Talk:Keating!

Keating! has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 17, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
January 21, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Keating! is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Musical Theatre

Keating! is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Polling Booth where?[edit]

The plot summary refers to "a single polling booth in Surrey Hills returns the final results". However, when the show played in Wollongong in 2007, the polling booth was said to have been in Wollongong. It seems likely that the location of this booth moves with the venue, but because I have only seen the show once I can't be certain. --Mckinlayr 02:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the polling booth that returns the final results does, in fact, change according to the location of the performance. Interestingly, in the original version the votes that change the course of the election came from the "Mawson Base" in Antartica. Jcleeland 13:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antony Green[edit]

I've added a short bit on the song that's played while the 1993 votes are tallied, purely because the song is hilarious if nothing else. I'm a bit poor at remembering details though, so I'm hoping someone else will flesh it out some more. Dazcha (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that with Kerry O'Brien? I'm hoping someone has some nous to get it on youtube... (Bobbo9000 (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Promotions[edit]

Add something about how this show was promoted as "The Musical We Had to Have" - a send-up of Keating's own "The Recession We Had to Have" quip?

203.56.94.16 (talk) 01:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Old Nick Company's next show[edit]

Clearly, this link is out of date, and should be removed:
Old Nick Company, website of the Old Nick Company's production of the musical.
--wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 17:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Keating!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311083351/http://www.reviews.media-culture.org.au/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2726 to http://reviews.media-culture.org.au/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2726
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080502172821/http://www.stagenoise.com/featuresdisplay.php?id=62 to http://www.stagenoise.com/featuresdisplay.php?id=62
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704045859/http://www.keatingtheopera.com/ to http://www.keatingtheopera.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]