Talk:List of events at T-Mobile Arena

Text and/or other creative content from this version of T-Mobile Arena was copied or moved into List of events at T-Mobile Arena with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 27 December 2023, see discussion.
kept, 9 October 2017, see discussion.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Sections?[edit]

Instead of a color coding table, would it be easier to do a musical events section, sports event section, and an other section? Also, it would look a lot nicer if the dates were in actual chronological order. I know it'll have repetition, but merging dates in the same row looks confusing and disorganized. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 18:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think organizing the list by date is the most natural choice for a list of events; breaking it into sections by the type of event would feel disjointed to me. As for the events that have separate dates merged into a single row (like George Strait's residency), I don't feel strongly about it - I combined them so as that the list wouldn't seem like it's dominated by one performer as you skim through, but it could cause a bit of confusion by having the dates out of order. Toohool (talk) 18:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of events at T-Mobile Arena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160729002102/http://www.usctrojans.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/072716aad.html to http://www.usctrojans.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/072716aad.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This link is functioning fine, so I reverted the change. Perhaps it was down temporarily. I will monitor it a bit and see if the issue returns. dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas Review-Journal Comment[edit]

I came to this page from my Watchlist when I was notified that the IABot made a change. I reversed the change because the link seemed to be live and only temporarily down. Then I ran this tool [1] and it showed a number of broken links. Also, a dead link since there didn't seem to be a working replacement in the Internet Archive Wayback Machine for it. I saw an editor replace the dead link with a working link almost immediately after I posted it. So, I became curious. Apparently, all of the Las Vegas Review-Journal links that stopped working were not actually pulled from the web site, but instead reorganized. I tried one and I was able to remove the archive link and replace it with a live link. I wish I had known before I replaced a mess of links with archives. If someone wants to replace the archive links with the updated live links, they can do so. I can't do it tonight that's for sure. If I have time tomorrow, I'll see if I can do it. It's no difference replacing the dead links or the archive links with updated live links. I would revert the archive links, but actually it's better having them until the updated links are put in, better an archive link than a dead link. dawnleelynn^(talk) 04:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]