Template:Did you know nominations/Sabine Marcelis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 00:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Sabine Marcelis

Moved to mainspace by MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk). Nominated by Cl3phact0 (talk) at 05:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Sabine Marcelis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Hi Cl3phact0 (talk), article moved to main space on 17 February and exceeds minimum length; sources used look to be reliable for the subject matter cited; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing from a quick look at sources and Earwig is fine; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, the Architectural Digest Middle East source was dead for me (and the AFR subscription only) but I rescued the link from Internet Archive and it supports the hook (it's an interview with the subject but comes under WP:ABOUTSELF; you look to be exempt from the QPQ requirement. One minor issue, there are two missing citations in the article which I've tagged, are you able to look at these? Thanks - Dumelow (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dumelow, thank you for your help. Re: AFR: added that one this morning when I noticed the problem with the AD piece. As I didn't originate the article or place the original reference, I wasn't comfortable just removing it. Thanks for finding the archive version. Also, for info: I'm not a subscriber but am able to see behind the AFR paywall (if that's of any interest). Otherwise, the two missing citations that you've marked should be easy (fairly sure I read something about both of these statements in the material that's already used herein). Might not get to it before tomorrow or Sunday morning at this point. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Cl3phact0, no worries. Give me a ping when you've added those cites - Dumelow (talk) 09:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
@Dumelow:  Done (Plus a few additional odds and sods.) -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Cl3phact0, looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)