Talk:Paz de la Huerta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good source for expansion[edit]

Lengthy article here: Bulger, Jay (May 30, 2010), Why 'Boardwalk Empire' Actress Paz de la Huerta Will Be Impossible to Ignore This Year, New York {{citation}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help). postdlf (talk) 05:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last name[edit]

Is Paz's last name uses Spanish or American naming standard? Please, resolve this issue. Thanks! 203.215.121.19 (talk) 13:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Paz de la Huerta[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Paz de la Huerta's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "mojo":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 07:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paz de la Huerta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?[edit]

Most of the second paragraph under "personal Life" looks to be word-for-word from the cited Daily Mail article. Also, is the cited thing called "Horn Face" anywhere near a reliable souce? --NoApostropheInIts (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the Horn Face citation. Clearly not RS. I've updated to an article from The Hollywood Reporter. — Satori Son 17:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Career section[edit]

While it makes perfect sense to mention the notable film and TV roles of de la Huerta in this section, quite a lot of the content seems more about the films and TV programs themselves than it is about her, and as such seems much more appropriate for the articles about the films and TV programs. For example, the content about her playing Lucy Danziger does not need to refer to how well acclaimed the show was or how many episodes aired in such detail since that is stuff you'd expect to find in the article Boardwalk Empire. Only content directly related to de la Heurta's appearance in the show is relevant. The same could be said for the content about the film Enter the Void; only the first two sentence of the first paragraph really have anything to do with de la Heurta; the rest is about the film itself and is not needed. There are more examples of this type of thing throughout the section, much of which either needs to be trimmed down quite a bit or removed altogether.

It might also be a good idea to further divide the section up into subsections, either by time period or by type of medium; for example, it could be divided up into "Film" and "Television" subsections, etc. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia community. I would like to second the points brought up by Marchjuly back in 2018. Nothing seems to have been done about this. Why is that? There are multiple sentences in the carreer section that I would like to propose for deletion. What is the procedure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VickiAnderson (talkcontribs) 09:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Ignacio de la Huerta y Ozores, 14th Duke of Mandas[edit]

It says her father was 16th Duke. That is incorrect. Rustygecko (talk) 00:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Her name[edit]

Her name on the Spanish document isn't the one that is being claimed. Someone seems to have added a lot of names to it. Rustygecko (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]