Template talk:Argentine government

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconArgentina Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Argentine government, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Chief of the Cabinet of Ministers[edit]

I think that this office should be listed apart from the other ministers. Do you agree with that? --IANVS (talk) 06:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be correct due the others report to him --Jor70 (talk) 09:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, would be nice to have the Argentine Congress and Justice branches too --Jor70 (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Navigational templates shouldn't be overpopulated. There is already a "natural" line dividing topics and we should use it: a template for the executive power (this one), another one for the legislative (yet to be created), and another one for the judicial, {{Argentine Supreme Court}} (which may be expanded if needed). By the way, those should be oriented towards the current authorities of each power: for a navigational template gathering all the main aspects of argentine government in a permanent and conceptual form, we have the vertical {{Politics of Argentina}}. MBelgrano (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are right! --Jor70 (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]