Template:Did you know nominations/Alicja Iwańska
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Alicja Iwańska
- ... that Polish resistance member Alicja Iwańska became an academic and compared political, religious, and racial persecution in Europe to United States segregation restrictions?Source: "zaangażowani już w konspirację AK" [involved already in the Home Army underground] and "u podstaw programu seminarium, jakie zaproponowała studentom z Atlanty, pt. „Katastrofy społeczne”, na którym przedstawiała takie zagadnienia, jak niemieckie kacety, rosyjskie łagry, prześladowania polityczne, religijne i rasowe w XX wieku, a wszystko na tle rasizmu na Południu USA" [...at the heart of the seminar program she presented to Atlanta (University) students, "Social Disasters", in which she presented issues such as German hangouts, Russian gulags, political, religious and racial persecution in the 20th century, all against the backdrop of racism in the South of the USA.[1]
- ALT1:... that Polish resistance member Alicja Iwańska′s most influential academic work in the United States focused on the Mazahua people of Mexico? Source: (resistance member same as above) "Meksykańskim Indianom poświęciła kilka lat pracy naukowej, najważniejsze publikacje" She devoted several years of scientific work to Mexican Indians, her most important publications and "She conducted fieldwork...among Mazahua Indians in Mexico".[2]
Improved to Good Article status by SusunW (talk), Piotrus (talk), and Ipigott (talk). Nominated by SusunW (talk) at 16:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC).
Article is long (1500+ characters), recent (promoted to GA on September 8 and nominated on September 12), well sourced, hooks are verifiable, no copyvio detected, article looks good and well done. Both hooks are acceptable, I prefer the original hook. QPQ review is done. Just some notes to nominator User:SusunW, citation templates are missing the |url-status=live parameter. Also some non-English sources can use a Google translate template (I doubt this is a requirement though), I added the template to one source in this edit. Bammesk (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Bammesk Sorry, I have no earthly idea what you are talking about. Sounds like coding?, of which I profess total ignorance. This is my 36th GA and no one has ever made a requirement for a translate template or status of a url. It is not part of the MOS, unless there has been a recent change requiring this. I'm truly sorry, but have no idea what you want me to do. SusunW (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination is good to go without the suggestions. User:SusunW I added the url-status=live parameter to one of the citation templates in this edit. With it included, the reference-title links to the actual source url (or source website), rather than the archive url (or archive website). There are some details here: Template:Cite_web#url. I think you are right, in that neither google translate template nor url-status=live are requirements, but they are helpful when readers access external source links. Bammesk (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Bammesk Sorry, I have no earthly idea what you are talking about. Sounds like coding?, of which I profess total ignorance. This is my 36th GA and no one has ever made a requirement for a translate template or status of a url. It is not part of the MOS, unless there has been a recent change requiring this. I'm truly sorry, but have no idea what you want me to do. SusunW (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
