Talk:Heaven Hill Kentucky Whiskey

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

United States: Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

Merging Old Heaven Hill article into this one[edit]

Since Old Heaven Hill is just one variation of bottling label for the Heaven Hill brand of whiskey, I believe the article on that topic should just become a redirect to this article. I believe there is basically nothing in that article that isn't already here anyway. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I just noticed that Craiglduncan has just removed all but one of the Heaven Hill whiskey variations from this article. So the statement above saying that the content was already included in this article is actually no longer correct. The basic question is whether these various label variations that all say Heaven Hill in them should each get their own article. Personally, I think I would prefer just one article that describes all of them. As one point of reference, the "Our Brands -> Bourbon" page on the company's web site just refers collectively to "the Heaven Hill Bourbon family" and the "Our Brands -> Other Whiskeys" page says "Heaven Hill also produces blended whiskeys under the Kentucky Beau, T.W. Samuels, Heaven Hill, Wilson and Gukenheimer labels, among others." Personally, I don't think each label variation within a brand family should have a separate article – I don't think we generally provide separate articles when some basic brand name has a black label, a white label, a "gentleman" variation, a commemorative special bottling, etc. Please refer to the article as of 00:37, 14 February 2011 for the example of what I suggest that it should look like. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with as many variations being contained on one page as possible if they are infact the same product. Heaven Hill has 4 or 5 different Bourbons and they should be all listed on the same page with no seperate pages. In this case, one is a Bourbon and one is a Blended whiskey. Jim Beam is a prime example and Wild Turkey is another. Wild Turkey has four different variations but they are all on the same page. Incorporating both Heaven Hill products (Bourbon and Blended whiskey) on the same page would be like having only one page for Barton Rum and Barton Canadian Whisky, the are two completely different liquors. Hope this helps.--Craiglduncan (talk) 02:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

Do any better photos exist? No sane person -- well, no sane person who isn't a raging alcoholic -- would fill a brandy snifter with whiskey like that. Schnaz (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]