The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Wikipedia's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
You Will Not Replace Us was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Identity Evropa. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Schiano, Chris (2019-04-27). "'Americans of European Heritage Exclusively': Identity Evropa Front Group Meetings Leaked". Unicorn Riot. Archived from the original on 2019-04-28. Retrieved 2019-04-28. The American Identity Movement has continued Identity Evropa's attempts to coordinating members editing the group's Wikipedia page to be more favorable to AmIM/IE. The group's leaders expressed fears that the Identity Evropa Wikipedia page would simply be renamed to the American Identity Movement, which threatens their attempts to distance themselves from the earlier organization.
Reminder to expect paid brigading, sockpuppetry and astroturfing from Identity Evropa on this article[edit]
Those of you who've been paying attention will have noticed, likely to your dissatisfaction, that the atrocious Identity Evropa Wikipedia page
now states that American Identity Movement is a rebrand of IE (incorrect). While our Wikipedia team's efforts have been heroic, it's becoming
increasingly clear that we will be unable to win this without help.
As such, we will be hiring a company to create a new AIM Wikipedia page. This will cost us thousands of dollars, but it will well be worth it.
Oftentimes, the Wikipedia page for a particular entity is the first thing that comes up in a Google search; such is the case for our nascent
organization.
Thankfully, a generous member has donated $1000. Another has donated $300. The best package costs $3500„ so we're going to try to get as
close to this number as possible.
TO donate to our Wikipedia fund, you can send a contribution via Zelle to {REDACTED} or to via mail: {REDACTED}.
Swap the dragon's eye logo with the AIM logo?[edit]
Now that the organisation has rebranded, even though it is better known by its former name shouldn't you swap the positions on the page of the two logos? With the dragon's eye going into the spot in the article and the new AIM logo going into the infobox. Ptwinters (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not as long as the article is called "Identity Evropa". Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should we begin discussing moving the page then? Also I second that the logo should match the article tittle. Bgrus22 (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We are not moving the article. They are most well-known as Identity Evropa; we will not be doing their white-wash job for them.--Jorm (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
