Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Pornography and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

WT:P*
WT:PORNO

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: 7 days

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

Pornography NA‑class

	Erotica and pornography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Daily pageviews of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Notability criteria for actor/actress porn[edit]

[1][2][3] Appealing to WP:NOTABILITY, these three biographies taken as an example which are in all the major encyclopedias Wiki linguistically edition except here, give me food for thought on the fact that biographies relating to porn have too severe cancellation problems. These three biography are widely relevant and important and notable. This makes me understand that a discussion is needed to unequivocally define whoever has been nominated for AVN Awards (who was universally definitely the "Oscar of Porn"), XBIZ (like as "Golden Globe of Porn") or XRCO, as notable and relevant and can have a page on this wiki. They have reached the highest level of notability in their reference sector. Therefore it must be written clearly that whoever is a candidate for these events is unequivocally notable for a pagine in Wikipedia. 5.91.118.61 (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The different language Wikipedia projects each have their own notability guidelines for inclusion. English Wikipedia generally requires non-trivial coverage by independent WP:RELIABLE sources. None of the three performers cited above appear to have such coverage to establish notability, and two of them have been deleted from English Wikipedia. Looking at the es.Wikipedia entries, the references are the typical porn interviews and film database citations, nothing reliable. "The Oscars of Porn" is a promotional tag line with little value in English Wikipedia without support from independent reliable media. Editors found by consensus in 2019, that winning a porn award is not a reliable indicator of notability, absent reliable sources. In particular, AVN nominations, with 15 nominees per category, are a joke even within the industry. Something for everyone, or at least a nomination for every studio. Porn award nominations were deprecated from notability guidelines ten years ago. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worthy making an article?[edit]

Is it worth making Rocky Emerson and Brittney Kade as articles? Dwanyewest (talk) 05:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main deciding factor is available independent WP:RS coverage. I'm finding one GNews hit for Rocky Emerson in Marca, more needed. As for Brittney Kade, coverage consists of low-grade tabloids like the Daily Star and the Mirror. If you can point to better RS coverage, please share it. • Gene93k (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am suggesting a new section for the LiveJasmin page[edit]

I am seeking guidance on the appropriateness and any suggestions for improvement/editing on the following proposed section: Talk:LiveJasmin#Latest_proposed_"Controversy"_section_after_a_number_of_suggestions Alexfotios (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review needed[edit]

Its been 45 days after the adjustment correction of the draft article Draft:Ebony Goddess Mystique. Meligirl5 (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors#Requested move 20 March 2024[edit]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors#Requested move 20 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]