Talk:Kent Wildlife Trust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listKent Wildlife Trust is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on September 13, 2019.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 20, 2018Featured list candidatePromoted

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kent Wildlife Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kent Wildlife Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of infobox[edit]

Several wildlife trusts, such as Essex, Herts and Middlesex and Suffolk are Featured lists and do not have infoboxes. I am revising this article in the same format intending to nominate it also for FL. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. It certainly needs editing to make it an article rather than a list (of reserves). I was modelling it on Scottish WT (and Northumberland) which have infoboxes with their logo. Kent logo will be deleted if not included in the article as it is non-free. Finavon (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Kent Wildlife Trust[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Kent Wildlife Trust's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "KWT":

  • From Nemo Down: "Nemo Down". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
  • From Old Park Hill: "Old Park Hill". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
  • From Stone Wood: "Stone Wood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  • From Parsonage Wood: "Parsonage Wood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  • From Hothfield Common: "Hothfield Heathlands". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 12 February 2018.
  • From Collingwood Nature Reserve: "Collingwood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  • From Fackenden Down: "Fackenden Down". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
  • From Wattle Wood: "Wattle Wood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  • From South Blean: "South Blean". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 7 January 2018.
  • From Nashenden Down: "Nashenden Down". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  • From The Gill: "The Gill". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 4 February 2018.
  • From Spuckles and Kennelling Woods: "Spuckles and Kennelling Woods (Wilderness Down)". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 18 February 2018.
  • From Turners Field: "Turners Field". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  • From Kiln Wood: "Kiln Wood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 18 February 2018.
  • From Spong Wood: "Spong Wood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  • From Hewitt's Chalk Bank: "Hewitt's Chalk Bank". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
  • From Broadham Down: "Broadham Down". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 7 January 2018.
  • From Sladden Wood: "Sladden Wood". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
  • From Kemsing Down: "Kemsing Down". Kent Wildlife Trust. Retrieved 22 January 2018.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 20:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref error fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]