Talk:Mr. Tambourine Man (album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mr. Tambourine Man (album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mr. Tambourine Man (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091012183429/http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg to http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:706149

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mr. Tambourine Man (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101028024421/http://ebni.com/byrds/relassociates12.html to http://ebni.com/byrds/relassociates12.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake under Release and reception? Last paragraph seems to have repetition and attribution error.[edit]

In the last paragraph of Release and Reception, the quote 'a significant step in the evolution of rock & roll itself, demonstrating that intelligent lyrical content could be wedded to compelling electric guitar riffs and a solid backbeat' is repeated and attributed to two different authors. Unterberger and then Fricke.

Mr.datsun (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted! Don't know how that snuck in there. The comment is Unterberger's, not Fricke's. Fixed it now. Thanks. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Professional reviews[edit]

Is there a reason why only one professional review is included? Most album pages have several reviews -- this one is only one review from 1965. Some more recent assessments would be better. freshacconci (✉) 15:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good point. I just added the AllMusic review to that section. But I agree finding other contemporary (or vintage) reviews would be good. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 10:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]