User:Sgconlaw/2011-2012 archive

Here are the articles that were created or expanded by students in Semester 1 of the 2011–2012 academic year. (The articles are in the process of being edited and made publicly available on Wikipedia.)

← 2010–2011

2012–2013 →

**Assignment of Articles for the 2011–2012 Academic Year**
Group	Section G2	Section G3
1	Non-constituency Member of Parliament	Constitution of Singapore The section on "Sources of constitutional law".
2	Representative democracy in Singapore	Powers of the President of Singapore The sections about (1) whether the President may speak publicly on controversial matters without Cabinet's approval, and (2) whether the President possesses "soft powers" (and what such "soft powers" might be).
3	Fettering of discretion in Singapore administrative law	Re Fong Thin Choo Focusing on the part of the judgment dealing with the setting aside of a decision by a public authority on the basis of a material error of fact.
4	Doctrine of bias in Singapore law Sections of the article dealing with actual bias and imputed bias.	Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law Section on the law relating to personal and public interest standing (locus standi).
5	Ong Ah Chuan v. Public Prosecutor The section on the part of the judgment dealing with Article 9(1) of the Constitution and fundamental rules of natural justice.	Constitution of Singapore Sections on "Supremacy of the Constitution" and "Amendment" (how the Constitution may be amended).
6	Ong Ah Chuan v. Public Prosecutor The section on the part of the judgment dealing with Article 12(1) of the Constitution.	Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor An article about the High Court's judgment Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor [1994] 3 S.L.R.(R.) 209.
7	Remedies in Singapore constitutional law	Shadrake v. Attorney-General Updates to the draft article prepared by students who took the course in 2010–2011 to take into account the Court of Appeal's judgment in the matter, in particular dealing with the Court's comments on constitutional law.
8	Internal Security Act (Singapore) A section on Part II, Chapter II, of the Act, which deals with detention without trial.	Exclusion of judicial review in Singapore law

Accolades[edit]

On 14 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shadrake v. Attorney-General, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in Shadrake v. Attorney-General, where a British journalist was charged with scandalizing the Singapore courts, the Court of Appeal declined to apply the American "clear and present danger" test? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shadrake v. Attorney-General. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

On 7 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the 1994 case Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor the Singapore High Court held that a ban on Jehovah's Witnesses and their publications did not violate their freedom of religion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

"Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor" was rated a good article on 15 March 2014.

On 11 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ong Ah Chuan v. Public Prosecutor, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in the 1980 case Ong Ah Chuan v. Public Prosecutor, the Privy Council held that fundamental liberties in the Singapore Constitution should be given a "generous interpretation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ong Ah Chuan v. Public Prosecutor. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

On 15 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Non-constituency Member of Parliament, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that former Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew said that the Non-constituency Member of Parliament scheme should be introduced to show younger voters how destructive an opposition can be? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Non-constituency Member of Parliament. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

"Non-constituency Member of Parliament" was rated a good article on 28 April 2014.

On 18 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Representative democracy in Singapore, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Singapore Government believes representative democracy is better understood as focusing on the electorate choosing political parties than individual Members of Parliament (Parliament House pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Representative democracy in Singapore. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

"Representative democracy in Singapore" was rated a good article on 28 March 2014.

On 14 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Constitution of Singapore, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Singapore Constitution that came into force on 9 August 1965 was not drafted as a single document but was made up of provisions from three separate statutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Constitution of Singapore. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

On 19 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Re Fong Thin Choo, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in the 1991 case Re Fong Thin Choo the Singapore High Court held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on a misconception or ignorance of a fact? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Re Fong Thin Choo. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Nyttend (talk · contribs) 16:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

On 23 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fettering of discretion in Singapore administrative law, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in Singapore administrative law, it is illegal for a public authority to fetter its discretion by sticking rigidly to a policy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fettering of discretion in Singapore administrative law. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

"Fettering of discretion in Singapore administrative law" was rated a good article on 24 April 2014.

On 10 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Remedies in Singapore constitutional law, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Singapore High Court (pictured) can grant the remedy of declaring void a law inconsistent with the Constitution enacted before its commencement, even though Article 4 seems to say otherwise? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Remedies in Singapore constitutional law. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

On 11 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Internal Security Act (Singapore), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Chia Thye Poh, formerly detained under Singapore's Internal Security Act, has been called "the world's second longest serving prisoner-of-conscience after South Africa's Nelson Mandela"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Internal Security Act (Singapore). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Allen3 ^talk 00:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

"Internal Security Act (Singapore)" was rated a good article on 28 March 2014.

On 11 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Exclusion of judicial review in Singapore law, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1989 the Singapore Parliament reversed the effect of a 1988 Court of Appeal case holding that the Internal Security Act did not exclude judicial review of decisions to detain without trial? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Exclusion of judicial review in Singapore law. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

"'Exclusion of judicial review in Singapore law" was rated a good article on 23 March 2014.

On 24 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that justiciability is a threshold issue in Singapore administrative law, and the Court of Appeal has held that exercises of prosecutorial discretion and the clemency power are justiciable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — The DYK project (nominate) 00:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

"Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law" was rated a good article on 28 March 2014.

Participants[edit]

**Section G2**
Group 1 Viviansiah (talk · contribs · count) abigail.kor (talk · contribs · count) Jmwee (talk · contribs · count) ageorge.2010 (talk · contribs · count)	Group 5 Malleirej (talk · contribs · count) Mayumisoh (talk · contribs · count) jenniferlee_91 (talk · contribs · count) mr.makwk (talk · contribs · count) Zhengpei (talk · contribs · count)
Group 2 lonjizeno (talk · contribs · count) ginang.101 (talk · contribs · count) jiamin.tan.2010 (talk · contribs · count) hilda.foo (talk · contribs · count) tinofee (talk · contribs · count)	Group 6 pineappletart (talk · contribs · count) feliciatwm (talk · contribs · count) Zihui.lau (talk · contribs · count) Tohjiawen (talk · contribs · count)
Group 3 Ernestkohel (talk · contribs · count) Adachua (talk · contribs · count) Andrealim2010 (talk · contribs · count) Seanlwh1 (talk · contribs · count) Sirajshaik1988 (talk · contribs · count)	Group 7 Leewingkansally (talk · contribs · count) jiahui.tan (talk · contribs · count) Yuklun (talk · contribs · count)
Group 4 T.qiaolin (talk · contribs · count)	Group 8 ClaytonChong (talk · contribs · count) Jiaxinho (talk · contribs · count) Lea Woon Yee (talk · contribs · count) Huanghuien (talk · contribs · count) Iamgeraldsoo (talk · contribs · count)

**Section G3**
Group 1 Geraldthamky (talk · contribs · count) zhihao.loy (talk · contribs · count) jasminelim.sh (talk · contribs · count) lord terentius (talk · contribs · count)	Group 5 jonchua.sm (talk · contribs · count) benjaminloh.2010 (talk · contribs · count) Chin Wan Yew Rachel (talk · contribs · count) Charissahan (talk · contribs · count)
Group 2 deschew (talk · contribs · count) Ngweilong (talk · contribs · count) niklaswong (talk · contribs · count) jenisse.lau (talk · contribs · count) yeoeileen (talk · contribs · count)	Group 6 Joshuatanxr (talk · contribs · count) Ly.choo.2009 (talk · contribs · count) Watermelonfarmer89 (talk · contribs · count) Marghuangmz (talk · contribs · count) Lowshjasmine (talk · contribs · count)
Group 3 zzeggy (talk · contribs · count) KONGzhenning (talk · contribs · count) Kaden-ghz (talk · contribs · count)	Group 7 Rachloke (talk · contribs · count) Chuajz (talk · contribs · count) Deyasd (talk · contribs · count) Disciple89 (talk · contribs · count)
Group 4 rachel.lam.2010 (talk · contribs · count) constiKid4 (talk · contribs · count) priscillasoh (talk · contribs · count) Kia Hua (talk · contribs · count) twicethetastezerocalories (talk · contribs · count)	Group 8 Adnaan.noor (talk · contribs · count) Huimin.law.2010 (talk · contribs · count) linus.koh.2010 (talk · contribs · count) yisiong.sui (talk · contribs · count)