Talk:The Slab Boys Trilogy

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City: Theatre Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City/Theatre (assessed as Low-importance).

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glossary?![edit]

Can anyone justify including this info? Please see WP:NOT, especially that it's not "A complete exposition of all possible details," not a "Textbooks and annotated texts," and not "an indiscriminate collection of information." Compare a far more famous example, Nadsat, from A Clockwork Orange, neither of which contain a large vocabulary list like this. This article doesn't assert any particular source for these words, nor any critical scholarship commenting on why the use of unusual terms is special. I think this whole section should be deleted, but I'll wait and see if anyone has any reasons supporting its inclusion. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]