Talk:List of premiers of Alberta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of premiers of Alberta is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2006Featured list candidatePromoted

Glitch[edit]

Either there's a nine-day overlap between the terms of Peter Lougheed and Don Getty, or there's a typo and "November 1" is supposed to be "November 10" (or vice versa). DS 20:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?[edit]

Should this be moved to List of Premiers of Alberta ta match the format used for other government leaders lists? --Arctic Gnome 15:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. —Nightstallion (?) 21:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, it seems all Canadian leader lists are named like this... —Nightstallion (?) 19:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haultain ?[edit]

Assuming this is a list for Alberta provincial Premiers. Haultain doesn't belong here. What does everyone think? GoodDay 20:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, Haultain is not Premier, but he was Premier of the territory which, part of then became Alberta. I'd leave him in but to explain.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.246.86.66 (talk) 06:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ref vs ref-note[edit]

The table had some footnotes; I used the {{ref}}-{{note}} system with the intent of differentiating those notes from the general references (those use the cite.php style). That has been converted several times (by differet editors), the result being that the footnotes migrate from the end of the table to the end of the page. My guess is that editors use automatic programs to convert between references style, but maybe there's something I'm missing. I thougt I'd discuss the issue here. Restored in the meantime. --Qyd 16:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added footnotes at the bottom of the table because the notes and references were mixed together. 117Avenue (talk) 00:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alison Redford profile headshot.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Alison Redford profile headshot.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

14th Premier[edit]

We should wait until Redford takes office, before labeling her as 14th. GoodDay (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Even if Stelmach dies before she is sworn in, she still becomes Premier. 117Avenue (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Answers his own question. Oh, if she dies before. 117Avenue (talk) 00:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don Getty drinking from Grey Cup.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Don Getty drinking from Grey Cup.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Official" swearing in"[edit]

Seeking to avoid an edit war, I am taking this to the talk page to resolve the disagreement. The issue s this sentence: “Premier Rutherford and his government were not officially sworn in until September 9, 1905.”

The point that I am making is that a swearing-in is by definition an official act. After someone taking a public office swears an Oath of Office, he or she can exercise the legal authority of that office – sign documents, etc. Before the swearing in, he or she does not hold the office. In some cases, e.g., the inauguration of a US president, an oath is sworn in private, and then repeated at a public ceremony, but in these cases, the person has assumed office after swearing the oath the first time.

User:117Avenue has argued that Rutherford may have been unofficially sworn in before September 9 by “Rutherford talking with Bulyea to become Premier”. Either there was an oath sworn, in which case Rutherford was sworn in and became premier during that private meeting. This would be no less “official” than a subsequent public swearing-in. Or, there wasn’t an oath sworn and Rutherford did not become premier during that private meeting.

In any event, Wikipedia reports what we know and not what we don’t know. We know that there was a public swearing in on September 9, so we can report that. We do not know if there was a private but equally “official” swearing in before that.

I propose to change the sentence to read: “Premier Rutherford and his government were not publicly sworn in until September 9, 1905.” Ground Zero | t 17:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You claim that "before the swearing in, he or she does not hold the office", this is simply untrue. The office of the premier is an appointed duty, and Rutherford (and possibly Scott as well) was premier before the recorded public swearing in. An "only swearing in makes it official" theology is an American one, the Parliament of Canada records that Layton became Leader of the Official Opposition on election night, and the Prime Minister of Canada isn't required to swear an oath. I think to clarify the point that Rutherford's start of office was not normal, the note should clarify that the swearing in did not start the premiership or government. I support the change to "public sworn in". 117Avenue (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on List of premiers of Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 4 external links on List of premiers of Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 3 external links on List of premiers of Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]