User:Barek/tools
External link tools External link discussions
Whois lookups
IP subnet ranges
Help desk and issue reporting
Other tools
Coding and formatting help
My user content Other projects Other resources
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
ReportsUser-reported
The page is now updated at User:Cyberbot I/Requests for unblock report. Please change links accordingly. You can still see the table below.
This table is updated as often as every 15 minutes. Last updated 23 minutes ago.
Current requests for increase in protection levelRequest protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite pending changes: persistent ip sockpuppetry on this and other similar articles. Yuthoob (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit war over a photo, no real discussion. The Banner talk 16:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolls and vandals messing with Axl. Downzyisaliar (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Reason: New page that falls under WP:CT/A-I; should be extended-confirmed protected. Reconrabbit 17:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Extend protection preferably until after the second round on 8 December. Borgenland (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same editing patterns as before, i.e. text starting "Two new Gladiators..." latest edit [2] as well as adding two random names to the section of the upcoming series. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs adding FANCRUFT in violation of TVCAST and edit warring. CNMall41 (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Recent article about the Israeli-Arab conflict. Wiiformii (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I am requesting page protection for the disputed section on Rukmini's age during marriage. A translation of the Skanda Purana claims she was 8 years old at the time of her marriage to Krishna, but this is contradicted by multiple other sources, including the Bhagavata Purana, Harivamsa and Brahmavaivarta Purana, which describe her as a woman who had attained puberty. This discrepancy has led to repeated edit wars, with conflicting revisions disrupting neutrality and confusing readers. To preserve the article’s integrity, I request semi-protection or extended-confirmed protection for the section, enabling experienced editors to collaboratively address the issue and reach a consensus on the talk page in line with Wikipedia’s principles of verifiability and neutrality. Tantrasurge (talk) 22:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism by 107.9.6.210. Greatbrookcondor (talk) 00:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection levelRequest unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here. Current requests for edits to a protected pageRequest a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings: "She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]" 1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests. Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[3] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording. 2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
This appears to have been dealt with? Selfstudier (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC) Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
This one, too? Selfstudier (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC) The 70% figure in both the primary and the secondary source refers to the deaths that were verified by the UN Human Rights Office, not the totality of deaths in Gaza. Accordingly, the current phrasing "70% of Palestinian deaths in Gaza are women and children" is inaccurate and should be changed to "70% of the 8,119 verified deaths were women and children" Zlmark (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Nothing needs to be done here, the article is clear enough.Selfstudier (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC) in the content, higehst grossing franchises, rank 4 (Cop Universe), in that one, the movie Singham Returns (2014) is highlighted in green which indicates it is a recent movie, but actually the movie Singham Again (2024) should be highlighted in green because unlike Singham Returns, it is a recent movie, it has wrongly been marked, kindly correct it. Thanks :) Zev the Editor (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC) I would like to request the addition of the following paragraph on Singapore’s support for a two-state solution under the section "International Positions on the Two-State Solution" in the Two-state solution article: International Positions on the Two-State Solution Singapore: Singapore supports a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocating for a negotiated outcome aligned with relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions. According to Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore believes this approach allows Israelis and Palestinians to coexist peacefully and securely, considering it the only viable path toward a comprehensive, just, and lasting resolution. Singapore also consistently upholds the Palestinian right to a homeland. The PLO, which constitutes the key pillar of the current Palestinian Authority, accepts Israel's right to exist and has renounced terrorism.[1] EsenL (talk) 02:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
References
Gaza genocide - the 186,000 indirect deaths estimateIn the "Indirect" section, the following sentence should be added after "186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza": Three days after the publication, one of the writers, Professor Martin McKee, clarified that the 186,000 figure was “purely illustrative”[1] and stated that “our piece has been greatly misquoted and misinterpreted.”[2] References
Zlmark (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC) I would like to request that a change be made for accuracy under the subhead Origin and spread: Other events. There is a reference to a photo of a man carrying two dead geese, but it is actually only one goose. Footnotes 54, 58, and 59 all state that there is one goose in the photo. Footnote 60 says two geese, but this is evidently a mistake on TMZ's part as the photo itself clearly shows only one goose. I suggest that the wording "man carrying two dead Canada geese" be changed to "man carrying a dead Canada goose". In the next sentence I suggest that the wording "The geese were roadkill" either be changed to "The goose was roadkill" or that this part of the sentence be eliminated since the only source for the goose being roadkill is the TMZ article which may be unreliable and perhaps should be removed as a reference? It's possible the official quoted by TMZ was referring to a different incident altogether involving two roadkill geese and TMZ mistakenly linked this to the Columbus photo. Then I suggest in the following sentence the wording "stealing geese" be changed to "stealing a goose". Also, I would like to suggest that the semi-protected status be lifted from the Talk page of this article. 2600:100A:B10A:4AA1:0:21:7E13:E301 (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I suggest changing the map on the states agreeing with with the Genocide charge (green coloured) to include Spain and Ireland, as these declared to join South Africa's case in the ICJ and generally agree with the allegations in public statements. Ireland also passed a motion in the parliament declaring it a genocide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9e8:9a4:6900:50f:51e:c5cd:b7cf (talk • contribs) 15:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC) In the state results table, I would like to request that the columns labeled Margin and Margin swing be filled in, for those rows/states in which the relevant data has already been entered. Obviously not every state has data, but most do. This should be trivial, at least for Margin, but the inability to sort by margin has been annoying me for a week now. LoganStokols (talk) 19:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Hello, In this article, the following section is problematic. "On 9 or 10 October, Hamas offered to release all civilian hostages held in Gaza if Israel would call off its planned invasion of the Gaza Strip, but the Israeli government rejected the offer.[242]" It needs to be taken out completely. The original article is based on an interview in Times of Israel newspaper. In the interview, the interviewee mentions this as a side comment: “We later found out that Hamas had offered on October 9 or 10 to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the IDF not entering the Strip, but the government rejected the offer.” There is no mention of how they found out, and this is pretty much the only "evidence" given in support of any offer from Hamas to release all civilian hostages. It is less than hearsay. Thank you for listening. Ioana IoanaBlandiana (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC) Add US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to Parties list Add US Marshal Service to Parties list Add Arlington County Police to Parties list Add US Park Police to Parties List Nhryan122 (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC) Change 'Trump achieved a decisive victory in the electoral college' to 'Trump won the electoral college.' I know reliable sources are using the word "decisive," but it feels a little too editorializing for the tone of Wikipedia. 2600:1700:46B0:D50:3074:103:DAF0:F89F (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC) The VP section should now have "succeeding - JD Vance (elect) Enochz7 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC) His 'president' section should have "succeeded by - Donald J Trump (elect) Enochz7 (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC) I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . 213.105.169.79 (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
2024 United States Presidential election Kamala Harris’ vote total in Virginia is incorrect by 100,000 extra votes. Handled requestsA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Subcategories
Dated deletion categoriesBacklogs larger than 10 days will not appear below due to limitations in the template. Please clear older backlogs before newer ones and check the "master category" once in a while if a category suddenly changes from "huge backlog" to "no backlog" overnight. Although not technically part of the speedy deletion criteria, articles which have been proposed for deletion for more than seven days are also listed here as a matter of convenience.
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 1 item Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Pages detected by the edit filterThe edit filter can detect certain pages that may meet criteria for speedy deletion and tag those edits in recent changes:
Special pages
|
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Barek/tools. |