Talk:Monandrous

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is unuseful. It should redirect to stamen or orchidaceae. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelwyn (talkcontribs) 08:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It also contradicts Orchidaceae about whether the primitive orchid had one or three stamens. I'd probably say we should redirect to wiktionary (or transwiki, or whatever the procedure is - I'm not saying the text currently at Monandrous is worth keeping). Trying to turn Orchidaceae or Stamen into a long list of term definitions is not likely to be good for those articles. Kingdon 13:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about in humans? Among my gay friends, monandrous is a preferred substitute term for monogamous. Ydhirsch (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If that's right, then that detail should be included in the article monogamy. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a dictionary, so things are grouped according to what they are, not what they're called.  dummelaksen  (talkcontribs) 21:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]