Talk:List of Alberta general elections

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of Alberta general elections is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 25, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
November 26, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 10, 2006Featured list candidatePromoted
January 30, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
June 16, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
May 9, 2011Featured list removal candidateKept
Current status: Featured list

GA delisting[edit]

Whoever promoted this article unfortunately did not give a review on why this article was promoted. For this delisting, I mention that lists are no longer considered as part of Good Articles and should be nominated in Wikipedia:Featured lists. RelHistBuff 11:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wildrose[edit]

Since I know this is going to be an issue on election night, I am going to start the discussion now. Please note how wide the table already is. To prevent the table from getting any wider, only parties that have won seats three times have a column. Meaning that after the 2012 election, (if you include the Alberta Alliance win in 2004,) the Wildrose Party would have only done it twice. Which is why I am saying that the Wildrose should only get a column if they win the election. 117Avenue (talk) 23:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And if Wildrose becomes the Official Opposition, what then? – Jwkozak91 (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Impossible, that party was never registered. But if you mean the Wildrose Party, their number would be in the other column, like 1940. 117Avenue (talk) 01:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This graph just looks silly. The Official Opposition Party is "Other". I'm not a supporter, but they are a major successful political movement and that should be reflected here, until they merge and cease to exist in the next election. The Unity Party of 1940 was a platform-less group of independents. This is kind of different, isn't it? Jaydub99 (talk) 23:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updating[edit]

Stacked bar graph showing election results in Alberta since the creation of the province.

I'm assuming also the list has not been updated yet as we are waiting for official results. I've created a replacement graph in Wikimedia commons. Following the pattern of past years, Wildrose fits in the "Other" column. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgnat (talkcontribs) 21:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked somebody else to update this figure, but seeing as you have, I'm going to go ahead and move this over to the main article. Sidenote: I think a separate discussion on a separate column for Wildrose needs to be held at some point. Basically, I think if they win seats in the next Alberta election as well, then a column will need to be created for them (possibly at the expense of the 'Legislature' column, which could probably be excised from the table without too much fuss...). --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Alberta general elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Banananananananananananananaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:1487:BA00:F1A5:E6B:43C:73BD (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]