Talk:Hotel Wolcott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Hotel Wolcott
The Hotel Wolcott

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hotel Wolcott; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Hotel Wolcott/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Happy to review this article. It may take me more than a week because I am traveling. Bruxton (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Bruxton, I appreciate it. And feel free to take your time. Epicgenius (talk) 13:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

Green tickY good lead summary. All of the elements are cited in the body and the lead summarizes the article.

Grammar[edit]

Green tickY consider removing had from "42nd Street had contained brownstones"
Green tickY "and eastern elevations contain plain brick facades" consider "and eastern elevations have plain brick facades"
Green tickY "to the west (right) are a wood-and-glass door" consider "is"
Green tickY "The third through eighth stories contain a pink-brick facade" consider "have" a pink...
Green tickY "the two center bays of the Wolcott's facade has oriel windows" consider "have"
Green tickY "Near the center of the hotel, there were also a palm room to the left of the lobby" consider "was".
Green tickY "The ground story also contains a ballroom covering 3,500" consider has instead of contains
Green tickY "little chicken that come unplucked from the Jersey farms" does the quote say "come" or came?
Green tickY "the hotel become a shelter for homeless former prisoners" consider "became"
I have done all of the above. Regarding the chicken quote, the original source says "come", as it was a contemporary brochure published from the time of the hotel's opening. Epicgenius (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Green tickY Site section citations check out,
Green tickY Architecture section cotations check out
Green tickY Facade citations check out
Green tickY Features sections checks out
Green tickY Public rooms section, I am having trouble confirming this citation for "The lobby ends at a checkout counter."
The source says: "But the lobby ends abruptly with a modest check-in desk, which shuts off what was formerly an equally elaborate ballroom." I've fixed this. Epicgenius (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY Guestrooms spot checked citations check out
Green tickY History the citations I can access check out AGF
Green tickY Development and opening citations check out
Green tickY 1900s to 1960s citations check out
Green tickY 1970s to present spot checked citations check out
Green tickY Critical reception Cannot access the citations AGF

Other[edit]

Green tickY I think per MOS:ORDER we need to move the portal bar below the navigation footer templates
I have fixed this. Thanks for the review. Epicgenius (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Green tickY Images are relevant and free

Review chart[edit]

Status:  Reviewing...

100% reviewed

   

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Yes
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Yes
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Yes
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Yes
2c. it contains no original research. Yes
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Yes
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Yes
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Yes
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Yes
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Yes
7. Overall assessment. Good work!
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.