Talk:Harry Potter video games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 1 February 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to any particular title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter video games → List of Wizarding World video games – Since Book of Spells, Book of Potions, Fantastic Beasts: Cases from the Wizarding World, Harry Potter: Hogwarts Mystery, and Harry Potter: Wizards Unite are actually part of the bigger Wizarding World franchise and not only specific to the Harry Potter series. Brojam (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support perhaps instead to "Wizarding World video games", since this isn't a list.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • True, Wizarding World video games would be more appropriate. - Brojam (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Well, it's certainly not a list article. It's quite clearly a series article. It should also be noted that the article prodominantly covers the main series novel adaptations rather than other series, and doesn't cover the fantastic beasts game at all, apart from in the release table, that should probably be removed Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The information about the FB game can be added/expanded. And what about the other games such as Book of Spells, Book of Potions, Harry Potter: Hogwarts Mystery, and Harry Potter: Wizards Unite? - Brojam (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Harry Potter video games/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Aza24 (talk · contribs) 04:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review this article – expect comments in the next 24 hours or so. Aza24 (talk) 04:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • I may come back to the lead after reading through but it looks good.
  • generally the first mention of something in the text is linked even if already linked in the lead, right? (Electronic Arts)
  • Is the first line of development referenced later in the section or is there a missing ref?

Novel adaptations[edit]

  • "for the North American release" ?
  • "...by five different teams, creating five different versions, for different consoles" may work better as "...by five different teams, each creating different versions for different consoles"
  • "The game was released after the Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets," right now this sounds like the "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" was released after the Chamber of Secrets, is this really true?
    • Yes! Basically the first game was remade for next gen hardware after the release of the second game. I've reworded slightly. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The game featured puzzles aimed" starting this sentence with "the game" like the one before is a little awkward, and it's somewhat unclear which game is being referred to right after the mention of the Chamber of Secrets
  • "The PC version, however, many of the same..." missing word here? (contained? included?)
  • Perhaps link Hedwig to Hedwig (Harry Potter) and link Buckbeak (which should redirect to it's section on Hagrid's page I believe
  • Was there a Mac release for Prisoner of Azkaban?
    • I don't think so - I can't find a source that suggests that it did release. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You could link "Multiplayer" in "Multiplayer components..."
  • "film of the same name" should be linked as such
  • Was Hermoine still playable in Half Blood prince video game?

Other[edit]

  • I'm assuming GBA means Game Boy advanced? I would spell it out here, I don't think a lot of people would be familiar with it. Alternativly you could have put: "(GBA)" after an earlier mention of this. Consider spelling out Electronic Arts here as well or doing the parenthesis thing in the development section: "Electronic Arts (EA) developed all games"
    • I've spelt it out. I think it's fine if we were to initial it, but not necessary. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Prisoner of Azkaban film" needs link
  • Quotes around Chasers is probably unnecessary
    • Might look into it and see if there is a glossary link for the term Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The series was split into two: Lego Harry Potter: Years 1–4 was released in 2010 and Lego Harry Potter: Years 5–7 was released in 2011." may sound better as "The series was split into two: Lego Harry Potter: Years 1–4 was released in 2010, followed by Lego Harry Potter: Years 5–7 in 2011." (to avoid a double "was released in")

  • Perhaps combine this sentence "These were both released for PlayStation 3.[23] These games used the PlayStation Move controller, as well as the Wonderbook accessory for the PlayStation Eye." into one. At the moment a double "these" at the beginning of the sentence makes it rather choppy.
  • Link Voldemort
  • link Hogwarts Express and it should redirect to the appropriate section
  • link "the book series" to Harry Potter?
  • link Hogwarts in the first mention ("take place away from Hogwarts")
  • "featured a new spin on the" -> "was a spin of on the" may more to the point
  • "In Harry Potter games, gameplay was often set around puzzles, although in some games, this is sometimes lessened in favour of more action-oriented scenes." there's some issues with this line
    • "although in some" and "sometimes" is redundant
    • At the moment, the line doesn't really mean anything. "Gameplay was often set around puzzles but sometimes around action" is basically what it's saying – can this be specified? It seems like the action games were the later ones so what about something like "In Harry Potter games gameplay was often set around puzzles, but later games had increasingly more action orientated scenes"
    • Reworded Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It looks like Nintendo isn't mentioned until the releases table, should this be mentioned earlier in the "Novel adaptations" section?
  • Would link Nintendo
  • What is this line: "The series generally received acclaim for its representation of the media it is based on" supported by?
    • Reworded. and combined paras - this was an introductory sentence, but probably a bit NPOV-lite. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should Gamespot be italicized the earlier two times?
  • Why "Gerald Villoria" italicized, is this a person?
  • Why is Hogwarts italicized? And it should only be linked earlier?
  • "received severely lower scores" -> "received increasingly lower scores" perhaps
  • Not sure why Kristine Steimer is italicized, is there something I'm missing about italicizing reviewers?
  • The original "The Harry Potter video game series received mixed reviews from critics" isn't seeming so accurate after reading further, thoughts on rewording this line a little bit?
    • Mixed is pretty much the definition of what happened, it was good in places, bad in others. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "been generally praised" –> "been generally praised better than the (however you describe the normal Harry Potter video games)" otherwise the line doesn't mean much
  • link to Spike Video Game Awards?
  • I believe the two games in the "awards" section are overlinked
  • Would link "original seven novels" in the note to the series article Aza24 (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

  • I recognize you have the release timeline, but the years for most of the games are not mentioned in the text of the "Novel adaptations" section. Perhaps in order to not mess with the text too much, the first mention of the game could be put in parenthesis after the game? e.g. "During the release of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)..."
  • There's a lot of overlinking especially in the "other games" section
  • Putting this article on hold for a week for these comments to be addressed. Will look through sources later. Aza24 (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for the review Aza24 - all looks pretty doable. I won't be able to look at this in depth until the weekend though, sadly. I'll address this then :). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review[edit]

Getting back to this later than I meant to. Things are looking good, all comments have been addressed appropraitely, I'm gonna do a source view below:

  • I linked some publishers and such
  • All that's left is some refs missing the "|work=" or "|publisher=" (95, 96, 97, 116, 117, 118)
  • Fix these minor things and you'll be good to go! Aza24 (talk) 07:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lee Vilenski: Lol I was about to ping to make sure you saw this but they're such minor fixes I figured I'd just quickly do them myself. Great work, here passing now!
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox platforms[edit]

I'm noticing the infobox platform parameter lists Playstation as its title, the only platform listed when it's collapsed. Even when the list is expanded Playstation is bolded. I think this gives undue weight to the Playstation platform, for a game series that has always been multi-platform. A quick search of other long-running multi platform series (GTA, Assassin's Creed, Call of Duty, etc) just doesn't collapse the list. I think this is a better solution. Unless anyone objects, I'll make that change in the next few days. Darkage7[Talk] 17:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change the title of this page[edit]

I think the title of this page ought to be changed to 'Wizarding World Video games' as the Hogwarts Legacy is strictly not under Harry Potter but under the Wizarding World umbrella. Sivany29 (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely the Wizarding World is based on the Harry Potter series? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Lee Vilenski above. Breaktheicees (talk) 03:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Potter_video_games&oldid=1202599944"