Talk:Sutherland Springs church shooting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information on non-reporting[edit]

It's known that the suspect was in the Air Force and yet the article says the Navy didn't report the suspects violent information for background checks. The Navy has nothing to do with the reporting of the violations this suspect had while in the Air Force. 47.185.77.48 (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a fair point. I've fixed it now. While consultation on a talk page is no bad thing, you are welcome to go ahead and fix obvious mistakes like that yourself in future, if you want. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anti religious motivation[edit]

Whoever user(s) keep trying to emphasize his motivation as being anti religious. Please stop it. The sources are not that strong, it's only speculation. We'll never know, he his dead and the evidence is circumstantial ie. the circumstances were that he shot people who were in a church and made a few comments online. The official motivation is a domestic dispute, and this needs to be maintained as the primary motive, for that reason. Everything else is just opinion/speculation. Feel free to discuss here, but stop editing the article until there is consensus to change. -- GreenC 14:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "motive" field of the infobox in mass shooting articles is traditionally a bit of a disaster area. It should contain only uncontroversial statements by the investigators, not speculation by journalists, blogs, YouTube videos, what John Doe thought etc, etc.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]