Talk:Staten Island Academy

This article was nominated for deletion on 18/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kelsmcloughlin. Peer reviewers: Chu Chu China.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No sources, clear advertisement[edit]

This article should be either seriously cleaned or deleted. The whole article is more of a marketing essay written by the school's faculty. Any criticism or objective opinions I have seen on this page have been deleted within a week - of course by the school's faculty. Moreover, the school bans its students from using Wikipedia!

You sound like a facist Wikipedian dictator.24.136.105.18 (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This article cites no sources and is biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.32.119 (talk) 21:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-They don't ban us from using Wikipedia. They just say that we shouldn't use it because it is often inaccurate, which almost everyone says about Wikipedia. Everyone says it because IT IS TRUE! Factual information is found in tangible encyclopedias and books (I do not consider "everyone knows the rockies are bad" to be factual information) 74.73.215.143 00:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was once a version of this page that editors have been constantly deleting when it has been reverted that is much closer to the truth than the page written by the faculty —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.136.207 (talk) 01:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know it was written by the faculty????

74.68.3.93 20:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMG the part about Diane Hulse was so true!! *hugs whoever wrote that* okay, seriously now, if this article is supposed to be neutral and accurate, then I hate to say it *cries* that part should either be deleted... or specific examples given *spider speeches* Oh and someone should write about the school denies students freedom of speech (does not know how to stamp DX)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.95.46  (talk) 01:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]