Talk:Ophelia (painting)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ophelia (painting) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dubious[edit]

You don't get fever from a cold bath. --Abdull 10:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Says who? First, we are talking about Victorian models of what caused disease here, and that's all the source we have. She was supposed to have caught a "chill" (i.e. become feverish). Fever is a symptom, not a specific condition. Secondly, the sentence says she caught it "while modelling in a cold bath for the painting". It does not say that the bath caused the fever. That way, the Victorians sources for this story are respected, along with their assumptions about the causal relationship between events, without stating that the fever was directly caused by the cold. Paul B 10:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of citation templates[edit]

Hi, Ceoil, thanks for working on "Ophelia (painting)". I wonder, though, why you have removed all the citation templates such as {{cite book}} and {{cite web}}? I think they help to ensure a consistent citation format. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 12:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jack, I dislike thoes templates as they add a lot of unnessary html, are difficult to manage, and because handcoding is so much easier (no need for cuting, pasting and modifying). Also, if you are editing a para that has a number of imbedded citation templates it can very difficult to follow what is going on (click edit on this), and tell where one sentence or clause ends and another begins. What is important is that the citation format (ie Harvard, MLA, etc) is consistently used across the article, not that a template (designed for beginners) is used. Ceoil (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ceoil. Well, I doubt that they pose as much of a problem as you suggest, but don't feel strongly enough about the matter to suggest that the templates be reapplied. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 13:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I can't stand the blighters. Editing articles with these darn template formats is a nightmare. Paul B (talk) 14:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie Minogue[edit]

I reworded the Kylie reference and moved it down to "Influences". I'm not really sure, though, that it belongs here at all. Influences does have a good catchall phrase anyway and there must be many, many such references, all of which we cannot list: is this one so specially significant? I am tempted to just remove it, but what do you think? Your view is very welcome! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC) PS Yes I know it's a great song. But.[reply]

File:John Everett Millais - Ophelia - Google Art Project.jpg to appear as POTD[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:John Everett Millais - Ophelia - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 2, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-01-02. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

Ophelia is an oil painting on canvas completed by Sir John Everett Millais between 1851 and 1852. It depicts the character Ophelia, from Shakespeare's play Hamlet, singing before she drowns in a river in Denmark; this death scene is not seen onstage, but is instead described in a speech by Queen Gertrude. The painting was completed in two stages: first, the setting (drawn from the Hogsmill River in Surrey) then Ophelia (portrayed by Elizabeth Siddal). The painting is now owned by Tate Britain and valued at more than £30 million.Painting: John Everett Millais

Archive – More featured pictures...

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ophelia (painting). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071106005229/http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/archive/display.var.486584.0.painters_took_to_local_colour.php to http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/archive/display.var.486584.0.painters_took_to_local_colour.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]