This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This list only covers initiatives to the people and does not cover initiatives to the legislature, which also started their numbering at 1 and are now at around 340. Should another list be created for initiatives to the legislature? It seems like it might be a little cumbersome and confusing to add all the initiatives to the legistlature to this list. --Lukobe 07:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think it should be a separate article. For example, Affirmative action links here for I-200, and it is very confusing. -- Jmabel | Talk 22:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Should we move the current one to List of Washington initiatives to the people and make List of Washington initiatives a disambiguation page? --Lukobe 22:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If there's no objection, I'll do it if/when I have time. --Lukobe 06:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently in the process of reformatting every listing into a table, adding a source for each, and adding YES/NO votes. Afterwards, I'll work on linking as many of these as I can to their respective articles, and will most likely create pages for some of the more important ones. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 08:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Update 2 - Wow. I completely forgot about this. I'm currently working on a major translation process, but I will be getting back around to this next. Shouldn't be more than one more days work! ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 06:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I severely overestimated how mindnumbingly boring updating this article would be. I plan on continuing, but it's not taking priority for me at the moment. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 03:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Should we be listing advisory votes here as well? They're on the ballot and are voted on, but AFAIK don't actually have any legally binding impact. I don't have a problem with adding them, it'll just be repetitive since they're all some variation of "Should we have a new tax in X amount". Tagging @SounderBruce and @Reywas92 as editors who helped get this to FL status. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 18:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't think they're necessary since they're entirely non-binding, would just be clutter. Reywas92Talk 20:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
