Template:Did you know nominations/CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Referencing

CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc. it was reaffirmed that processes a human mind can easily perform cannot be patented?

Created/expanded by Y.ishihara (talk). Nominated by Plauph (talk) at 06:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

• New enough and long enough at the time of nomination. Hook is properly formatted. Image has acceptable copyright. Article is neutral enough.
• Article is not fully supported by inline citations. Hooked fact is not supported by inline citations.

Fully cite article. --LauraHale (talk) 21:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

• Not fully cited. The decision, although cited implicitly, should still be marked with footnotes. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)