Talk:List of id Software games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of id Software games is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 21, 2018Featured list candidatePromoted

Requested move 28 July 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee? 11:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


List of id Software gamesList of Id Software games – Follows WP:TMRULES and matches consensus established at Talk:Id Software#Re-capitalize Id Software. I'm only doing an RM instead of moving it myself because this page reached featured status with this title. IagoQnsi (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Procedural oppose This is putting the cart before the horse; id Software needs to be moved to the new name before this list can be moved. I suggest withdrawing this and proposing the move on that page instead.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. There's definitely no consensus on moving id Software in that discussion, which hasn't been active in almost two years. @Lordtobi: has reverted @IagoQnsi: edits on id Software too. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:14, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, as per my revert on the primary article, "id Software" is the most common spelling of all and reproduced in 99.9% of all sources (with exception of those calling them "ID Software"), even if this goes against TMRULES, the exception has been established for over a decade and IMO we should just keep it. The discussion you are linking has been started by me because two years ago I thought it'd be a good idea... I was wrong and have since striked my support there, leaving only one supporter (which you couldn't call 'consensus'). 11:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Alright, I support speedy closing this RM. I couldn't find a discussion establishing "id Software" as the proper capitalization -- the last discussion on the talk page was the one I linked to. It seems it is overwhelmingly used this way, even in news publications that would likely have strong copyediting, so I stand corrected. --IagoQnsi (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is exactly the same as "macys" and the other lower-case examples at MOS:TM. MOS:TM exists for cases like this. Just follow it.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼 
  • Oppose' - per prior comments. The Macy's example above is nonsense. If a name or title can be easily represented using the standard character set (upper/lower case and basic punctuation) in a way which is in profound common usage, then we should represent it that way. Pedantic MOS presentations styles should never WP:ASTONISH readers and editors. The MOS serves us - not the other way around. -- Netoholic @ 11:58, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-!vote: Procedural objection. The main article's talk page, Talk:Id Software, should probably have an RfC about this, widely advertised (at least to WT:MOSTM, WT:MOSCAPS, WT:MOSFICT, WT:MOSVG, WT:WPVG, WT:NCVG, WT:COMPANIES). If consensus concludes to use "Id" in running text, then this article would move automatically. However, moving this side article by itself – with far fewer watchers – to "Id" would have the effect of deciding the "Id" vs. "id" spelling matter for all related articles, and that seems a bit too WP:CONLEVEL-problematic to me. Especially since RM trawlers are apt to do one of two things: side by default with MOS:CAPS / MOS:TM without digging very deep, or just WP:ILIKEIT "voting" in favor of the "official" spelling, being either uaware or outright defiant of our naming conventions and other guidelines. If you see WT:Manual of Style/Trademarks#A "settled" example, id Software?, you'll find I've done some source research. The case for "id" is weaker than it is for iPod and eBay, but it's stronger than it is for most cases of lower-cased stylization of trademarks that we'd reject out-of-hand. At the proposed RfC, I might even weakly side with the "id" view at this point. [It's arguably a stronger case than for "k.d. lang", which is the one that really needs revisiting – RS regularly give her name as "K. D. Lang" or "K.D. Lang", including in major newspapers.]  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  01:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.