Talk:Ubisoft Film & Television

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theme park[edit]

[[1]] Ubisoft Motion Pictures is making a next generation theme park.(Crazybob2014 (talk) 21:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

movie news on rabbids[edit]

i found this in the star online. [2] (Crazybob2014 (talk) 20:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

history information.[edit]

we need to send someone to gather some history of UMP. Crazybob2014 (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki.[edit]

I made a wikia on this article. But i need help with it. [3] (Crazybob2014 (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. The page history of the one created as a cut & paste is preserved behind the redirect at Ubisoft Motion Pictures. Number 57 18:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Ubisoft Motion PicturesUbisoft Film & Television – Entity was apparently renamed but the new article was created in a cut/paste move, wherefore it needs a histmerge. IceWelder [] 07:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @IceWelder, Mogwai71, WaltDisneyPixarFan, and TuxbietheFixer: Ubisoft Film & Television and Ubisoft Motion Pictures are WP:Parallel histories :: best text-merge them under the name Ubisoft Motion Pictures Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Instead do the text merge as suggested by Anthony Appleyard above. Andrewa (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The text-merge route should probably be taken, but so that the content of "Ubisoft Film & Television" is inserted here, and then this-here article moved to the new name, preserving the elder's history while respecting the company's renaming. @Anthony Appleyard: Consider speedy-closing this discussion (it had been stale for eight days anyway) and performing the merge (or task me to do the merge). IceWelder [] 18:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Admin comment @Anthony Appleyard and Andrewa: I am considering closing this request. Do you have any objections to the text of Ubisoft Film & Television being merged here, then the article moved to the new title? Cheers, Number 57 13:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am puzzled at this proposal. If the articles are to be merged there is no need to move this one. It is far simpler to merge to the proposed title, preserving both histories as is required by our copyleft license. This end result can be achieved by either means, but what you propose is far trickier and much more work to perform, and there seems no advantage to it. Best of luck either way. Andrewa (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Andrewa and Number 57: OK. Close this discussion and make the text-merge as suggested above. Put a history information section in its talk page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Perfectly acceptable. It still seems pointless to me to perform any move, but it's the end result that matters. Andrewa (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.