Talk:List of federal judges appointed by George Washington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of federal judges appointed by George Washington is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on February 9, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
April 21, 2009Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Comparisons to active judges or to Reagan's appointees[edit]

I'm confused. At the FJC, when you search on the judges appointed by Ronald Reagan, it only lists 358 names. But this article, and Ronald Reagan judicial appointments, show 376. What gives?

Also, the FJC shows 795 judges in active status, with 492 more in senior status. 38/795 = 4.8%, which is probably a more accurate figure. After all, the point of the statistic is that if a president today were to appoint justices to all seats (as Washington was able to do), he would be able to appoint 795 judges (not 795+492), of which 38 is closer to 5% than 2%.

But then, this is still comparing apples to oranges, since many of Washington's appointments were to the same seat (consecutively). So a fair comparison (I think) would be between the 795 (+vacancies?) seats currently and the 27 (?) seats at the time. – Quadell (talk) 13:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I meant that, of all 3,200+ federal judges ever appointed, Washington appointed less than 2% (even though he appointed the entire federal judiciary for eight years). The number of active judges right now is somewhat lower than the number of positions - there are, I believe, about 60 vacancies on the federal courts right now. About the difference for Reagan, I would guess that the eighteen judge difference is the number of two-time appointments (i.e. people Reagan first appointed to a District Court, and then to a Court of Appeals. bd2412 T 16:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah yes, elevations. That makes sense. Let me see if I can make the article text clearer. – Quadell (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'd still like to see an image of the Judiciary Act, if there's one of sufficient quality that it doesn't look like a blob! bd2412 T 17:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of federal judges appointed by George Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of federal judges appointed by George Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of federal judges appointed by George Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]