review! I've attempted to address the issues you identified. Sandstein 19:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Up an running :) Jeepday (talk) 11:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Help - Must have been on auto pilot or something
Hi again! Not sure who I else I should direct this question to. I had a rather messy upload session today. (My brain must have frozen temporarily or something.) I now have two files I've uploaded that I'd really like to see deleted. I've marked them with a superseded tag, but I'm not sure if that's how I'm supposed to indicate deletion. Not only were the names wrong, but the images came out off centre. Both problems were my fault and I have posted new, better versions. The two offending files are: Louis Prince of Battenburg Arms.svg and Louis Prince of Battenberg Arms.svg Any help would be much appreciated. :) A1 Aardvark (talk) 12:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for preparing the first file for deletion. However, I think I didn't make myself quite clear. The two files I listed above should both be delted. They have both been superseded by:
- Prince_Louis_of_Battenberg_Arms.svg.
Yes, it took me three tries to get one file uploaded correctly! Sorry about the confusion. Cheers A1 Aardvark (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
to italicize or not
But a bordure wavy is a thing distinct from the phrase bordure wavy, so WP:MOS#Words as words does not apply. —Tamfang (talk) 23:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Foreign blazons
I hope to resume talks at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology/Style guide for foreign blazons by the end of this week. I would like to take this opportunity to welcome you to join in the discussion. Thank you for your past and continued contributions. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 12:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Ficcc
Hi Jarry, further to your recommendation, I have made a draft (on my user page) of the next article we would like to publish. Would you be able to proof read it to make sure it is OK and not biased? This will replace the current Degarelix page. I will also be adding an image and a UIPAC name shortly. Thanks. Ficcc (talk) 09:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
GnRH antagonist
Hi again Jarry, here is another text to proof-read (on my user page). This will replace the current GnRH antagonist page. Thanks. Ficcc (talk) 15:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Mskadu
No special info. Most of the stuff should be deleted, but you're probably right that for the flickr pics 1, 2, 3 and 4 requesting validation per OTRS is better. I'll change their pages. Hekerui (talk) 13:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. Sorry for not saying hi etc. - I totally forgot because after I opened some pictures my old computer started having some weird problems. Again :) Regards Hekerui (talk) 13:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Signpost
I am traveling and have very limited internet access. So, won't be able to put together the tech report for the signpost for this week. If you could do it, that would be a big help. I normally look through the MediaWiki code changes [1], bugzilla (closed/fixed bugs), the wikitech mailing list and other places. --Aude (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion Converted to PROD: Jackobillia
Thanks for that, but I'm confused. There is no substantial content (it's not even a "stub" category of article from what I can see) - that's why I chose the DB-A3 category. I did a google search of "Jackobillia" and there were *2* results returned! No other artist that I can see has a memorabilia page (even Elvis, the Beatles, etc). However, I'm a novice editor, so I'll bow to your experience! Happy editing :D PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 15:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick response. Just out of interest, if an article is PROD, can you still remove items (like the first "reference", which is just a link to a company's website selling Michael Jackson T-Shirts? Or do you just leave it as is? What's the etiquette? PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 15:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have removed the first reference, as that was a link to a company selling t-shirts! I've kept the other in, as it is to a news article linked to the subject. PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 16:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:VPR
I don't think that this is what you were intending to do... Mr.Z-man 19:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Bold text
Regarding the Bold text thing. Do you happen to use the new toolbar by any chance ? Also, what type of browser are you using ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Polo
As a recent significant contributor to the Marco Polo article, I would welcome your views in the discussion, [[2]]. Chzz ► 13:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to provide further input on desysop proposal
As someone who commented either for or against proposals here, I would like to invite you to comment further on the desysop process proposal and suggest amendments before I move the proposal into projectspace for wider scrutiny and a discussion on adoption. The other ideas proposed on the page were rejected, and if you are uninterested in commenting on the desysop proposal I understand of course. Thanks! → ROUX ₪ 04:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jackobillia
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jackobillia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackobillia. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 07:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Technology report
Thanks! You rock.--ragesoss (talk) 23:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I have deleted/undeleted your talkpage
I have removed from the viewable history a recent edit, which was in the manner of a threat to you. If you would like me to unremove it - or would like to review it in another medium - I can do this for you. Please let me know, I will watchlist this page for a couple of days awaiting your response. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Ismael Mathay Sr. High School article
The first part of the above article is a direct copy of the website cited as its source.
I would just delete the sections as a copyvio, but:
- people might think its just because I put forward objections to sections on the page and the layout (both on the Help Desk, and on the article itself - including its talk page)
- the original creator (Palengkero) would probably just undo it, as he has for other changes I made to the page (two merge section suggestions, and a request for citations of notability for the Notable Alumni section)
I would be grateful if you would look at the page and its history. If Palengkerois the copyright holder of the website ([3]) then I can't see a copyright release. If this is the case, should this not be noted somewhere? Where would I find this information?
I have no problem with Prodego (we've had polite conversations through our Talk Pages), but I feel that this article has problems which need to be addressed, and no one will look at it.
To be honest (and as I've told Palengkero), I'm not sure if the School is sufficiently notable to warrant an article in Wikipedia, but that's neither here nor there!
If you tell me that there's no problems, that I'm over-reacting or anything, no worries... I just want to know - and I don't want to look like a vindictive editor, as I'm not.
Sorry to ramble on - but I hope you can help. Regards, PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 12:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message you put on their talk page! I've done a couple of bits and pieces on the article, and I might have a look at it next week when I get a chance (partner and kids permitting!) and see what I can do. Again, thanks PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 15:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Quick note
I am aware of the distinction although I obvuiosly got confused in my haste to try to stop the user's disruptive editing. Personally I feel it's not a particular issue in a case like this - a relatively new user isn't likely to have a grasp of the difference. I also feel that having such a distinction is pointless as both have largely the same effect and using two similar terms is confusing. I feel we should call both block / ban in general (with either term being allowable) and then qualify that for example temporary wikipedia-wide ban, permanent-topic ban, further qualifying by who imposed if neccessary. I accept however that thats not a debate for here. Dpmuk (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for getting back to me. Reading through these again I think you have a point. I think the text from GCE Advanced Level and GCE Advanced Level in the United Kingdom could be merged to produce a good article. We could also merge some of the other A Level related articles since they are relatively short, and as Commonwealth countries, the exams would be based on the UK system anyway. The only one that should probably stand alone as it appears to be different and contains a lot of useful information is the Hong Kong Advanced Level Examination. I'll reinstate the merger proposals so that others can comment on the subject. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
History of the United Kingdom during World War I
Hi History of the United Kingdom during World War I is now rated GA class. WELL DONE --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Is my content appropriate?
- n.b. Regarding Ideawicket
Hello Jarry
Thank you for your message. I still need to learn the ropes on Wikipedia.
Could you please proof read my content and let me know if it is appropriate.
Thank you
Innovator2099 (talk) 10:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
English Poor Laws
I will be on Wikibreak for a week starting tomorrow. If there is anything else that needs doing to English Poor Laws before it can be passed for GA please don't fail it while I'm gone! Francium12 (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
LivingBot unreliable
I just tested whether LivingBot would add a new WP:GA to Wikipedia:Good articles/recent if I did not ensure it was added myself. It seems that the bot is not working properly as it did not add Aces and eights (blackjack).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have no understanding of what you are saying. Should it be able to catch all the articles that are not added manually? Why did it miss this?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have a few things at WP:GAC. I will watch to see if the bot catches them.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
History of the United Kingdom etc
Do we hold our breath ?--Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Armorial achievements
Hi Jarry, Is there a policy on how much of an armorial chievement should be displayed? I have the capacity to create a number of arms (the shields) but am not really skilled enough to create supporters or other materials. If there is a jpg or png file for the entire achievement of any given coat of arms, should I be creating an svg version... even if I can only create the shield? For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto displays the entire achievement. Is it better to have that displayed as it is, or as a copyright free svg? Many thanks! A1 Aardvark (talk) 11:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
As a second point, if a city, for example, has no arms displayed, is it ok to put in their shield? Or should I only display the complete achievement? Cheers A1 Aardvark (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks a lot for moving that page. I had just noticed my mistake, so thanks for doing that for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThsTorturedSoul (talk • contribs) 09:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikivoices
Hello there! Thanks for agreeing to participate in Wikivoices' FAC review episode. This is just a reminder to let you know that the episode starts in about twenty minutes. I am going to be hosting the call, so could you please add 'NuclearWarfare' to your contact list so that I can add you to the discussion? Thanks. I hope to hear you soon. NW (Talk) 18:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
CRGS articles
Hey, it's really good to see the articles about CRGS being treated so well; they're a credit to you and the school. The Shaw Jeffrey article in particular is a real cracker. Keep up the good work! Brammers (talk) 09:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
FA
I didn't realise you were the nominator, having just heard the discussion in which you were a participant. It brings home how anonymous and clinical I often feel when reviewing; I didn't notice your name until I revisited to fix a typo. Tony (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think I have the knowledge to fix the lead; I could try a few sections below. Tony (talk) 11:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank for volunteering to be Wikivoices' guinea pig for our first ever episode on FAC reviewing - it takes courage to sit and listen to a bunch of people critique an article you've worked on in real time! We really appreciate your patience and willingness to participate! Awadewit (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC) |
iPhone app on WP:Signpost
You and Ragesoss were id'ed as the authors for the WP iPhone app item in the latest Signpost. I've been searching on and off for days, and can't find any place where this supposed Open Source code is available from. All download links point to the Apple iTunes store, and that download doesn't appear to include the code. Any idea where it lives? Thanks, RossPatterson (talk) 00:23, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ragesoss answered a similar request, so no need to reply. Thanks, RossPatterson (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
History of the United KIngdom during World War I
Hi Sorry I have been very busy in the outside wiki world and have just been able to dip in and out I have changed some refs from external sites to books and will keep trying to help when able. Seems to be getting a good review and will give us things to work on if we dont make it this time. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Discussion and poll on reviewer usergroup criteria
You may be interested in a discussion and poll I've started to decide the criteria that will be used for promoting users to the reviewer group at Wikipedia talk:Reviewers#New discussion and poll: reviewer criteria - please put your comments there. AndrewRT(Talk) 17:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Have left a reply at Project Heraldry, thanks for yours. Endrick Shellycoat 13:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
LivingBot
Hey Jarry, it seems that LivingBot is out of order again as my most recent WP:GA Pavilion projects was promoted an hour and a half ago with no change in Wikipedia:Good articles/recent. According to the page's history, it was operating quite well until earlier today (yesterday UTC). As I look at its most recent activity, it added Dominant white 11 minutes after it appeared at WP:GA, Apolo Anton Ohno 7 minutes, Max Boot 7 minutes and Sicklefin lemon shark 9 minutes after. An hour and a half seems to suggest a malfunction. Let me know what is going on.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- The bot seems to have gone offline or something for a bit and missed mine and all these. Please let me know what is going on with the bot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- You are suppose to remove the oldest first. I am going to undo what you just did.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Dave Fry
It seems that you have deleted the article Dave Fry after it had clearly been deemed usable. Please explain to me why this is happening for the 8th time. Doctorhobomd (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| For doing your best to hunt me down before I blew up the wiki, and helping me save myself from my own stupidity, I hereby give you the Special Barnstar. Thanks for your help. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC) |
Tagging images
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I signed the petition you linked to. Having been away for the last few weeks I lost track of the discussion concerning the NPM's threat. Do you have a link so I can update myself? Cheers ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nice!
Cool, nice work on my template. I like the way it looks now. Hopefully people will use it on their talk pages. Have a nice day! --A3RO (mailbox) 22:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
I'll get right on that
Thanks very much for the offer. [4] I think nearly all of them are suitable for commons, but I'll check soon and get back to you. I think any that were labeled PD-US were taken in the US and before 1923 (I don't upload those published after 1923, but I suppose I'm allowed to; I'm not sure how any of this relates to Commons restrictions). There is one fair use pic I took at a sculpture garden last September that Commons won't allow, but it's the only pic that comes to mind. And how did you know my first name is "Hugh"? -- Noroton (talk) 04:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- I took a look through the list, and everything seems to be good to upload. I checked the images of the paintings, and all the artists died at least 100 years ago, so I don't think there should be any problem at Commons, and I think PD-US is good for any of these files at Commons. So please go right ahead. Thanks again. -- Noroton (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I looked over the list (twice now) and didn't find one that originated outside the United States. -- Noroton (talk) 19:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Article Deleted - Explanation?
Hi,
A few months ago I contributed a piece on "open innovation intermediaries", which was deleted (apparently by you) on August 2 at 19:06 hours. The reason cited was "G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement (CSDH)". The first version of this piece was scheduled for deletion due to a lack of verifiable sources, and the second version (which included those sources) was deleted due to infringement.
Since speedy deletion was argued, I'd like to know where this infringement was found (and why it was "unsalvageable"), given that I received no notification whatsoever to provide clarification, but just found the page deleted a few weeks later. You can send any comments to my personal email: [email protected] OR indicate how to continue this discussion inside Wikipedia.
Thanks, A.R.
Orangeraven (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Some garbling by LivingBot at WP:GA
See this diff. A couple of problems:
- The new item got inserted after an existing quote mark, not before
- The new item was shown as alphabetized by last name, as it is in the GA list below, but should be shown as the article name.
Thanks. --Uncia (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think either item is critical; they're just untidy. I think if I were making this list, then (since it is advertised as "Recently listed good articles") I would take a hard line and give the article's true name, without any of the beautifying that may be applied in the lists below. --Uncia (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Thumb size preferences
Hi, User:Tony1 suggested I contact you on this. I'm trying to find out how many users have set a preference for these. The excercise was done for date prefs earlier this year - here, by Lightmouse, who seems no longer active. Is this the sort of thing you do, or can you suggest someone? The question often comes up in the endless debates on image issues, but no one has a clue. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
OTRS invitation
Hi Jarry. Could you let us know what the status of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/LivingBot 13 is please? Many thanks, - Kingpin13 (talk) 04:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Increasing the default thumbnail size
Jarry, there seems to be general support for an increase (from 180 to 220px, possibly). I'm asking your advice because you're a computer-savvy user and a member of BAG (and Tim Starling, whom I asked a few days ago, doesn't seem to be around at the moment). Is the best way of going about this to launch an RfC at the Image Use policy talk page, advertising it widely? Are there likely to be technical issues?
Link. Tony (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Done. - Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 16:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- See also the query 3 up here. Johnbod (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, did I not get back to you on that one? I guess not. Apparently, yes, you'll need to go bug a proper dev until they cave into your demands - maybe Andrew (User:Werdna) who I tried pinging on IRC but obviously to no avail. - Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 16:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. Johnbod (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Jarry, I've left notices at Centralized Discussion, VP, and WT:FPC concerning Mick's RfC at the Image Use policy talk page. Tony (talk) 07:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. Johnbod (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, did I not get back to you on that one? I guess not. Apparently, yes, you'll need to go bug a proper dev until they cave into your demands - maybe Andrew (User:Werdna) who I tried pinging on IRC but obviously to no avail. - Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 16:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Your signature
Just a friendly note, I`ve seen a couple of your posts, and you want to add an end bracket for the link to Private Eye (magazine), since now it's Private Eye (magazine, and shows up as a broken link. Happy editing, --Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Fish - ref desk
See your question on the ref desk - the fish may be chromis abyssus, however have you tried Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes ? 83.100.251.196 (talk) 23:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thank you!
Thank you for your help on the technical page! Very helpful! Ikip (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Dashes
I changed the spacing of the dashes simply because I thought it looked better, but if the MOS says no spaces, then no spaces it will be-I didn't realise! Incidentially, I went to St Helena. RASAM (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
RfC on increasing the default size of thumbnails
Hi Jarry: I've alerted Tim Starling to the ongoing RfC, which I hope people might agree to wind up in a few days' time. I mentioned you to him, since you gave a prelim technical opinion at the start. Please let me know if you have any thoughts on the matter; or you might wish to liaise with Tim yourself. Thanks. I think 220px is a no-brainer, but given the solid support for up to 250px, I'd personally be more comfortable with 230px. Tony (talk) 03:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Jarry, still nothing from Tim Starling, who must be trekking in wilderness for a month. I believe there was a WM conference in Argentina recently.
- Mick Stephenson and I are both anxious that we know how things will proceed. The rise from 180 to 220px seems like a no-brainer (even though many would prefer a bigger up-step, myself included). Is Tim the one to do this? Should I ask elsewhere? It would be nice to know when Tim will return. Thanks Tony (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)