Talk:Joseph Desha

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 22:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Loss of office

I question this: "These controversies, along with an improving economy, propelled Desha's political foes to victory" Usually, an improving economy is good for the incumbent--it means the policies are working. Is there a source saying the opposite? Beyondallmeaning (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Desha was elected almost entirely on the strength of his support for drastic (and ultimately illegal) debt relief measures. As long as most people were suffering from the bad economy – and many were in debt – they were willing to vote for supporters of these drastic measures, but when the economy improved, the wrongheadedness of the debt relief schemes became more apparent, and Desha's lack of acumen concerning other heretofore less important issues showed through. Acdixon ^{(talk · contribs)} 21:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Conservative

I'm curious about whether these positions meet the definition of "conservative" at that time, or today: "Desha gradually became more conservative after his return to the House, consistently resisting expansion of the U.S. Navy.[21] He also opposed Secretary of War James Monroe's request to maintain a standing peacetime army of 20,000 men.[22] Desha argued that a large standing army provided the advocates of a larger federal government with an excuse to increase taxes, and proposed that the standing army should consist of only 6,000 men.[22] A coalition of Federalists and conservative Democratic-Republicans in the House united to adopt Desha's suggestion by a vote of 75–65.[23] The version of the bill passed by the Senate, however, required a standing army of 15,000 men.[23] The legislation was referred to a conference committee, which ultimately adopted a compromise of 10,000 men.[23]" Beyondallmeaning (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I think I accessed this source through Questia, and my free membership has expired. I requested renewal, but it hasn't come through yet. Best I recall, though, "conservative" was the actual word used in the source. Acdixon ^{(talk · contribs)} 21:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

For the information of the editors of this article, "Beyondallmeaning" was a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user and has also been indefinitely blocked [1]. They should not have been editing at all so their comments may be disregarded.Smeat75 (talk) 13:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference columns

Not wishing to be bold on a FA, could I ask for the reference list to be split into at least two columns? The white space to the right of it is an absolute eyesore IMO. --Cassianto^Talk 23:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you speaking of the footnotes? They show in three columns for me. Could be an IE/Firefox thing. I use Firefox. Acdixon ^{(talk · contribs)} 19:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

That was me. They were in one column when I first posted this. Cheers Cassianto^Talk 10:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

This article may require protection from vandalism

someone by the username "ilovepancakes2" vandalised the page, editing the subject's description to include the legend "first known child molester." I undid the vandal's vandalism, but suspect they'll do it again. Shotguntony (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Desha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527181343/http://kynghistory.ky.gov/people/Kentucky%2BMilitary%2BGovernors.htm to http://kynghistory.ky.gov/people/Kentucky%2BMilitary%2BGovernors.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)