Talk:Richmond Hill, Queens

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richmond Hill, Queens article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Description of Battle of Long Island/Brooklyn is just plain wrong.

Also the paragraph describing the white flight is incredibly racist, paternalistic, and patronizing. I vandalized it to prove a point.

Landmarks[edit]

Are the landmarks listed really significant? RJFJR (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tag[edit]

The article is readable and relatively well organized. Nice work to those who have cleaned it up; I'll remove the cleanup tag. --Reuben (talk) 03:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to see lots of sikhs, punjabis, go to toronto —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.221.67.75 (talk) 02:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "Guyanian Indians", you must also assert that part of those "Indians" are of identifiable African decent, as the country itself is bi-racial on the point. It is widely known that "Wiki" editiors are some of the most racist, and all-but doctrinaire white supremacists, and therefore color their "facts" with their own prejudices, which explains many things. --65.88.88.253 (talk) 19:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Veryverser — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.253 (talk)