Talk:Pretty Village, Pretty Flame

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

-It's october 8th 2006. I just read the article and fixed a few grammatical errors. -Zlatko

Shouldn't "muslimes" be changed to "bosniaks"? -Betel

In what way is the term bosnian muslim which is considered antiquated and, in certain situations, very offensive due to its implied religious identification, "appropraite to the period of the film"? Usually wikipedia articles refer to "Bosnian Muslims" as Bosniaks even if the individual lived while the antiquated term stil was in use. Please see Bosniak. My change was reverted without any discussion or given argument. -Betel

If "Bosniaks" is used to refer to Muslims by nationality, that is incorrect. It would be ridiculous to call the characters in the film Bosniaks when they are ethnic Muslims. The film names them as such and was made when the collective name transfer was still unclear/incomplete. There are still people today who self-identify as Muslims by nationality, so the term is not inherently offensive anyway. I don't see how using the term (which was used by the people in question themselves until 15 years ago) in a historical context can possibly offensive. To not use it would be misleading and inaccurate. --estavisti 23:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a bosniak myself I really do not care if people call me Bosniak or Muslim. I am proud of my ethnicity and neither would be insulting. One should be proud of his or her ethnicity and religion. Thanks, Vseferović 19:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Wasn't that truck driver from Sweden? --212.247.27.181 14:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. "Kako je kod vas u Svedskoj? Hladno, a? Ali standard, jebi ga."--80.133.209.130 (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
aaaa sigurno kakva standard bre ... Fishing Publication (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Does anyone know much about the music in the movie? --212.247.27.49 15:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe 16 years too late ?
Well , the first song he plays on the harmonica is the Internationale, the song the guy in the hospital sings ko to kaze, ko to laze, Srbija je mala who said, who lied, that Serbia is small -- a Serbian patriotic song from the Great War, if there are more I'll get back to you Fishing Publication (talk) 18:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Wasn't Laza Veljuskas brother-in-law? --212.247.27.49 22:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I remember, he was his godfather or best man.--80.133.209.130 (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


What is it Brzi says when Velja shoots himself? It sounds something like: "kkk ah kako sime sajbu ah kkk aaah majku ti jebem salf

aahahaha kako sime sajvu majkut helem zalisku" --212.247.27.17 00:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he probably said: "Ah kako si me zajeb'o, majku ti jebem". Translate yourself.--80.133.209.130 (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The language from this film has nothing with Croats and Croat language.
Don't mess Croats with this. Kubura 07:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No way, it's not Croat language. Croats wouldn't even use such bad language. They are civilized people!--80.133.209.130 (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And Serbs are more civilized people .. the Serbian court invented the fork while the Kraut ate with his hands Fishing Publication (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding the category Category:Serbo-Croatian-language films[edit]

As per latest removal of category, I understand that the latest coment is related to this. The category says Serbo-Croatian language not Croatian, so I returned it. --Biblbroks's talk 00:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg[edit]

Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Denial[edit]

This article should also point out the fact that this movie is part of what prevents the Serbs and the people of Serbia to understand that Serbian Politics and Militants are were the main aggressors and instigators of the war. It is just another way that keeps Serbia from accepting it's crimes. This is a another pathetic, propagandic attempt for Serbs to rationalize the war as "all sides were aggressors and equally guilty"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.242.107 (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This movie is based on actual events.

I know about the so called based on the true event and its nothing like in this movie. Like my friend sinebot said Serb propaganda and not accepting their crimes

The thing is...I was there and you were not. This movie has nothing to do with who started the war and even less with who was right in it and who was not. And as a matter of fact I think that it showed all the sides in bad light. What Serbs have to understand is that Milosevic IS the man responsible for a big part of what happened during the 90's war and what Croatians have to remind themselves is how much suffering they brought onto the Serbian population in the Second World War, and that emotions from then were never overcome.

P.S I corrected your typo of Moovie to Movie.

Answer: This movie should not be considered as Serbian denial of war crimes. The fact that all the Serbs involved in war are now answering for their deeds or misdeeds in the international court in Hague, points in the opposite direction. Putting that this film is Serbian denial of war crimes will only spread hatred. Moreover, at that time Serbia was part of Yugoslavia, and Milosevic was president of Yugoslavia, so this movie has nothing to do with Serbia today, just as Third Reich has nothing to do with Germany today. For the sake of keeping wikipedia objective encyclopedia, please do not refer to your national emotions nor feeling of loss in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.101.185.65 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


How many more scenes of Serbian soldiers burning villages, looting, ethnic cleansing; how many additional scenes of Serbian militarism in Belgrade, mocking peace advocates would this movies need in order for it to be "not one sided? The vast majority of crimes depicted in this movie were done by Serbs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.22.184 (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title Translation[edit]

The Serbian language can be written in cyrillic or latin script. Instead of the translation categorization of "Serbian: Лепа села лепо горе", it would be more correct to categorize as simply "Serbian: Лепа села лепо горе, Lepa Sela Lepo Gore", as is the case for many other Serbian film title translations on WIkipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.70.130 (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg[edit]

Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pretty Village, Pretty Flame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Corrected formatting/usage for //www.oscars.org/pressreleases/96.11.13.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pretty Village, Pretty Flame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pretty_Village,_Pretty_Flame&oldid=1202150224"