Talk:XNXX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the XNXX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

endorse delete but allow a draft, 8 January 2020, see Deletion Review.
delete, 20 October 2019 (UTC), see discussion.
speedy delete, 26 October 2016 (UTC), see discussion.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Wondering why this article is trending.[edit]

Just seems odd as nothing seems noteworthy at current. 204.62.51.221 (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because it was recently created from a redirect, so the views have jumped a lot in the past few days. Where was it trending? The Midnite Wolf (talk) 02:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5 Top Read article on English Wikipedia yesterday. Aug | Augiegeier11 (talk) 11:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Augiegeier11

It's November 29th, 2023 and I was wondering the same thing because it has been in the top 5 most read articles every day that I've checked the Mobile app homepage for the last week or two. I'm guessing it might be a troll attempt to make a sexually explicit website appear on the front page of Wikipedia, perhaps with the intended purpose to be for the curious to Google "XNXX" since the adult nature of the site might not be obvious to some. Another thought is that people may be searching a search engine for "XNXX" and be subject to search engine filters and/or an Internet firewall that blocks access to the site itself, so Wikipedia's article is likely the first "SFW" search result. TheCrimsonLegacy (talk) 23:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have been wondering the exact same thing, can't seem to find any reason Tockah (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not start page 94.59.138.227 (talk) 20:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

XNXX[edit]

This article does not qualifies as a truly Trending Article. It is a Stub. Talk entries are few and far between. It is basically a freebie advertising venue for the website. Wikipedia is a well-run very informative website with majority of articles and content of encyclopedic value. It is not an advertising site. I support removing this article, at least from the Trending format. DonnaW2007 (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trending articles are based on how many people are reading them, not the quality of the article.

If you'd like to see the article removed, you can nominate it at Articles for Deletion. I doubt the nomination will succeed, though; while it's short, it is a well-sourced and relatively well-written article about a clearly notable topic. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]